Skip to main content
Log in

Advances in CMR of Post-ablation Atrial Injury

  • Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (E Nagel and V Puntmann, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Technical advancements in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging over the past two decades have allowed clinically useful imaging of the thin atrial wall for the first time. During this period, there has been a parallel increase in the use of catheter ablation to treat atrial fibrillation (AF). These developments have led to new indications for and increasing use of CMR in the assessment of pre- and post-ablation atrial structure and function and their potential link to arrhythmia substrate. This review focuses on the role of CMR in the assessment of acute and chronic post-ablation atrial tissue characterisation and its potential use in the treatment of atrial arrhythmias.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Lardo AC, Mcveigh ER, Jumrussirikul P, Berger RD, Calkins H, Halperin HR. Visualization and temporal/spatial characterization of cardiac radiofrequency ablation lesions using magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2000;102:698–705.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dickfeld T, Kato R, Zviman M, Lai S, Meininger G, Lardo AC, et al. Characterization of radiofrequency ablation lesions with gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:370–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dickfeld T, Kato R, Zviman M, Nazarian S, Dong J, Ashikaga H, et al. Characterization of acute and subacute radiofrequency ablation lesions with nonenhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Heart Rhythm. 2007;4:208–14.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vergara GR, Vijayakumar S, Kholmovski EG, Blauer JJEE, Guttman MA, Gloschat C, et al. Real-time MRI guided radiofrequency atrial ablation and visualization of lesion formation at 3-tesla. Hear Rhythm. Elsevier Inc.; 2011;8:295–303.

  5. Nordbeck P, Hiller K-H, Fidler F, Warmuth M, Burkard N, Nahrendorf M, et al. Feasibility of contrast-enhanced and nonenhanced MRI for intraprocedural and postprocedural lesion visualization in interventional electrophysiology: animal studies and early delineation of isthmus ablation lesions in patients with typical atrial flutter. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4:282–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ranjan R, Kholmovski EG, Blauer J, Vijayakumar S, Volland NA, Salama ME, et al. Identification and acute targeting of gaps in atrial ablation lesion sets using a real-time magnetic resonance imaging system. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012;5:1130–5. A study demonstrating the ability of real time magnetic resonance imaging to guide radiofrequency ablation. This study provides compelling experimental evidence justifying the trial of real time CMR in human studies, which are currently underway.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Harrison JL, Jensen HK, Peel SA, Chiribiri A, Grøndal AK, Bloch LØ, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance and electroanatomical mapping of acute and chronic atrial ablation injury: a histological validation study. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:1486–95. The first correlation of magnetic resonance imaging data with a comprehensive histopathological tissue assessment in a bovine model. This work identified the role of T2 weighted imaging and LGE in the quantitative assessment of acute and chronic atrial scar.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Peters DC, Wylie JV, Hauser TH, Nezafat R, Han Y, Woo JJ, et al. Recurrence of atrial fibrillation correlates with the extent of post-procedural late gadolinium enhancement: a pilot study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. Elsevier Inc.; 2009;2:308–16.

  9. Peters DC, Wylie JV, Hauser TH, Kissinger KV, Josephson ME, Manning WJ. Detection of pulmonary vein and left atrial scar after catheter ablation with three-dimensional navigator-gated delayed enhancement mr imaging: methods: results: conclusion. 2007;243

  10. Knowles BR, Caulfield D, Cooklin M, Rinaldi CA, Gill J, Bostock J, et al. 3-D visualization of acute RF ablation lesions using MRI for the simultaneous determination of the patterns of necrosis and edema. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010;57:1467–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Arujuna A, Karim R, Caulfield D, Knowles B, Rhode K, Schaeffter T, et al. Acute pulmonary vein isolation is achieved by a combination of reversible and irreversible atrial injury after catheter ablation: evidence from magnetic resonance imaging. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012;5:691–700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Badger TJ, Daccarett M, Akoum NW, Adjei-Poku YA, Burgon NS, Haslam TS, et al. Evaluation of left atrial lesions after initial and repeat atrial fibrillation ablation: lessons learned from delayed-enhancement MRI in repeat ablation procedures. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010;3:249–59.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Badger TJ, Oakes RS, Daccarett M, Burgon NS, Akoum N, Fish EN, et al. Temporal left atrial lesion formation after ablation of atrial fibrillation. HRTHM. Heart Rhythm Society; 2009;6:161–68.

  14. McGann CJ, Kholmovski EG, Oakes RS, Blauer JJE, Daccarett M, Segerson N, et al. New magnetic resonance imaging-based method for defining the extent of left atrial wall injury after the ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:1263–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bisbal F, Guiu E, Cabanas-Grandío P, Berruezo A, Prat-Gonzalez S, Vidal B, et al. CMR-guided approach to localize and ablate gaps in repeat AF ablation procedure. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:653–63. This study raises the novel possibility of purely CMR guided ablation of atrial fibrillation. If successfully reproduced, the results suggest the prospect of a purely imaging guided approach to the ablation of atrial fibrillation.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Khurram IM, Beinart R, Zipunnikov V, Dewire J, Yarmohammadi H, Sasaki T, et al. Magnetic resonance image intensity ratio, a normalized measure to enable interpatient comparability of left atrial fibrosis. Heart Rhythm. Elsevier; 2014;11:85–92.

  17. Oakes RS, Badger TJ, Kholmovski EG, Akoum N, Burgon NS, Fish EN, et al. Detection and quantification of left atrial structural remodeling with delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2009;119:1758–67.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Badger TJ, Adjei-Poku YA, Burgon NS, Kalvaitis S, Shaaban A, Sommers DN, et al. Initial experience of assessing esophageal tissue injury and recovery using delayed-enhancement MRI after atrial fibrillation ablation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009;2:620–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mcgann C, Kholmovski E, Blauer J, Vijayakumar S, Haslam T, Cates J, et al. Dark regions of no-reflow on late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging result in scar formation after atrial fibrillation ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol. Elsevier Inc.; 2011;58:177–85.

  20. Spragg DD, Khurram I, Zimmerman SL, Yarmohammadi H, Barcelon B, Needleman M, et al. Initial experience with magnetic resonance imaging of atrial scar and co-registration with electroanatomic voltage mapping during atrial fibrillation: success and limitations. Hear Rhythm. 2012;9:2003–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sohns C, Karim R, Harrison J, Arujuna A, Linton N, Sennett R, et al. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging analysis of the relationship between contact force and left atrial scar formation after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25:138–45.

  22. Badger TJ, Oakes RS, Daccarett M, Burgon NS, Akoum N, Fish EN, et al. Temporal left atrial lesion formation after ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. Heart Rhythm Society; 2009;6:161–68.

  23. Sohns C, Karim R, Harrison J, Arujuna A, Linton N, Sennett R, et al. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging analysis of the relationship between contact force and left atrial scar formation after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;138–45.

  24. Segerson NM, Daccarett M, Badger TJ, Shabaan A, Akoum NW, Fish EN, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-confirmed ablative debulking of the left atrial posterior wall and septum for treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation: rationale and initial experience. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010;21:126–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Akoum NW, Daccarett M, McGann C, Segerson N, Vergara GR, Kuppahally S, et al. Atrial fibrosis helps select the appropriate patient and strategy in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a DE-MRI guided approach. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2011;22:16–22.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Judd RM, Lugo-Olivieri CH, Arai M, Kondo T, Croisille P, Lima JAC, et al. Physiological basis of myocardial contrast enhancement in fast magnetic resonance images of 2-day-old reperfused canine infarcts. Circulation. 1995;92:1902–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Malcolme-Lawes LC, Juli C, Karim R, Bai W, Quest R, Lim PB, et al. Automated analysis of atrial late gadolinium enhancement imaging that correlates with endocardial voltage and clinical outcomes: a 2-center study. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10:1184–91.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Harrison JL, Sohns C, Linton NW, Karim R, Williams SE, Rhode KS, et al. Repeat left atrial catheter ablation: cardiac magnetic resonance prediction of endocardial voltage and gaps in ablation lesion sets. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015.

  29. Hunter RJ, Jones DA, Boubertakh R, Malcolme-Lawes LC, Kanagaratnam P, Juli CF, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection and characterization of left atrial catheter ablation lesions: a multicenter experience. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;24:396–403. This study demonstrates that when examining CMR imaging taken post ablation, LGE scar imaging is not yet accurate enough to reliably identify ablation lesions or determine their distribution. This important study from two centres of excellence raises a note of caution in the interpretation of the growing body of work reporting increasingly accurate scar identification using CMR.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was funded/supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Clinical Research Facility at Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre based at Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

JL Harrison, J Whitaker, H Chubb, SE Williams, M Wright, RS Razavi and MD O’Neill all declare no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark D. O’Neill.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harrison, J.L., Whitaker, J., Chubb, H. et al. Advances in CMR of Post-ablation Atrial Injury. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep 8, 22 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12410-015-9336-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12410-015-9336-y

Keywords

Navigation