Skip to main content
Log in

How to deal with a CAPEX-bias: fixed-OPEX-CAPEX-share (FOCS)

  • Forschung | Regulierung und Marktdesign
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1 /

© Adapted from Oxera (2019)

Notes

  1. To be accurate, we note that the ordinance has been changed recently. Section 23 still exists formally, but is no longer activated, as it has been replaced by another section arranging an annual CAPEX-true-up.

  2. In the end, the AEMC decided not to proceed to a regulatory reform for the time being due to other reform priorities.

  3. This expression could be slightly refined. Under FOCS, OPEX and CAPEX go into TOTEX; afterwards these are changed into operating costs and capital costs. For capital, expenditure and costs are not the same. We ignore this refinement

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

von Bebenburg, C., Brunekreeft, G. & Burger, A. How to deal with a CAPEX-bias: fixed-OPEX-CAPEX-share (FOCS). Z Energiewirtsch 47, 54–63 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12398-023-0906-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12398-023-0906-4

Navigation