Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Radiation exposure and dose reduction measures in cardiac CT

  • Published:
Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Noninvasive visualization of the heart by CT is highly accurate and useful, but its association with ionizing radiation and the potential risk of cancer induction has raised concerns. Dose-saving algorithms, new CT scanners, and scanning techniques have been developed to effectively reduce the amount of radiation exposure without deterioration of image quality. Furthermore, additional strategies for dose reduction can be pursued in daily practice following the ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) principle. However, there still is a high additional dose-saving potential in a consequent application of dose reduction measures, and we recommend individually adapted scan protocols to obtain cardiac CT studies with optimal diagnostic image quality and lowest possible radiation dose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. European Commission: European Guidelines on Quality Criteria for Computed Tomography. EUR 16262EN. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publication of the European Communities; 2000. Available at: http://www.drs.dk/guidelines/ct/quality/htmlindex.htm. Accessed July 2008.

  2. Bongartz G, Golding SJ, Jurik AG: 2004 CT Quality Criteria. European Commission. Available at: http://www. msct.info/CT_Quality_Criteria.htm. Accessed July 2008.

  3. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M, et al.: Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimates. Circulation 2006, 113:1305–1310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F, et al.: Quantification of obstructive and non-obstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005, 46:147–154.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA, et al.: High resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 2005, 112:2318–2323.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McCollough CH, Primak AN, Saba O, et al.: Dose performance of a 64-channel dual-source CT scanner. Radiology 2007, 243:775–784.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mori S, Nishizawa K, Kondo C, et al.: Effective doses in subjects undergoing computed tomography cardiac imaging with the 256-multislice CT scanner. Eur J Radiol 2008, 65:442–448.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Schertler T, et al.: Radiation dose estimates in dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography. Eur Radiol 2008, 18:592–599.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F, et al.: International prospective multi-centre study on radiation dose estimates of cardiac CT angiography in daily practice: results from the PROTECTION I study. Presented at the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Annual Scientific Meeting. Orlando, FL; July 17–20, 2008.

  10. Hermann F, Martinoff S, Meyer T, et al.: Reduction of radiation dose estimates in cardiac 64-slice CT angiography in patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Invest Radiol 2008, 43:253–260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jakobs TF, Becker CR, Ohnesorge B, et al.: Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation. Eur Radiol 2002, 12:1081–1086.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hausleiter J, Hermann F, Meyer T, et al.: A new algorithm for ECG-based tube current modulation (“MinDose”) reduces radiation dose estimates in cardiac dual source CT angiography. Presented at the American Heart Association’s Annual Scientific Meeting. Orlando, FL; November 4–7, 2007.

  13. Raupach R, Bruder H, Primak AN, et al.: Dose reduction strategies for CT cardiac imaging. Presented at the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Annual Scientific Meeting. Orlando, FL; July 17–20, 2008.

  14. Pflederer T, Bachmann S, Marwan M, et al.: Radiation exposure and image quality in staged low-dose protocols for coronary CT angiography: a randomized comparison. Presented at the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Annual Scientific Meeting. Orlando, FL; July 17–20, 2008.

  15. DeFrance T, Gebow D, Ramirez A, et al.: Initial experience with low-dose helical cardiac acquisitions: dose and image quality. Presented at the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Annual Scientific Meeting. Orlando, FL; July 17–20, 2008.

  16. Suess C, Chen X: Dose optimization in pediatric CT: current technology and future innovations. Pediatr Radiol 2002, 32:729–734; discussion 51–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Schmid FT, et al.: Low kilovoltage cardiac dual-source CT: attenuation, noise, and radiation dose. Eur Radiol 2008, 18:1809–1817.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Earls JP, Berman EL, Urban BA, et al.: Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose. Radiology 2008, 246:742–753.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Husmann L, Valenta I, Gaemperli O, et al.: Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. Eur Heart J 2008, 29:191–197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hirai N, Horiguchi J, Fujioka C, et al.: Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality, stenosis, and radiation dose. Radiology 2008, 248:424–430.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shuman WP, Branch KR, May JM, et al.: Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose. Radiology 2008, 248:431–437.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Leschka S, et al.: Low-dose CT coronary angiography in the step-and-shoot mode: diagnostic performance. Heart 2008, 94:1132–1137.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dewey M, Zimmermann E, Laule M, et al.: Three-vessel coronary artery disease examined with 320-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. Eur Heart J 2008, 29:1669.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hoe J: First experience with 320 MSCT coronary angiography using volume prospective ECG gating to reduce radiation dose. Presented at the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Annual Meeting. Orlando, FL; July 17–20, 2008.

  25. Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM, et al.: ACCF/ACR/ SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006, 48:1475–1497.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bluemke DA, Achenbach S, Budoff M, et al.: Noninvasive coronary artery imaging; magnetic resonance angiography and multidetector computed tomography angiography: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease in the Young. Circulation 2008, 118:586–606.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gopal A, Budoff MJ: A new method to reduce radiation exposure during multi-row detector cardiac computed tomographic angiography. Int J Cardiol 2007 Dec 6 (Epub ahead of print).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Lazarettstr. 36, 80636, München, Germany

    Jörg Hausleiter

Authors
  1. Tanja Meyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Franziska Hein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stefan Martinoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Albert Schömig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jörg Hausleiter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jörg Hausleiter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meyer, T., Hein, F., Martinoff, S. et al. Radiation exposure and dose reduction measures in cardiac CT. curr cardiovasc imaging rep 1, 133–140 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12410-008-0020-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12410-008-0020-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation