Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mannelijke genitaliën

  • Published:
Bijblijven

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figuur 1
Figuur 2
Figuur 3
Figuur 4
Figuur 5
Figuur 6
Figuur 7
Figuur 8
Figuur 9
Figuur 10
Figuur 11
Figuur 12
Figuur 13
Figuur 14

Literatuur

  1. Misra S, Chaturvedi A, Misra N. Penile carcinoma: a challenge for the developing world. Lancet Oncol 2004; 5: 240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bezooijen BPJ van, Wiersma Tj, Schlatmann TJM, Zwartendijk J. Compendium urologie. Utrecht, Nederlandse Vereniging voor Urologie, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Canales BK, Zapkalka DM, Ercole CJ, et al. Prevalence and Effect of varicoceles in an elderly population. Urology 2005; 66: 627-31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gat Y, Bachar GN, Zukerman Z, et al.Physical examination may miss the diagnosis of bilateral varicocele: a comparative study of 4 diagnostic modalities. J Urol 2004;172:1414-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dohle GR, Colpi GM, Hargreave TB, et al. EAU guidelines on male infertility. European Urology 2005; 48(5): 703-71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wolters RJ, Spigt MG, Reedt Dortland PFH van, et al. NHG-standaard Bemoeilijkte mictie bij oudere mannen. Huisarts Wet 2004;47 (12): 571- 86.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Catalona WJ, Ritchie JP, Ahman FR, et al. Comparison of digital rectal examination and serum prostate specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer: results of a multicenter clinical trial of 6.630 men. J Urolol 1994; 151: 1283.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yamanoto T, Ito K, Ohi M, Kubota Y. Diagnostic significance of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in men with prostatic-specific antigen levels of 4 NG/ML or less. Urology 2001; 58: 994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nelson CP, Williams JF, Bloom DA. The cremasteric reflex: a useful but imperfect sign in testicular torsion. J Pediatr Surg 2003; 38 (8): 1248-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yanoshak SJ, Roehrborn CG, Girman CJ, et al. Use of a prostatic model to assist in training for digital rectal examination. Urology 2000;55 (5): 690-3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kirby RS, Fitzpatrick P. Textbook of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. 1996, Informa Healthcare.

  12. Epstein JI. Pathology of prostatic neoplasia. In: Campbell#x2019;s Urology, 8th ed, Walsh PC (Ed), Saunders, Philadelphia 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smith DS, Catalona WJ. Interexaminer variability of digital rectal examination in detecting prostate cancer. Urology 1995: 45: 70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoogendam A, Buntinx F, De Vet HC. The diagnostic value of digital rectal examination in primary care screening for prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Fam Pract 1999;158:16;621-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Verder lezen

  • • Kramer WLM. Handleiding chirurgisch onderzoek. 3e druk 2006. Houten Bohn Stafleu van Loghum.

  • • Talley NJ, O’Connor S. Clinical examination. A Systematic Guide to Physical Diagnosis. Elsevier Australie, 5e druk 2006.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, The Netherlands

    T.O.H. de Jongh

  2. VU Medisch Centrum, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    A.P. Lont &  E.J.H. Meuleman

Authors
  1. T.O.H. de Jongh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A.P. Lont
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. E.J.H. Meuleman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Jongh, T., Lont, A. & Meuleman, E. Mannelijke genitaliën. Bijblijven 28, 28–41 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12414-012-0064-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12414-012-0064-9

Search

Navigation