Skip to main content
Log in

Myocarditis: Update and Critical Assessment

  • Published:
Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Myocarditis is most commonly caused by a viral infection. Most cases are subclinical or only mildly symptomatic; however, patients can also present with heart failure, sudden cardiac death, or chest pain. Traditional noninvasive diagnostic tests are limited by a low sensitivity and specificity. The role of endomyocardial biopsy has been recently redefined but remains unclear for most patients. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is an emerging technique that holds promise to diagnose patients with suspected myocarditis noninvasively. However, currently CMR is not able to assess the severity of inflammation, nor to definitely detect the underlying pathogen. Hence, whether it is necessary to obtain detailed histopathological information using biopsies in addition to a preceding CMR study has to be decided in consideration of the individual circumstances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Kuhl U, Pauschinger M, Noutsias M, et al.: High prevalence of viral genomes and multiple viral infections in the myocardium of adults with “idiopathic” left ventricular dysfunction. Circulation 2005, 111:887–893.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mahrholdt H, Wagner A, Deluigi CC, et al.: Presentation, patterns of myocardial damage, and clinical course of viral myocarditis. Circulation 2006, 114:1581–1590.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Drory Y, Turetz Y, Hiss Y, et al.: Sudden unexpected death in persons less than 40 years of age. Am J Cardiol 1991, 68:1388–1392.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Felker GM, Thompson RE, Hare JM, et al.: Underlying causes and long-term survival in patients with initially unexplained cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med 2000, 342:1077–1084.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mason JW, O’Connell JB, Herskowitz A, et al.: A clinical trial of immunosuppressive therapy for myocarditis. The Myocarditis Treatment Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med 1995, 333:269–275.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Theleman KP, Kuiper JJ, Roberts WC: Acute myocarditis (predominately lymphocytic) causing sudden death without heart failure. Am J Cardiol 2001, 88:1078–1083.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hufnagel G, Pankuweit S, Richter A, et al.: The European Study of Epidemiology and Treatment of Cardiac Inflammatory Diseases (ESETCID). First epidemiological results. Herz 2000, 25:279–285.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. McCully RB, Cooper LT, Schreiter S: Coronary artery spasm in lymphocytic myocarditis: a rare cause of acute myocardial infarction. Heart 2005, 91:202.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yilmaz A, Mahrholdt H, Athanasiadis A, et al.: Coronary vasospasm as the underlying cause for chest pain in patients with PVB19 myocarditis. Heart 2008, 94:1456–1463.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Smith SC, Ladenson JH, Mason JW, Jaffe AS: Elevations of cardiac troponin I associated with myocarditis. Experimental and clinical correlates. Circulation 1997, 95:163–168.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lauer B, Niederau C, Kuhl U, et al.: Cardiac troponin T in patients with clinically suspected myocarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997, 30:1354–1359.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nishii M, Inomata T, Takehana H, et al.: Serum levels of interleukin-10 on admission as a prognostic predictor of human fulminant myocarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004, 44:1292–1297.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sheppard R, Bedi M, Kubota T, et al.: Myocardial expression of fas and recovery of left ventricular function in patients with recent-onset cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005, 46:1036–1042.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Morgera T, Di Lenarda A, Dreas L, et al.: Electrocardiography of myocarditis revisited: clinical and prognostic significance of electrocardiographic changes. Am Heart J 1992, 124:455–467.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nakashima H, Katayama T, Ishizaki M, et al.: Q wave and non-Q wave myocarditis with special reference to clinical significance. Jpn Heart J 1998, 39:763–774.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Angelini A, Calzolari V, Calabrese F, et al.: Myocarditis mimicking acute myocardial infarction: role of endomyocardial biopsy in the differential diagnosis. Heart 2000, 84:245–250.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mendes LA, Picard MH, Dec GW, et al.: Ventricular remodeling in active myocarditis. Myocarditis Treatment Trial. Am Heart J 1999, 138:303–308.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hauck AJ, Kearney DL, Edwards WD: Evaluation of postmortem endomyocardial biopsy specimens from 38 patients with lymphocytic myocarditis: implications for role of sampling error. Mayo Clin Proc 1989, 64:1235–1245.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wu LA, Lapeyre AC 3rd, Cooper LT: Current role of endomyocardial biopsy in the management of dilated cardiomyopathy and myocarditis. Mayo Clin Proc 2001, 76:1030–1038.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Baughman KL: Diagnosis of myocarditis: death of Dallas criteria. Circulation 2006, 113:593–595.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cooper LT, Baughman KL, Feldman AM, et al.: The role of endomyocardial biopsy in the management of cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association, the American College of Cardiology, and the European Society of Cardiology. Circulation 2007, 116:2216–2233.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Deckers JW, Hare JM, Baughman KL: Complications of transvenous right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy in adult patients with cardiomyopathy: a seven-year survey of 546 consecutive diagnostic procedures in a tertiary referral center. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992, 19:43–47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pophal SG, Sigfusson G, Booth KL, et al.: Complications of endomyocardial biopsy in children. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999, 34:2105–2110.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Holzmann M, Nicko A, Kuhl U, et al.: Complication rate of right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy via the femoral approach: a retrospective and prospective study analyzing 3048 diagnostic procedures over an 11-year period. Circulation 2008, 118:1722–1728.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Karatolios K, Pankuweit S, Maisch B: Diagnosis and treatment of myocarditis: the role of endomyocardial biopsy. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 2007, 9:473–481.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Friedrich MG, Strohm O, Schulz-Menger J, et al.: Contrast media-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging visualizes myocardial changes in the course of viral myocarditis. Circulation 1998, 97:1802–1809.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Simonetti OP, Kim RJ, Fieno DS, et al.: An improved MR imaging technique for the visualization of myocardial infarction. Radiology 2001, 218:215–223.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wagner A, Mahrholdt H, Holly TA, et al.: Contrast-enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: an imaging study. Lancet 2003, 361:374–379.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mahrholdt H, Wagner A, Parker M, et al.: Relationship of contractile function to transmural extent of infarction in patients with chronic coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003, 42:505–512.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fieno DS, Hillenbrand HB, Rehwald WG, et al.: Infarct resorption, compensatory hypertrophy, and differing patterns of ventricular remodeling following myocardial infarctions of varying size. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004, 43:2124–2131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB, et al.: Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. Circulation 1999, 100:1992–2002.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Mahrholdt H, Goedecke C, Wagner A, et al.: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of human myocarditis: a comparison to histology and molecular pathology. Circulation 2004, 109:1250–1258. The article describes CMR findings seen in myocarditis in comparison to biopsy.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mahrholdt H, Wagner A, Judd RM, Sechtem U: Assessment of myocardial viability by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J 2002, 23:602–619.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Choudhury L, Mahrholdt H, Wagner A, et al.: Myocardial scarring in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002, 40:2156–2164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Vogelsberg H, Mahrholdt H, Deluigi CC, et al.: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in clinically suspected cardiac amyloidosis: noninvasive imaging compared to endomyocardial biopsy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008, 51:1022–1030.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Patel MR, Cawley PJ, Heitner JF, et al.: Detection of myocardial damage in patients with sarcoidosis. Circulation 2009, 120:1969–1977.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zagrosek A, Abdel-Aty H, Boye P, et al.: Cardiac magnetic resonance monitors reversible and irreversible myocardial injury in myocarditis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009, 2:131–138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Friedrich MG, Sechtem U, Schulz-Menger J, et al.: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in myocarditis: A JACC White Paper. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009, 53:1475–1487.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Mahrholdt H, Sechtem U: Noninvasive differentiation between active and healed myocarditis by cardiac magnetic resonance: are we there yet? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009, 2:139–142. This article states recommendations on indications for CMR in patients with suspected myocarditis, including CMR protocol, terminology for reporting CMR findings, and diagnostic CMR criteria for myocarditis.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Baccouche H, Mahrholdt H, Meinhardt G, et al.: Diagnostic synergy of non-invasive cardiovascular magnetic resonance and invasive endomyocardial biopsy in troponin-positive patients without coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2009, 30:2869–2879.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. De Cobelli F, Pieroni M, Esposito A, et al.: Delayed gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with chronic myocarditis presenting with heart failure or recurrent arrhythmias. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 47:1649–1654.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kindermann I, Kindermann M, Kandolf R, et al.: Predictors of outcome in patients with suspected myocarditis. Circulation 2008, 118:639–648.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anja Wagner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wagner, A., Bruder, O. & Mahrholdt, H. Myocarditis: Update and Critical Assessment. curr cardiovasc imaging rep 3, 57–64 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12410-010-9015-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12410-010-9015-y

Keywords

Navigation