Abstract
Several approaches in the past have aimed to combine anatomical and functional information about the myocardium in an effort to identify significant coronary artery disease and characterize ischemic heart disease. Recent developments in CT-technology have permitted the expansion of cardiac CT into new territories beyond coronary artery visualization. Introduction of dual-energy CT has demonstrated the ability to evaluate coronary anatomy, myocardial ischemia, and viability. It now appears possible to provide a comprehensive evaluation of ischemic heart disease through a single, stand-alone imaging modality. The presented review emphasizes the promising potential of cardiac dual-energy CT in clinical practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •• Of major importance
Zaret BL, Strauss HW, Martin ND, et al. Noninvasive regional myocardial perfusion with radioactive potassium. Study of patients at rest, with exercise and during angina pectoris. N Engl J Med. 1973;288(16):809–12.
Strauss HW, Harrison K, Langan JK, et al. Thallium-201 for myocardial imaging. Relation of thallium-201 to regional myocardial perfusion. Circulation. 1975;51(4):641–5.
Johnson TR, Krauss B, Sedlmair M, et al. Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience. Eur Radiol. 2007;17(6):1510–7.
Graser A, Johnson TR, Bader M, et al. Dual energy CT characterization of urinary calculi: initial in vitro and clinical experience. Invest Radiol. 2008;43(2):112–9.
Schwarz F, Ruzsics B, Schoepf UJ, et al. Dua-energy CT of the heart–principles and protocols. Eur J Radiol. 2008;68:423–33.
Heijenbrok-Kal MH, Fleischmann KE, Hunink MG. Stress echocardiography, stress single-photon-emission computed tomography and electron beam computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of diagnostic performance. Am Heart J. 2007;154(3):415–23.
Scanlon PJ, Faxon DP, Audet AM, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). Developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33(6):1756–824.
Kern MJ, Samady H. Current concepts of integrated coronary physiology in the catheterization laboratory. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:173–85.
Ruzsics B, Lee H, Powers ER, et al. Images in cardiovascular medicine. Myocardial ischemia diagnosed by dual-energy computed tomography: correlation with single-photon emission computed tomography. Circulation. 2008;117:1244–5.
Gudmundsson P, Shahgaldi K, Winter R, et al. Parametric quantification of myocardial ischaemia using real-time perfusion adenosine stress echocardiography images, with SPECT as reference method. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2010;30(1):30–42.
Berman DS, Kiat HS, Van Train KF, et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging with technetium-99 m-sestamibi: comparative analysis of available imaging protocols. J Nucl Med. 1994;35(4):681–8.
Tadehara F, Yamamoto H, Tsujiyama S, et al. Feasibility of a rapid protocol of 1-day single-isotope rest/adenosine stress Tc-99 m sestamibi ECG-gated myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2008;15(1):35–41.
Nagel E, Lehmkuhl HB, Bocksch W, et al. Noninvasive diagnosis of ischemia-induced wall motion abnormalities with the use of high-dose dobutamine stress MRI: comparison with dobutamine stress echocardiography. Circulation. 1999;99(6):763–70.
Al-Saadi N, Nagel E, Gross M, et al. Noninvasive detection of myocardial ischemia from perfusion reserve based on cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation. 2000;101(12):1379–83.
Kang DK, Schoepf UJ, Bastarrika G, et al. Dual-energy computed tomography for integrative imaging of coronary artery disease: principles and clinical applications. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2010;31:276–91.
Vliegenthart R, Pelgrim GJ, Ebersberger U, et al. Dual-energy CT of the heart. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199(5 Suppl):S54–63.
Wang R, Yu W, Wang Y, et al. Incremental value of dual-energy CT to coronary CT angiography for the detection of significant coronary stenosis: comparison with quantitative coronary angiography and single photon emission computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;27:647–56.
Weininger M, Schoepf UJ, Ramachandra A, et al. Adenosine-stress dynamic real-time myocardial perfusion CT and adenosine-stress first-pass dual-energy myocardial perfusion CT for the assessment of acute chest pain: initial results. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(12):3703–10.
Ko SM, Choi JW, Song MG, et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging using adenosine-induced stress dual-energy computed tomography of the heart: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and conventional coronary angiography. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:26–35.
•• Ko SM, Choi JW, Hwang HK, et al. Diagnostic performance of combined noninvasive anatomic and functional assessment with dual-source CT and adenosine-induced stress dual-energy CT for detection of significant coronary stenosis. AJR. 2012;198:512–20. Combined results of adenosine stress dual energy CT and coronary CTA help to improve the prediction of hemodinamically significant coronary artery disease.
Ruzsics B, Schwarz F, Schoepf UJ, et al. Comparison of dual-energy computed tomography of the heart with single photon emission computed tomography for assessment of coronary artery stenosis and of the myocardial blood supply. Am J Cardiol. 2009;104:318–26.
Baile EM, Pare PD, D'Yachkova Y, Carere RG. Effect of contrast media on coronary vascular resistance: contrast-induced coronary vasodilation. Chest. 1999;116:1039–45.
Gould RG, Lipton MJ, McNamara MT, et al. Measurement of regional myocardial blood flow in dogs by ultrafast CT. Invest Radiol. 1988;23:348–53.
Bell MR, Lerman LO, Rumberger JA. Validation of minimally invasive measurement of myocardial perfusion using electron beam computed tomography and application in human volunteers. Heart. 1999;81:628–35.
Nikolaou K, Knez A, Sagmeister S, et al. Assessment of myocardial infarctions using multidetector-row computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2004;28:286–92.
Rubinshtein R, Miller TD, Williamson EE, et al. Detection of myocardial infarction by dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography using quantitated myocardial scintigraphy as the reference standard. Heart. 2009;95:1419–22.
McNamara MT, Higgins CB, Ehman RL, et al. Acute myocardial ischemia: magnetic resonance contrast enhancement with gadolinium-DTPA. Radiology. 1984;153(1):157–63.
Jennings RB, Murry CE, Steenbergen CJ. Reimer KA Development of cell injury in sustained acute ischemia. Circulation. 1990;82(3 Suppl):II2–12.
Jennings RB, Schaper J, Hill ML, et al. Effect of reperfusion late in the phase of reversible ischemic injury. Changes in cell volume, electrolytes, metabolites, and ultrastructure. Circ Res. 1985;56:262–78.
Gerber BL, Belge B, Legros GJ, et al. Characterization of acute and chronic myocardial infarcts by multidetector computed tomography: comparison with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance. Circulation. 2006;113:823–33.
Zhang LJ, Peng J, Wu SY, et al. Dual source dual-energy computed tomography of acute myocardial infarction: correlation with histopathologic findings in a canine model. Invest Radiol. 2010;45(6):290–7.
Deseive S, Bauer RW, Lehmann R, et al. Dual-energy computed tomography for the detection of late enhancement in reperfused chronic infarction: a comparison to magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology in a porcine model. Invest Radiol. 2011;46(7):450–6.
Kerl JM, Deseive S, Tandi C, et al. Dual energy CT for the assessment of reperfused chronic infarction: a feasibility study in a porcine model. Acta Radiol. 2011;52:834–9.
Ruzsics B, Chiaramida SA, Schoepf UJ. Images in cardiology: dual-energy computed tomography imaging of myocardial infarction. Heart. 2009;95(3):180.
Bauer RW, Kerl JM, Fischer N, et al. Dual-energy CT for the assessment of chronic myocardial infarction in patients with chronic coronary artery disease: comparison with 3-T MRI. AJR. 2010;195:639–46.
Nance Jr JW, Bastarrika G, Kang DK, et al. High-temporal resolution dual-energy computed tomography of the heart using a novel hybrid image reconstruction algorithm: initial experience. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2011;35:119–25.
Kerl JM, Bauer RW, Maurer TB, et al. Dose levels at coronary CT angiography-a comparison of dual energy-, dual source- and 16-slice CT. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:530–7.
Schwarz F, Nance Jr JW, Ruzsics B, et al. Quantification of coronary artery calcium on the basis of dual-energy coronary CT angiography. Radiology. 2012;264(3):700–7.
Kolodgie FD, Virmani R, Burke AP, et al. Pathologic assessment of the vulnerable human coronary plaque. Heart. 2004;90:1385–91.
Conflict of Interest
Balazs Ruzsics declares no conflict of interest.
Lucas L. Geyer has served on speakers’ bureaus for GE Healthcare, Germany.
Justin R. Silverman declares no conflict of interest.
Aleksander W. Krazinski declares no conflict of interest.
U. Joseph Schoepf has been a consultant to Bayer, Bracco, GE, Medrad, and Siemens.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ruzsics, B., Geyer, L.L., Silverman, J.R. et al. Dual Energy CT of the Heart: Current Status and Future Applications. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep 6, 228–239 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12410-013-9197-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12410-013-9197-1