Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Klinisch relevant en statistisch significant

  • Praktische epidemiologie
  • Published:
Huisarts en wetenschap Aims and scope

Samenvatting

Op het spreekuur komt een COPD-patiënt die een longrevalidatieprogramma heeft gevolgd. Hierbij werd de Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) afgenomen om te bepalen of zijn gezondheidsstatus is verbeterd. Vergeleken met het begin van het traject toonde de CCQ een verbetering van de totaalscore met één punt. Hoe moeten we dit interpreteren? Was het revalidatieprogramma succesvol? Is hier sprake van klinisch relevante verbetering?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatuur

  1. Westwood M, Bourbeau J, Jones PW, Cerulli A, Capkun-Niggli G, Worthy G. Relationship between FEV1 change and patient-reported outcomes in randomised trials of inhaled bronchodilators for stable COPD: a systematic review. Respir Res 2011;12:40.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Van der Molen T, Willemse BW, Schokker S, Ten Hacken NH, Postma DS, Juniper EF. Development, validity and responsiveness of the Clinical COPD Questionnaire. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003;1:13.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kon SS, Dilaver D, Mittal M, Nolan CM, Clark AL, Canavan JL, et al. The Clinical COPD Questionnaire: response to pulmonary rehabilitation and minimal clinically important difference. Thorax 2014;69:793–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status. ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials 1989;10:407–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kocks JW, Tuinenga MG, Uil SM, Van den Berg JW, Stahl E, Van der Molen T. Health status measurement in COPD: the minimal clinically important difference of the clinical COPD questionnaire. Respir Res 2006;7:62.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. afdeling Huisartsgeneeskunde, UMC Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

    Harma Alma

Authors
  1. Harma Alma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harma Alma.

Additional information

UMC Groningen, afdeling Huisartsgeneeskunde, Huispostcode FA21, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen: H.J. Alma, MSc - MD-PhD student

Correspondentie: h.j.alma@umcg.nl

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alma, H. Klinisch relevant en statistisch significant. Huisarts Wet 58, 577 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12445-015-0310-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12445-015-0310-3

Search

Navigation