Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Hope bias

  • Column
  • Published:
Huisarts en wetenschap Aims and scope

Samenvatting

Het protocol voor een wetenschappelijk onderzoek moet worden geschreven door een genie (u dus) maar het onderzoek moet worden uitgevoerd door een blind paard (uw vijand dus). Alleen zo kunt u vertekening, questionable research practices en fraude voorkomen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatuur

  1. Peto R. Failure of randomisation by ‘sealed’ envelope. Lancet 1999;354:73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sackett DL. Bias in analytic research. J Chronic Dis 1979;32:51–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Armitage P, Colton T. Encyclopedia of biostatistics. New York: Wiley, 2104. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/book/10.1002/0470011815.

  4. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cognitive_biases.

  5. Shun-Shin M, Francis DP. Why are some studies of cardiovascular markers unreliable? The role of measurement variability and what an aspiring clinician scientist can do before it is too late. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2012;55:14–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. http://www.bsl.nl

    Hans van Maanen

Authors
  1. Hans van Maanen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Hans van Maanen is wetenschapsjournalist.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

van Maanen, H. Hope bias. HUISARTS WETENSCHAP 57, 347 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12445-014-0178-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12445-014-0178-7

Search

Navigation