Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Noninvasive screening for coronary atherosclerosis and silent ischemia in asymptomatic high-risk populations

  • Published:
Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Asymptomatic subjects at risk for adverse cardiovascular events, based on clinical risk models, are further risk-stratified by noninvasive imaging of coronary atherosclerosis and silent ischemia. Coronary atherosclerosis can be detected by imaging coronary artery calcification (CAC). CAC scores more than 400 are associated with a higher cardiac event rate. Silent ischemia can be detected by stress perfusion imaging employing single photon emission CT or positron emission tomography. Asymptomatic type 2 diabetics and those with advanced kidney disease represent high-risk populations. Asymptomatic diabetics with high CAC scores have a higher prevalence and extent of silent ischemia than those with low scores. The greater the extent of CAC, the worse the outcome. For asymptomatic chronic kidney disease patients, the larger the extent of stress perfusion abnormalities, the higher the cardiac mortality rate. New molecular imaging approaches for assessing myocardial metabolism and detecting vulnerable coronary plaques hold promise for risk stratification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Estimating coronary heart disease (CHD) risk using Framingham Heart Study prediction score sheets. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Available at: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/about/framingham/riskabs.htm.

  2. Greenland P, LaBree L, Azen SP, et al.: Coronary artery calcium score combined with Framingham score for risk prediction in asymptomatic individuals. JAMA 2004, 291:210–215. Erratum appears in JAMA 2004, 291:563.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Budoff MJ, Shaw LJ, Liu ST, et al.: Long-term prognosis associated with coronary calcification: observations from a registry of 25,253 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007, 49:1860–1870.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Detrano R, Guerci AD, Carr JJ, et al.: Coronary calcium as a predictor of coronary events in four racial or ethnic groups. N Engl J Med 2008, 358:1336–1345.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD, et al.: Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008, 52:2135–2144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Maron DJ, et al.; COURAGE Investigators: Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy. Circulation 2008, 117:1283–1291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schuijf JD, Poldermans D, Shaw LJ, et al.: Diagnostic and prognostic value of non-invasive imaging in known or suspected coronary artery disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006, 33:93–104.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Shaw LJ, Iskandrian AE: Prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 2004, 11:171–185.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Navare SM, Mather JF, Shaw LJ, et al.: Comparison of risk stratification with pharmacologic and exercise stress myocardial perfusion imaging: a meta-analysis. J Nucl Cardiol 2004, 11:551–561.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hachamovitch R, Hayes SW, Friedman JD, et al.: Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation 2003, 107:2900–2907.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zellweger MJ, Hachamovitch R, Kang X, et al.: Threshold, incidence, and predictors of prognostically high-risk silent ischemia in asymptomatic patients without prior diagnosis of coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol 2009, 16:193–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shaw LJ, Hendel RC, Heller GV, et al.: Prognostic estimation of coronary artery disease risk with resting perfusion abnormalities and stress ischemia on myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 2008, 15:762–773.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lima RS, Watson DD, Goode AR, et al.: Incremental value of combined perfusion and function over perfusion alone by gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of severe three-vessel coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003, 42:64–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Berman DS, Kang X, Slomka PJ, et al.: Underestimation of extent of ischemia by gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with left main coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol 2007, 14:521–528.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sharir T, Ben-Haim S, Mirzon K, et al.: High-speed myocardial perfusion imaging: initial clinical comparison with conventional dual-detector Anger camera imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2008, 1:156–163.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Slomka PJ, Patton JA, Berman DS, Germano G: Advances in technical aspects of myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2009, 16:255–276.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bateman TM, Heller GV, McGhie AI, et al.: Diagnostic accuracy of rest/stress ECG-gated Rb-82 myocardial perfusion PET: comparison with ECG-gated Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 2006, 13:24–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Parkash R, deKemp RA, Ruddy TD, et al.: Potential utility of rubidium 82 PET quantification in patients with 3-vessel coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol 2004, 11:440–449.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Di Carli MF, Hachamovitch R: New technology for noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery disease. Circulation 2007, 115:1464–1480.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Alexanderson E, Slomka P, Cheng V, et al.: Fusion of positron emission tomography and coronary computed tomographic angiography identifies fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the left main coronary artery soft plaque. J Nucl Cardiol 2008, 15:841–843.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bonow RO, Bohannon N, Hazzard W: Risk stratification in coronary artery disease and special populations. Am J Med 1996, 101:4A17S–4A22S; discussion 4A22S–4A24S.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Anand DV, Lim E, Hopkins D, et al.: Risk stratification in uncomplicated type 2 diabetes: prospective evaluation of the combined use of coronary artery calcium imaging and selective myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Eur Heart J 2006, 27:713–721.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Scholte AJ, Schuijf JD, Kharagjitsingh AV, et al.: Different manifestations of coronary artery disease by stress SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging, coronary calcium scoring, and multislice CT coronary angiography in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Nucl Cardiol 2008, 15:503–509.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Raggi P, Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Callister TQ: Prognostic value of coronary artery calcium screening in subjects with and without diabetes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004, 43:1663–1669.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Elkeles RS, Godsland IF, Feher MD, et al.; PREDICT Study Group: Coronary calcium measurement improves prediction of cardiovascular events in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes: the PREDICT study. Eur Heart J 2008, 29:2244–2251.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wackers FJ, Young LH, Inzucchi SE, et al.; Detection of Ischemia in Asymptomatic Diabetics Investigators: Detection of silent myocardial ischemia in asymptomatic diabetic subjects: the DIAD study. Diabetes Care 2004, 27:1954–1961. Erratum appears in Diabetes Care 2005, 28:504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Miller TD, Rajagopalan N, Hodge DO, et al.: Yield of stress single-photon emission computed tomography in asymptomatic patients with diabetes. Am Heart J 2004, 147:890–896.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rajagopalan N, Miller TD, Hodge DO, et al.: Identifying high-risk asymptomatic diabetic patients who are candidates for screening stress single-photon emission computed tomography imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005, 45:43–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zellweger MJ, Hachamovitch R, Kang X, et al.: Prognostic relevance of symptoms versus objective evidence of coronary artery disease in diabetic patients. Eur Heart J 2004, 25:543–550.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sozzi FB, Elhendy A, Rizzello V, et al.: Prognostic significance of myocardial ischemia during dobutamine stress echocardiography in asymptomatic patients with diabetes mellitus and no prior history of coronary events. Am J Cardiol 2007, 99:1193–1195.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wong ND, Rozanski A, Gransar H, et al.: Metabolic syndrome and diabetes are associated with an increased likelihood of inducible myocardial ischemia among patients with subclinical atherosclerosis. Diabetes Care 2005, 28:1445–1450.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Beller GA: Noninvasive screening for coronary atherosclerosis and silent ischemia in asymptomatic type 2 diabetic patients: is it appropriate and cost-effective? J Am Coll Cardiol 2007, 49:1918–1923.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Diamond GA, Kaul S, Shah PK: Screen testing cardiovascular prevention in asymptomatic diabetic patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007, 49:1915–1917.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wackers FJ, Young LH, Chyun DA, et al.: Screening for ischemia in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes: 5-year outcomes in the DIAD study [abstract]. Presented at the 68th Annual Scientific Sessions, American Diabetes Association. San Francisco, CA; June 6–10, 2008.

  35. Gibbons RJ: Asymptomatic patients with diabetes mellitus should not be screened for coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol 2006, 13:616–620.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Yerramasu A, Maggae SV, Lahiri A, Anand DV: Cardiac computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging for risk stratification in asymptomatic diabetic patients: a critical review. J Nucl Cardiol 2008, 15:13–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bax JJ, Bonow RO, Tschöpe D, et al.; Global Dialogue Group for the Evaluation of Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With Diabetes: The potential of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for risk stratification of asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 48:754–760.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sorajja P, Chareonthaitawee P, Rajagopalan N, et al.: Improved survival in asymptomatic diabetic patients with high-risk SPECT imaging treated with coronary artery bypass grafting. Circulation 2005, 112(Suppl):I311–I316.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Young LH, Wackers FJ, Chyun DA, et al.: Cardiac outcomes after screening for asymptomatic coronary artery disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: the DIAD study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2009, 301:1547–1555.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Schiffrin EL, Lipman ML, Mann JF: Chronic kidney disease: effects on the cardiovascular system. Circulation 2007, 116:85–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. McCullough PA, Li S, Jurkovitz CT, et al.; KEEP Investigators: Chronic kidney disease, prevalence of premature cardiovascular disease, and relationship to short-term mortality. Am Heart J 2008, 156:277–283.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Schrier RW: Role of diminished renal function in cardiovascular mortality: marker or pathogenetic factor? J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 47:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Shlipak MG, Fried LF, Cushman M, et al.: Cardiovascular mortality risk in chronic kidney disease: comparison of traditional and novel risk factors. JAMA 2005, 293:1737–1745.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Patel AD, Abo-Auda WS, Davis JM, et al.: Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging in predicting outcome after renal transplantation. Am J Cardiol 2003, 92:146–151.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hakeem A, Bhatti S, Dillie KS, et al.: Predictive value of myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography and the impact of renal function on cardiac death. Circulation 2008, 118:2540–2549.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Venkataraman R, Hage FG, Dorfman T, et al.: Role of myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol 2008, 102:1451–1456.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Dilsizian V, Bateman TM, Bergmann SR, et al.: Metabolic imaging with beta-methyl-p-[(123)I]-iodophenyl-pentadecanoic acid identifies ischemic memory after demand ischemia. Circulation 2005, 112:2169–2174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Nishimura M, Tsukamoto K, Hasebe N, et al.: Prediction of cardiac death in hemodialysis patients by myocardial fatty acid imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008, 51:139–145.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Guidelines on evaluation and management of cardiovascular disease. Am J Kidney Dis 2005, 45:S18–S26.

  50. McFalls EO, Ward HB, Moritz TE, et al.: Coronary-artery revascularization before elective major vascular surgery. N Engl J Med 2004, 351:2795–2804.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Poldermans D, Hoeks SE, Feringa HH: Pre-operative risk assessment and risk reduction before surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008, 51:1913–1924.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George A. Beller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beller, G.A. Noninvasive screening for coronary atherosclerosis and silent ischemia in asymptomatic high-risk populations. curr cardiovasc imaging rep 2, 213–222 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12410-009-0026-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12410-009-0026-5

Keywords

Navigation