Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Use of Computed Tomography Prior to TAVR: Prediction and Prevention of Complications and Impact on Outcomes

  • Cardiac Computed Tomography (S Achenbach and T Villines, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cardiac CT is increasingly being utilized as an essential component of the work-up for transcatheter valve replacement. The article reviews the most contemporary published literature on the strengths of cardiac CT for predicting and minimizing adverse procedural outcomes, including aortic annular rupture, paravalvular leak, conduction disturbance, and coronary obstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Figs. 3–6
Figs. 7 and 8
Figs. 9–11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Kanu C, et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2006;114:e84–e231.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vahanian A, Baumgartner H, Bax J, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease: the task force on the management of valvular heart disease of the European society of cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:230–68.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Webb JG, Wood DA. Current status of transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:483–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Moat NE, Ludman P, de Belder MA, et al. Long-term outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: the U.K. TAVI (United Kingdom Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:2130–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kodali SK, Williams MR, Smith CR, et al. Two-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:18. Long term-follow-up data from PARTNER, confirming that paravalvular regurgitation is associated with increased late mortality at 2 years.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ng ACT, Delgado V, van der Kley F, et al. Comparison of aortic root dimensions and geometries pre- and post-transcatheter aortic valve implantation by 2- and 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography and multi-slice computed tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3:94–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Messika-Zeitoun D, Serfaty J-M, Brochet E, et al. Multimodal assessment of the aortic annulus diameter: implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:186–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tzikas A, Schultz CJ, Piazza N, et al. Assessment of the aortic annulus by multislice computed tomography, contrast aortography, and trans-thoracic echocardiography in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;77:868–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang R, Song Y, Zhou Y, et al. Comparison of aortic annulus diameter measurement between multi-detector computed tomography and echocardiography: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8:e58729. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0058729.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bloomfield GS, Gillam LD, Hahn RT, et al. A practical guide to multimodality imaging of transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC. 2012;5:441–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tops LF, Wood DA, Delgado V, et al. Noninvasive evaluation of the aortic root with multislice computed tomography implications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC. 2008;1:321–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cerillo AG, Mariani M, Berti S, et al. Sizing the aortic annulus. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;1:245–6.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Willson AB, Webb JG, LaBounty TM, et al. 3-dimensional aortic annular assessment by multidetector computed tomography predicts moderate or severe paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: implications for sizing of transcatheter heart valves. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:1287–94. Multicenter retrospective analysis confirming both the reproducibility of CT based annular measurements, and confirming their ability to predict PAR.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hamdan A, Guetta V, Konen E, et al. Deformation dynamics and mechanical properties of the aortic annulus by 4-dimensional computed tomography: insights into the functional anatomy of the aortic valve complex and implications for transcatheter aortic valve therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:119–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jilaihawi H, Kashif M, Fontana G, et al. Cross-sectional computed tomographic assessment improves accuracy of aortic annular sizing for transcatheter aortic valve replacement and reduces the incidence of paravalvular aortic regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:1275–86. Single center retrospective analysis showing superiority of CT over 2D echo to predict PAR.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gurvitch R, Webb JG, Yuan R, et al. Aortic annulus diameter determination by multidetector computed tomography: reproducibility, applicability, and implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2011;4:1235–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mylotte D, Dorfmeister M, Elhmidi Y, et al. TCT-745 CoreValve oversizing using multislice computed tomography and clinical outcomes: a comparison with transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(18 Suppl 1):B227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Blanke P, Russe M, Leipsic J, et al. Conformational pulsatile changes of the aortic annulus: impact on prosthesis sizing by computed tomography for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;9:984–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Blanke P, Siepe M, Reino J, et al. Assessment of aortic annulus dimensions for Edwards SAPIEN Transapical Heart Valve implantation by computed tomography: calculating average diameter using a virtual ring method. Eur J Cardio-Thor Surg. 2010;38:750–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1597–607.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ, et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2187–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kodali SK, Williams MR, Smith CR, et al. Two-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1686–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Généreux P, Head SJ, Hahn R, et al. Paravalvular leak after transcatheter aortic valve replacement the new ‘Achilles’ heel? A comprehensive review of the literature. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:1125–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Athappan G, Patvardhan E, Tuzcu EM, et al. Incidence, predictors, and outcomes of aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: meta-analysis and systematic review of literature. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:1585–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gotzmann M, Pljakic A, Bojara W, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis—predictors of mortality and poor treatment response. Am Heart J. 2011;162:238–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Binder R, Webb JG, Willson A, et al. The impact of integration of a multidetector computed tomography annulus area sizing algorithm on outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a prospective, multicenter, controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(5):431–8. The first prospective randomized data available on sizing strategies, which demonstrated a reduction in PAR with the routine use of CT to guide prosthesis sizing.

  27. Blanke P, Reinohl J, Schlensak C, et al. Prosthesis oversizing in balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation is associated with contained rupture of the aortic root. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:540–638.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Barbanti M, Yang TH, Rodès Cabau J, et al. Anatomical and procedural features associated with aortic root rupture during balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Circulation. 2013;128:244–53. A retrospective analysis further elucidating the factors associated with annular rupture.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kasel AM, Cassese S, et al. Standardized imaging for aortic annular sizing: implications for transcatheter valve selection; JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2013;6:249–62.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mylotte D, Martucci G, Piazza N. Patient selection for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: an interventional cardiology perspective. Ann Cardiol Thorac Surg. 2012;1:206–15.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Barbanti M, Leipsic J, et al. Underexpansion and ad hoc post-dilation in selected patients undergoing balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013. pii: S0735-1097(13)05748-3

  32. Sherif MA, Abdel-Wahab M, Stocker B, et al. Anatomic and procedural predictors of paravalvular aortic regurgitation after implantation of the Medtronic CoreValve bioprosthesis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:1623–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Koos R, Mahnken AH, Dohmen G, et al. Association of aortic valve calcification severity with the degree of aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Int J Cardiol. 2011;150:142–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Feuchtner G, Plank F, et al. Prediction of paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation by computed tomography: value of aortic valve and annular calcification. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96:1574–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Leipsic J, Yang T, Min J. Computed tomographic imaging of transcatheter aortic valve replacement for prediction and prevention of procedural complications. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:597–605.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ribeiro HB, Nombela-Franco L, Urena M, et al. Coronary obstruction following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6:452–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ribeiro HB, Webb JG, Makkar RR, et al. Predictive factors, management and clinical outcomes of coronary obstruction following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: insights from a large multicenter registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.040. Analysis of the clinical outcomes and risk factors of intraoperative coronary obstruction.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Fraccaro C, Napodano M, Tarantin G. Conduction disorders in the setting of transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a clinical perspective. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;81:1217–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Rubín JM, Avanzas P, del Valle R, et al. Atrioventricular conduction disturbance characterization in transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the CoreValve prosthesis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:280–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bapat V, Mydin I, et al. A guide to fluoroscopic identification and design of bioprosthetic valves: a reference for valve-in-valve procedure. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;81:853–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Dvir D, Webb J, Brecker S, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement for degenerative bioprosthetic surgical valves: results from the global valve-in-valve registry. Circulation. 2012;126:2335–44. Initial results from the global registry of valve-in-valve implantation.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Achenbach S, Delgado V, Hausleiter J, et al. SCCT expert consensus document on computed tomography imaging before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)/transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) J Cardiovasc Comput Tomog. 2012;6.

Download references

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

ᅟ

Conflict of Interest

Adam Berger declare that he has no conflict of interest.

Dr. Leipsic is a consultant for Edwards Lifesciences and provides CT Core Laboratory Services for Edwards Lifesciences as well.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Heart Valve Innovation, St Paul’s Hospital, 1081 Burrard St, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada

    Adam Berger & Jonathon Leipsic

Authors
  1. Adam Berger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jonathon Leipsic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathon Leipsic.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Cardiac Computed Tomography

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Berger, A., Leipsic, J. The Use of Computed Tomography Prior to TAVR: Prediction and Prevention of Complications and Impact on Outcomes. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep 7, 9272 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12410-014-9272-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12410-014-9272-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation