Kind en adolescent

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 137–156 | Cite as

De rol van seksuele opvoeding in de ontwikkeling van seksualiteit en seksueel expliciete mediaconsumptie in de adolescentie

  • Geertjan OverbeekEmail author
  • Daphne van de Bongardt
  • Laura Baams


In dit onderzoek toetsen we twee hypothesen over de rol van seksuele opvoeding in de ontwikkeling van seksualiteit en seksueel expliciete mediaconsumptie tijdens de adolescentie. De bufferhypothese stelt dat een actieve mediaopvoeding door ouders het effect van seksueel expliciete mediaconsumptie op seksuele attituden en gedrag van adolescenten buffert, en vice versa, het effect van seksuele attituden en gedrag van adolescenten op hun seksueel expliciete mediaconsumptie buffert. Een tweede hypothese, de remhypothese, stelt dat ouders door het communiceren van een seksuele ‘liefde-en-respectnorm’ de ontwikkeling richting meer seksueel expliciete mediaconsumptie, meer permissieve seksuele attituden en meer seksueel (risico) gedrag kunnen afremmen. We analyseerden 4‑wave longitudinale gegevens van 514 Nederlandse adolescenten in de leeftijd van 13–16 jaar (48,8% meisjes) en vonden bewijs voor de remhypothese. Als ouders vaker een liefde-en-respectnorm communiceerden, hadden adolescenten een minder permissieve seksuele attitude en rapporteerden met name jongens dan minder vergevorderd seksueel gedrag, evenals een minder sterke stijging van seksueel risicogedrag. Een actieve mediaopvoeding voorspelde een minder permissieve seksuele attitude (bij meisjes), maar we vonden geen systematisch bewijs voor de bufferhypothese.


seksuele opvoeding seksueel expliciete mediaconsumptie seksuele ontwikkeling longitudinaal onderzoek adolescentie 

The role of sex and sexuality education in the development of sexuality and sexually explicit media consumption in adolescence


In this longitudinal study, we examined two hypotheses on how sexuality-specific parenting – parenting aimed specifically at children’s sexual attitudes and behaviours – relates to adolescents’ sexual development. The ‘buffer hypothesis’ states that parents’ active media discussions with their children act as a buffer against the effects of sexualized media consumption on adolescents’ sexual attitudes and behaviour, and vice versa, against the effects of adolescents’ sexual attitudes and behaviour on their sexualized media consumption. The ‘brake hypothesis’ states that, by communicating sexual norms oriented to love and respect, parents act as a brake on increases in adolescents’ sexualized media use, permissive sexual attitudes, sexual behaviour and risky sexual behaviour. Using four-wave longitudinal data from 514 Dutch adolescents aged 13–16 (49.8% girls), we found evidence to support a brake effect. More frequent parental communication of love-and-respect-oriented sexual norms was associated with less permissive sexual attitudes and, for boys, with less advanced sexual behaviour and a slower increase in risky sexual behaviour. Active discussions by parents about adolescents’ sexualized media consumption were associated with less permissive baseline sexual attitudes, but only for girls. No systematic evidence emerged for the buffer hypothesis.


sexuality-specific parenting adolescence sexual development sexualized media consumption longitudinal study 


  1. Baams, L., Overbeek, G., Dubas, J. S., & Van Aken, M. (2014). On early starters and late bloomers: the development of sexual behavior in adolescence across personality types. Journal of Sex Research, 51, 754–764. Scholar
  2. Baams, L., Overbeek, G., Dubas, J. S., Doornwaard, S., Rommes, E., & Van Aken, M. (2015). Perceived realism moderates the relation between sexualized media consumption and permissive sexual attitudes in Dutch adolescents. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 743–754. Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1994). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (red.), Media effects: advances in theory and research (pag. 61–90). Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Baumeister, R. F., Catanese, K. R., & Vohs, K. (2001). Is there a gender difference in strength of sex drive? Theoretical views, conceptual distinctions, and a review of relevant evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 242–273. Scholar
  6. Bersamin, M. M., Todd, M., Fisher, D. A., Hill, D. L., Grube, J. W., & Walker, S. (2008). Parenting practices and adolescent sexual behavior: a longitudinal study. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 97–112. Scholar
  7. Bongardt, D. van de, Graaf, H. de, Reitz, E., & Deković, M. (2014). Parents as moderators of longitudinal associations between sexual peer norms and Dutch adolescents’ sexual initiation and intention. Journal of Adolescent Health, 55, 388–393. Scholar
  8. Brown, J. D. (2000). Adolescents’ sexual media diets. Journal of Adolescent Health, 27, 35–40. Scholar
  9. Brown, J. D., & L’Engle, K. L. (2009). X‑rated: Sexual attitudes and behaviors associated with U.S. early adolescents’ exposure to sexually explicit media. Communication Research, 36, 129–151. Scholar
  10. Brown, J. D., Halpern, C. T., & L’Engle, K. L. (2005). Mass media as a sexual super peer for early maturing girls. Journal of Adolescent Health, 36, 420–427. Scholar
  11. Buhi, E. R., & Goodson, P. (2007). Predictors of adolescent sexual behaviour and intention: a theory-guided systematic review. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40, 4–21. Scholar
  12. Crockett, L. J., Raffaelli, M., & Moilanen, K. L. (2003). Adolescent sexuality: behavior and meaning. In G. R. Adams & M. Berzonsky (red.), Blackwell handbook of adolescence (pag. 371–392). Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. DiIorio, C., Pluhar, E., & Belcher, L. (2003). Parent-child communication about sexuality: a review of the literature from 1980–2002. Journal of HIV/AIDS Prevention & Education for Adolescents & Children, 5, 7–32. Scholar
  14. Dittus, P. J., & Jaccard, J. (2000). Adolescents’ perceptions of maternal disapproval of sex: relationship to sexual outcomes. Journal of Adolescent Health, 26, 268–278. Scholar
  15. Doornwaard, S., Van den Eijnden, R. J. J. M., Overbeek, G., & Bogt, T. T. (2015). Differential developmental profiles of adolescents using sexually explicit internet material. Journal of Sex Research, 52, 269–281. Scholar
  16. Fisher, D. A., Hill, D. L., Grube, J. W., Bersamin, M. M., Walker, S., & Gruber, E. L. (2009). Televised sexual content and parental mediation: influences on adolescent sexuality. Media Psychology, 12, 121–147. Scholar
  17. Graaf, H. de, Kruijer, H., Acker, J. van, & Meijer, S. (2012). Seks onder je 25e. Seksuele gezondheid van jongeren in Nederland anno 2012. Sex under 25. Sexual health of Dutch youth in 2012. Delft: Eburon.Google Scholar
  18. Graaf, H. de, Vanwesenbeeck, I., Woertman, L., & Meeus, W. (2011). Parenting and adolescents’ sexual development in Western societies: a literature review. European Psychologist, 16, 21–31. Scholar
  19. Hald, G. M., Kuyper, L., Adam, P. C., & Wit, J. B. (2013). Does viewing explain doing? Assessing the association between sexually explicit materials use and sexual behaviors in a large sample of Dutch adolescents and young adults. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 10, 2986–2995. Scholar
  20. Hald, G. M., Seaman, C., & Linz, D. (2014). Pornography and sexuality. In D. L. Tolman, L. M. Diamond, J. A. Bauermeister, W. H. George, J. G. Pfaus & M. L. Ward (red.), Contextual approaches. APA handbook of sexuality and psychology, (band 2, pag. 3–35). Washington: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  21. Hennessy, L. R., Bleakly, A., Fishbein, M., & Jordan, A. (2009). Estimating the longitudinal association between adolescent sexual behavior and exposure to sexual media content. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 586–596. Scholar
  22. Hill, J. P., & Lynch, M. E. (1983). The intensification of gender-related role expectations during early adolescence. In J. Brooks-Gunn & A. Petersen (red.), Girls at puberty: biological and psychosocial perspectives (pag. 201–228). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. Scholar
  24. Jaccard, J., Dittus, P. J., & Gordon, V. V. (1996). Maternal correlates of adolescent sexual and contraceptive behavior. Family Planning Perspectives, 28, 159–185. Scholar
  25. Jaccard, J., Dodge, T., & Dittus, P. (2002). Parent‐adolescent communication about sex and birth control: a conceptual framework. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, (97), 9–42. Scholar
  26. Kotchick, B. A., Shaffer, A., Miller, K. S., & Forehand, R. (2001). Adolescent sexual risk behavior: a multi-system perspective. Clinical Psychology Review, 21, 493–519. Scholar
  27. Kreager, D. A., & Staff, J. (2009). The sexual double standard and adolescent peer acceptance. Social Psychology Quarterly, 72, 143–164. Scholar
  28. Lehr, S. T., Dilorio, C., Dudley, W. N., & Lipana, J. A. (2000). The relationship between parent-adolescent communication and safer sex behaviors in college students. Journal of Family Nursing, 6, 180–196. Scholar
  29. Lyons, H., Giordano, P. C., Manning, W. D., & Longmore, M. A. (2011). Identity, peer relationships, and adolescent girls’ sexual behavior: an exploration of the contemporary double standard. Journal of Sex Research, 48, 437–449. Scholar
  30. Miller, B. C. (2002). Family influences on adolescent sexual and contraceptive behavior. The Journal of Sex Research, 39, 22–26. Scholar
  31. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus user’s guide: statistical analysis with latent variables. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  32. Nathanson, A. I. (2002). The unintended effects of parental mediation of television on adolescents. Media Psychology, 4, 207–230. Scholar
  33. Nathanson, A. I., Wilson, B. J., McGee, J., & Sebastian, M. (2002). Counteracting the effects of female stereotypes on television via active mediation. Journal of Communication, 52, 922–937. Scholar
  34. Owens, E. W., Behun, R. J., Manning, J. C., & Reid, R. C. (2012). The impact of Internet pornography on adolescents: a review of the research. Sexual Addiction and Compulsivity, 19, 99–122. Scholar
  35. Parkes, A., Wight, D., Hunta, K., Henderson, M., & Sargent, J. (2013). Are sexual media exposure, parental restrictions on media use and co-viewing TV and DVDs with parents and friends associated with teenagers’ early sexual behaviour? Journal of Adolescence, 36, 1121–1133. Scholar
  36. Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2006). Adolescents’ exposure to sexually explicit online material and recreational attitudes toward sex. Journal of Communication, 56, 639–660. Scholar
  37. Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2010). Processes underlying the effects of adolescents’ use of sexually explicit internet material: the role of perceived realism. Communication Research, 37, 375–399. Scholar
  38. Sass, D. A., Schmitt, T. A., & Marsh, H. W. (2014). Evaluating model fit with ordered categorical data within a measurement invariance framework: a comparison of estimators. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21, 167–180. Scholar
  39. Savin-Williams, R. C., & Diamond, L. M. (2004). Sex. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (red.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pag. 189–231). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  40. Shulman, S., Scharf, M., Bohr, Y., Tuval-Mashiach, R. Hirsh, Y., & Faians, M. (2017). Adolescent romantic competence and parenting attitudes. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34, 594–614. Scholar
  41. Valkenburg, P. M., Krcmar, M., Peeters, A. L., & Marseille, N. M. (1999). Developing a scale to assess three styles of television mediation: ‘Instructive mediation,’ ‘restrictive mediation,’ and ‘social coviewing’. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43, 52–66. Scholar
  42. Valkenburg, P. M., Piotrowski, J. T., Hermanns, J., & De Leeuw, R. (2013). Developing and validating the perceived parental media mediation scale: a self-determination perspective. Human Communication Research, 39, 445–469. Scholar
  43. Vandenbosch, L., & Eggermont, S. (2013). Sexually explicit websites and sexual initiation: reciprocal relationships and the moderating role of pubertal status. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 621–634. Scholar
  44. Ward, M. L., & Wyatt, G. E. (1994). The effects of childhood sexual messages on African-American and white women’s adolescent sexual behavior. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 183–201. Scholar
  45. Weaver, H., Smith, G., & Kippax, S. (2005). School-based sex education policies and indicators of sexual health among young people: a comparison of the Netherlands, France, Australia and the United States. Sex Education, 5, 171–188. Scholar
  46. Wright, P. J. (2009). Sexual socialization messages in mainstream entertainment mass media: a review and synthesis. Sexuality and Culture, 13, 181–200. Scholar
  47. Zillman, D., & Bryant, J. (1985). Selective exposure to communication. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Bohn Stafleu van Loghum is een imprint van Springer Media B.V., onderdeel van Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Geertjan Overbeek
    • 1
    Email author
  • Daphne van de Bongardt
    • 2
  • Laura Baams
    • 3
  1. 1.Research Institute of Child Development and Education (RICDE)Universiteit van AmsterdamNG, postbus 15780Nederland
  2. 2.Erasmus Universiteit RotterdamRotterdamNederland
  3. 3.Rijksuniversiteit GroningenGroningenNederland

Personalised recommendations