Skip to main content

Knowledge, Use and Effectiveness of Social Acceptance Measures for Wind Projects

Die Kenntnis, Nutzung und Wirksamkeit von Maßnahmen zur Steigerung der Akzeptanz von Windprojekten

Abstract

Wind energy is one of the key technologies to become independent of fossil fuels. Implementation of wind energy on a local level, however, has sometimes proved to be challenging and dealing with local acceptance of onshore wind turbines has become troublesome for some projects. Communication and public involvement are seen as strategies to prevent or respond to local opposition. This paper analyses the views of a variety of experts in wind energy on this matter. It focuses on eliciting their experiences with public participation measures. Furthermore, the perceived effectiveness of the measures for the social acceptance of wind energy projects is analysed. To do so, this paper draws on an expert survey among 207 individuals across Europe linked to wind energy projects. The analysis shows that negative reactions to wind farms are reported more frequently than positive reactions. In nearly 40% of cases, projects experience negative consequences on project development due to a lack of social acceptance, ranging from delays to changes in project plans and even termination. The vast majority of wind project developers respond to this by carrying out public participation activity at least sometimes. However, a much lower share does this systematically and the level of activity is low in early project phases. With regard to the relationship between project activities and project success, there is some support for the assumption that early and systematic involvement of the public and stakeholders is likely to reduce negative reactions.

Zusammenfassung

Windenergie stellt eine der zentralen Technologien dar, um unabhängig von fossilen Brennstoffen zu werden. Auf der lokalen Ebene stellt die Umsetzung jedoch teilweise eine Herausforderung dar und die lokale Akzeptanz von Onshore Windkraftanlagen ist zu einem zentralen Thema geworden. Kommunikation und Bürgerbeteiligung werden als Strategien gesehen, um lokaler Opposition vorzubeugen oder dieser zu begegnen. In diesem Beitrag werden die Sichtweise von unterschiedlichen Experten aus dem Bereich Windenergie sowie ihre Erfahrungen mit Maßnahmen der Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung untersucht. Zudem wird die Wirksamkeit der Maßnahmen in Bezug auf die soziale Akzeptanz von Windenergieprojekten analysiert. Für die Analyse wird auf eine Expertenbefragung von 207 Personen im Zusammenhang mit Windenergieprojekten zurückgegriffen. Die Untersuchung zeigt, dass häufiger negative als positive Reaktionen auf Windfarmen berichtet werden. In fast 40 % der Fälle hat ein Mangel an sozialer Akzeptanz negative Folgen für die Projektentwicklung, welche von zeitlichen Verzögerungen bis zum Stopp des Projekts reichen. Die große Mehrheit der Projektentwickler reagiert darauf, indem zumindest ab und zu Aktivitäten zur Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung durchgeführt werden. Ein viel kleinerer Anteil tut dies jedoch systematisch und in frühen Projektphasen ist nur ein geringes Aktivitätslevel zu verzeichnen. In Bezug auf einen Zusammenhang zwischen den Aktivitäten und dem Erfolg des Projekts geben die Analysen Hinweise darauf, dass frühes und systematisches Beteiligen der Öffentlichkeit und Interessensgruppen negative Reaktionen reduzieren kann.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Notes

  1. She differentiates between different forms of public participation: non-participation (manipulation and therapy), tokenism (informing, consultation and placation) and citizen power (partnership, delegated power and citizen control). Engagement (manipulation, informing or consulting) with the public is at the lowest level and citizen control (delegated power) is on top level (Arnstein 1969).

  2. Single-sample t‑test.

  3. The positive and negative issues were derived from a review of best practices, guidelines and toolkits on social acceptance in the wind energy sector. This review was part of the WISE Power project and its results are described in Deliverable 2.1 (Dütschke and Wesche 2014).

  4. There is quite a high number of missing values in these questions; the remaining sample is 41–51 respondents.

  5. Again there is quite a high number of missing values in these questions; the remaining sample is 41–50 respondents.

References

  • Arnstein SR (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst Plann 35(4):216–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AWEA – American Wind Energy Association (2017) Small & Community Wind. http://www.awea.org/small-and-community-wind. Accessed: 27. Aug 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • Devine-Wright P, Howes Y (2010) Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: A wind energy case study. J Environ Psychol 30:271–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dütschke E, Wesche JP (2014) Wind-Acceptance: a user guide for developers and municipalities review of best practices, guidelines and toolkits on social acceptance in the wind energy sector, compiled within the WISE Power project, funded under the intelligent Europe program. www.wisepower-project.eu. Accessed: 27. Aug 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis G, Ferraro G (2016) The social acceptance of wind energy. Where we stand and the path ahead. JRC Science for policy report. European Commission, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2011a) Energy Roadmap 2050, available on the European Commission’s website. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52011DC0885&from=EN. Accessed: 27. Aug 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2011b) Special Eurobarometer 364 – Public Awareness and Acceptance of CO2-capture and storage. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_364_en.pdf. Accessed: 27. Aug 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier M, Simard L, Waaub JP (2011) Public participation in strategic environmental assessment (SEA): Critical review and the Quebec (Canada) approach. Environ Impact Assess Rev 31:48–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haggett C (2011) Understanding public responses to offshore windpowe. Energy Policy 39:503–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horbaty R, Huber S, Ellis G (2012) Large-scale wind deployment, social acceptance. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Energy Environ 1:194–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jami AA, Walsh PR (2017) From consultation to collaboration: A participatory framework for positive community engagement with wind energy projects in Ontario, Canada. Energy Res Soc Sci 27:14–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klæboe R, Sundfør H (2016) Windmill noise annoyance, visual aesthetics, and attitudes towards renewable energy sources. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13:746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur J (2016) Challenging public engagement: participation, deliberation and power in renewable energy policy. J Environ Stud Sci 6:631–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrova MA (2016) From NIMBY to acceptance: Toward a novel framework VESPA For organizing and interpreting community concerns. Renew Energy 86:1280–1294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed MS (2008) Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological conservation 141:2417–2431

  • Schumann D, Fischer W, Hake J‑F (2012) Akzeptanz der Transformation des Energiesystems in der Bevölkerung. Energiewirtsch Tagesfr 62(6):29–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer P‑J, Bovet J (2016) The potential of public participation to facilitate infrastructure decision-making: Lessons from the German and European legal planning system for electricity grid expansion. Util Policy 42:64–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheate WR, Rosário M (2010) Strategic approaches and assessment techniques – Potential for knowledge brokerage towards sustainability. Environ Impact Assess Rev 30:278–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wesche J, Dütschke E, Schneider U (2015) People vs. Wind farms? – To what extent are strategies for public participation used to foster social acceptance in the European wind energy sector? In: EWEA 2015 Paris. Europe’s Premier Wind Energy Event. Scientific Proceedings, 99–103

  • Wind Barriers (2010) Administrative and grid access barriers to wind power. http://windbarriers.eu. Accessed: 27. Aug 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • Wüstenhagen R, Wolsink M, Bürer J (2007) Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: an introduction to the concept. Energy Policy 35(5):2683–2691

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union’s Intelligent Energy – Europe Programme (WISE Power Project) (IEE/13/528/SI2.674872).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisabeth Dütschke.

Caption Electronic Supplementary Material

Appendix: Questionnaire

Appendix: Questionnaire

Table 2 Correlations between various negative reactions to wind farms
Table 3 Correlations between various positive reactions to wind farms

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dütschke, E., Schneider, U. & Wesche, J. Knowledge, Use and Effectiveness of Social Acceptance Measures for Wind Projects. Z Energiewirtsch 41, 299–310 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12398-017-0211-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12398-017-0211-1

Keywords

  • Wind Projects
  • Social Acceptance
  • Publication Participation
  • Wind Farm
  • Wind Energy