Skip to main content
Log in

Drinking Water Treatments for Arsenic and Manganese Removal and Health Risk Assessment in White Rock, Canada

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Exposure and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The City of White Rock, Canada has been facing challenges of elevated concentrations of arsenic and manganese in its drinking water supply. A pilot water treatment study was conducted to explore effective contaminant removal solutions for human health risk mitigation. The arsenic and manganese removal performance of four treatment processes, including ozonation-manganese greensand filtration (OSF), OSF-iron-based granular media adsorption (OSFIA), the Burgess Iron Removal Method (BIRM), and BIRM-iron-based granular media adsorption (BIA) were evaluated. The non-cancer health risks and the incremental lifetime cancer risks (ILCR) posed by arsenic in different water sources were also assessed. The results show that OSFIA treatment achieved the highest arsenic and manganese removal. An average arsenic removal rate of 68.5% (initial concentration = 9.3 μg/L) was observed using OSFIA during two months of treatment, while manganese (initial concentration = 133.9 μg/L) can be completely removed. The arsenic removal was mainly be attributed to the adsorption of iron-based granular media. The mean values of non-cancer health risks of arsenic exposure due to oral intake of treated water were identified to be lower than the critical threshold for different age groups. In addition, the probability of critical ILCR occurrence can be greatly reduced. Based on the results from the pilot study, OSFIA was selected to construct a full-scale water treatment plant. Arsenic and manganese concentrations in the effluent from the plant can be reduced to a low-to-undetectable level, achieving negligible health risks to the residents of the city.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AO:

Aesthetic objective

BIA:

Burgess iron removal method + iron-based granular media adsorption

BIRM:

Burgess iron removal method

HQ:

Hazard quotient

ILCR:

Incremental lifetime cancer risks

MAC:

Maximum acceptable concentration

OSF:

Ozonation + manganese greensand filtration

OSFIA:

Ozonation + manganese greensand filtration + iron-based granular media adsorption

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Strategic Partnership Grants for Projects (NSERC SPG-P) and RES’EAU-WaterNet for their support. The authors would also like to thank the water utility at the City of White Rock for the funding and technical support to this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rehan Sadiq.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 125 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, G., Mian, H.R., Dyck, R. et al. Drinking Water Treatments for Arsenic and Manganese Removal and Health Risk Assessment in White Rock, Canada. Expo Health 12, 793–807 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-019-00338-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-019-00338-4

Keywords

Navigation