Skip to main content
Log in

Echo-Based Hemodynamics to Help Guide Care in Cardiogenic Shock: a Review

  • Interesting Cases (Purvi Parwani and Mohammed Chamsi Pasha, Section Editors)
  • Published:
  • volume 15pages 57–67 (2022)
Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article


Purpose of Review

The purpose of this review is to discuss the value of echocardiography-based hemodynamic assessment for management of patients with acute heart failure and cardiogenic shock, with literature review of up-to-date clinical science in this area. To illustrate clinical utility, we describe a case of a 64-year-old male with cardiogenic shock requiring temporary mechanical support for whom echocardiography was used among other techniques for hemodynamic evaluation and management.

Recent Findings

There is a growing body of literature on the use of echocardiography for hemodynamic assessment of patients with acute heart failure and cardiogenic shock. This includes data on the use of well-established parameters such as assessment of volume status and cardiac output, as well as newer parameters including cardiac power output and pulmonary artery pulsatility index.


Echocardiography is a vital non-invasive tool for hemodynamic diagnosis and management of patients with acute heart failure and cardiogenic shock.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others


Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. • Zhang Y, Wang Y, Shi J, Hua Z, Xu J. Cardiac output measurements via echocardiography versus thermodilution: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0222105. This systematic review concluded there is no significant difference in cardiac output measurements between ultrasound and thermodilution.

  2. Stein JH, Neumann A, Preston LM, Costanzo MR, Parrillo JE, Johnson MR, et al. Echocardiography for hemodynamic assessment of patients with advanced heart failure and potential heart transplant recipients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:1765–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cordero-Caban K, Jolly G, Sakr A, Stoletniy L, Abramov D. Echocardiography-based hemodynamic monitoring use on inpatients listed for heart transplantation under 2018 allocation policy in United States. Transplant Proc. 2021;53:3036–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. • Iwano H, Utsunomiya H, Shibayama K, Tanaka H, Isotani A, Onishi T, et al. Results of PRospect trial to Elucidate the utility of EchocarDiography-based Cardiac ouTput in acute heart failure (PREDICT). J Cardiol. 2022;S0914–5087(22)00055–7. This prospective study assessed the utility of echo-based cardiac output measurement in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. The authors concluded that in patients with systolic heart failure, low cardiac output (measured using echo) in combination with physical exam was predictor of worsening heart failure.

  5. Omote K, Nagai T, Iwano H, Tsujinaga S, Kamiya K, Aikawa T, et al. Left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral in hospitalized heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. ESC Heart Failure. 2020;7:168–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tan C, Rubenson D, Srivastava A, Mohan R, Smith MR, Billick K, et al. Left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral outperforms ejection fraction and Doppler-derived cardiac output for predicting outcomes in a select advanced heart failure cohort. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2017;15:18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Mele D, Pestelli G, Molin DD, Trevisan F, Smarrazzo V, Luisi GA, et al. Echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular output in patients with heart failure: a per-beat or per-minute approach? J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2020;33:135–147.e3.

  8. • Jentzer JC, Tabi M, Wiley BM, Singam NSV, Anavekar NS. Echocardiographic correlates of mortality among cardiac intensive care unit patients with cardiogenic shock. Shock. 2022;57:336–43. This is a retrospective analysis to determine whether there is an association between echo findings and morality in patients admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit with cardiogenic shock. The authors concluded that early comprehensive echo, specifically LVOT VTI, was the single best predictor of hospital mortality, highlighting the important utility of echo in the management of patients with cardiogenic shock.

  9. Lamia B, Ochagavia A, Monnet X, Chemla D, Richard C, Teboul J-L. Echocardiographic prediction of volume responsiveness in critically ill patients with spontaneously breathing activity. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33:1125–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zoghbi WA, Quinones MA. Determination of cardiac output by Doppler echocardiography: a critical appraisal. Herz. 1986;11:258–68.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Seo Y, Iida N, Yamamoto M, Machino-Ohtsuka T, Ishizu T, Aonuma K. Estimation of central venous pressure using the ratio of short to long diameter from cross-sectional images of the inferior vena cava. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017;30:461–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Huguet R, Fard D, d’Humieres T, Brault-Meslin O, Faivre L, Nahory L, et al. Three-dimensional inferior vena cava for assessing central venous pressure in patients with cardiogenic shock. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2018;31:1034–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Brennan JM, Blair JE, Goonewardena S, Ronan A, Shah D, Vasaiwala S, et al. Reappraisal of the use of inferior vena cava for estimating right atrial pressure. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20:857–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. • Szymczyk T, Sauzet O, Paluszkiewicz LJ, Costard-Jäckle A, Potratz M, Rudolph V, et al. Non-invasive assessment of central venous pressure in heart failure: a systematic prospective comparison of echocardiography and Swan-Ganz catheter. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;36:1821–9. This is a systematic prospective review of IVC measurements to predict CVP, and the authors discovered a strong correlation with IVC diameter and CVP, especially when CVP > 10 mmHg.

  15. Via G, Tavazzi G, Price S. Ten situations where inferior vena cava ultrasound may fail to accurately predict fluid responsiveness: a physiologically based point of view. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42:1164–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. • Griffin M, Ivey-Miranda J, McCallum W, Sarnak M, Eder M, Bellumkonda L, et al. Inferior vena cava diameter measurement provides distinct and complementary information to right atrial pressure in acute decompensated heart failure. J Card Fail. 2022;S1071–9164(22)00107–5. This study was conducted to determine if there is a correlation between IVC and RAP. Although there is limited correlation between RA pressure estimate via IVC and that measured by invasive techniques, the two parameters may be complementary with IVC-derived estimates being more representative of changes in intravascular volume status.

  17. Fletcher AJ, Robinson S, Rana BS. Echocardiographic RV-E/e’ for predicting right atrial pressure: a review. Echo Res Pract. 2020;7:R11-20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Mitchell C, Rahko PS, Blauwet LA, Canaday B, Finstuen JA, Foster MC, et al. Guidelines for performing a comprehensive transthoracic echocardiographic examination in adults: recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2019;32:1–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Miah N, Faxén UL, Lund LH, Venkateshvaran A. Diagnostic utility of right atrial reservoir strain to identify elevated right atrial pressure in heart failure. Int J Cardiol. 2021;324:227–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vaidya GN, Ghafghazi S. Correlation of internal jugular and subclavian vein diameter variation on bedside ultrasound with invasive right heart catheterization. Indian Heart J. 2021;73:231–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Beaubien-Souligny W, Rola P, Haycock K, Bouchard J, Lamarche Y, Spiegel R, et al. Quantifying systemic congestion with point-of-care ultrasound: development of the venous excess ultrasound grading system. Ultrasound J. 2020;12:16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Santas E, García-Blas S, Miñana G, Sanchis J, Bodí V, Escribano D, et al. Prognostic implications of tissue Doppler imaging-derived e/ea ratio in acute heart failure patients. Echocardiography. 2015;32:213–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nagueh SF, Middleton KJ, Kopelen HA, Zoghbi WA, Quiñones MA. Doppler tissue imaging: a noninvasive technique for evaluation of left ventricular relaxation and estimation of filling pressures. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:1527–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. • Jones R, Varian F, Alabed S, Morris P, Rothman A, Swift AJ, et al. Meta-analysis of echocardiographic quantification of left ventricular filling pressure. ESC Heart Fail. 2021;8:566–76. This study is systematic review and meta-analysis of studies done to estimate left ventricle filling pressures using echocardiography. In patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, no echo indices were able to predict LV filling pressure. However, in patients with reduced systolic LV function, mitral in-flow-derived indices correlated with invasively measured LV filling pressure.

  25. Vaidya GN, Abramov D. Echocardiographic evaluation of diastolic function is of limited value in the diagnosis and management of HFpEF. J Card Fail. 2018;24:392–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sunderji I, Singh V, Fraser AG. When does the E/e’ index not work? The pitfalls of oversimplifying diastolic function. Echocardiography. 2020;37:1897–907.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. • Porter TR, Shillcutt SK, Adams MS, Desjardins G, Glas KE, Olson JJ, et al. Guidelines for the use of echocardiography as a monitor for therapeutic intervention in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28:40–56. This guideline summarizes recommendation for the use of echocardiography to monitor patients with heart failure.

  28. • Pressman GS, Ranjan R, Olex S. A simple technique for bedside estimation of left atrial pressure. Echocardiography. 2019;36:1972–8. This study demonstrated a correlation between central systolic blood pressure with peak LV-LA gradient by bedside echo and invasively measured left atrial pressure.

  29. Hubert A, Girerd N, Le Breton H, Galli E, Latar I, Fournet M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound for identification of elevated left ventricular filling pressure. Int J Cardiol. 2019;281:62–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Reynolds HR, Anand SK, Fox JM, Harkness S, Dzavik V, White HD, et al. Restrictive physiology in cardiogenic shock: observations from echocardiography. Am Heart J. 2006;151(890):e9-15.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Simonneau G, Montani D, Celermajer DS, Denton CP, Gatzoulis MA, Krowka M, et al. Haemodynamic definitions and updated clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J. 2019;53:1801913.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Rudski LG, Lai WW, Afilalo J, Hua L, Handschumacher MD, Chandrasekaran K, et al. Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography endorsed by the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23:685–713; quiz 786–8.

  33. Tran T, Mudigonda P, Mahr C, Kirkpatrick J. Echocardiographic imaging of temporary percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices. J Echocardiogr. 2022;

  34. Rao P, Khalpey Z, Smith R, Burkhoff D, Kociol RD. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest: cardinal considerations for initiation and management. Circ: Heart Failure. 2018;11:e004905. This study demonstrated a correlation between echo-derived pulmonary artery pulsatility index and invasively measured PAPi in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Further, low estimated PAPi by echo was associated with poor outcomes.

  35. Tycińska A, Grygier M, Biegus J, Czarnik T, Dąbrowski M, Depukat R, et al. Mechanical circulatory support. An expert opinion of the Association of Intensive Cardiac Care and the Association of Cardiovascular Interventions of the Polish Cardiac Society. Kardiol Pol. 2021;79:1399–410.

  36. Cooper HA, Najafi AH, Ghafourian K, Paixao AR, Aljaabari M, Iantorno M, et al. Diagnosis of cardiogenic shock without the use of a pulmonary artery catheter. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2015;4:88–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Jentzer JC, Wiley BM, Anavekar NS, Pislaru SV, Mankad SV, Bennett CE, et al. Noninvasive hemodynamic assessment of shock severity and mortality risk prediction in the cardiac intensive care unit. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021;14:321–32.

  38. Kochav SM, Flores RJ, Truby LK, Topkara VK. Prognostic impact of pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) in patients with advanced heart failure: insights from the ESCAPE trial. J Card Fail. 2018;24:453–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. • Boretto P, Gravinese C, Frea S, Pidello S, De Ferrari G. Echocardiographic-derived pulmonary artery pulsatility index: towards non-invasive evaluation of right ventricular function. Eur Heart J - Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022;23:jeab289.385. In patients with systolic heart failure, this study demonstrated good correlation between echocardiographic derived PAPi and invasively derived PAPi.

  40. Kang G, Ha R, Banerjee D. Pulmonary artery pulsatility index predicts right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016;35:67–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. • Burstein B, Anand V, Ternus B, Tabi M, Anavekar NS, Borlaug BA, et al. Noninvasive echocardiographic cardiac power output predicts mortality in cardiac intensive care unit patients. Am Heart J. 2022;245:149–59. Echocardiographic cardiac power output was inversely associated with hospital mortality in patients admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dmitry Abramov.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

All reported studies/experiments with human or animal subjects performed by the authors have been previously published and complied with all applicable ethical standards (including the Helsinki declaration and its amendments, institutional/national research committee standards, and international/national/institutional guidelines).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Interesting Cases

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohammad, A., Karamat, S., Majeed, Y. et al. Echo-Based Hemodynamics to Help Guide Care in Cardiogenic Shock: a Review. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep 15, 57–67 (2022).

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: