Mechanisms of Stent Failure: Lessons from IVUS and OCT
- 69 Downloads
Purpose of Review
Despite significant advances in stent design and procedural technique, stent failure remains the “Achilles’ heel” of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). It is important to understand the mechanism of stent failure to prevent major adverse events and improve clinical outcomes.
Two-dimensional angiography alone is insufficient for elucidating the etiology of stent failure. Intracoronary imaging modalities, including intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) have evolved to guide optimal stent placement during PCI, and have enabled identification of the etiology behind stent failure.
In this review, we discuss the mechanisms of stent failure, use and limitations of intracoronary imaging (IVUS and OCT) to assess its etiology, and future directions for its use in patients undergoing coronary stent implantation.
KeywordsStent failure Percutaneous coronary intervention Intravascular ultrasound Optical coherence tomography In-stent restenosis Stent thrombosis
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
All authors declare no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 4.Prati F, Kodama T, Romagnoli E, Gatto L, di Vito L, Ramazzotti V, et al. Suboptimal stent deployment is associated with subacute stent thrombosis: optical coherence tomography insights from a multicenter matched study. From the CLI Foundation investigators: the CLI-THRO study. Am Heart J. 2015;169:249–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.•• Group ESCSD, Koskinas KC, Räber L, et al. Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 1: guidance and optimization of coronary interventions. An expert consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:3281–300. This expert consensus document is a must read for guidance on optimization of coronary interventions. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Serruys PW, Kay IP, Disco C, Deshpande NV, de Feyter PJ. Periprocedural quantitative coronary angiography after Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation predicts the restenosis rate at six months: results of a meta-analysis of the BElgian NEtherlands Stent study (BENESTENT) I, BENESTENT II Pilot, BENESTENT II and MUSIC trials. Multicenter Ultrasound Stent In Coronaries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34:1067–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Choi SY, Witzenbichler B, Maehara A, Lansky AJ, Guagliumi G, Brodie B, et al. Intravascular ultrasound findings of early stent thrombosis after primary percutaneous intervention in acute myocardial infarction: a Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction (HORIZONS-AMI) substudy. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:239–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Adriaenssens T, Joner M, Godschalk TC, Malik N, Alfonso F, Xhepa E, et al. Optical coherence tomography findings in patients with coronary stent thrombosis: a report of the PRESTIGE Consortium (Prevention of Late Stent Thrombosis by an Interdisciplinary Global European Effort). Circulation. 2017;136:1007–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.Doi H, Maehara A, Mintz GS, Yu A, Wang H, Mandinov L, et al. Impact of post-intervention minimal stent area on 9-month follow-up patency of paclitaxel-eluting stents: an integrated intravascular ultrasound analysis from the TAXUS IV, V, and VI and TAXUS ATLAS Workhorse, Long Lesion, and Direct Stent Trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2:1269–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 44.Xhepa E, Byrne RA, Rivero F, et al. Qualitative and quantitative neointimal characterization by optical coherence tomography in patients presenting with in-stent restenosis. Clin Res Cardiol. 2019.Google Scholar
- 46.• Kubo T, Shinke T, Okamura T, Hibi K, Nakazawa G, Morino Y, et al. Optical frequency domain imaging vs. intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention (OPINION trial): one-year angiographic and clinical results. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:3139–47. This randomized trial showed non-inferiority of OCT to IVUS for target vessel failure 12 months post PCI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 54.Costa MA, Angiolillo DJ, Tannenbaum M, Driesman M, Chu A, Patterson J, et al. Impact of stent deployment procedural factors on long-term effectiveness and safety of sirolimus-eluting stents (final results of the multicenter prospective STLLR trial). Am J Cardiol. 2008;101:1704–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 66.Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, Bailey SR, Bittl JA, Cercek B, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:e44–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 67.Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2541–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar