Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft

, Volume 36, Issue 2, pp 101–111 | Cite as

Quantifying the CO2 Permit Price Sensitivity

  • Georg Grüll
  • Rüdiger KieselEmail author


Equilibrium models have been widely used in the literature with the aim of showing theoretical properties of emissions trading schemes. This paper applies equilibrium models to empirically study permit prices and to quantify the permit price sensitivity. In particular, we demonstrate that emission trading schemes both with and without banking are inherently prone to price jumps.


CO2 emission allowances Equilibrium model Price sensitivity Banking value 

Quantifizierung der CO2-Zertifikate-Preis Sensitivität


Zur Untersuchung der theoretischen Eigenschaften von Emissionshandelssystemen wurden in der Literatur meist Gleichgewichtsmodelle genutzt. In diesem Artikel nutzen wir Gleichgewichtsmodelle zur empirischen Untersuchung von Zertifikatepreisen und ihren Sensitivitäten. Wir zeigen insbesondere, daß Emissionshandelssysteme (auch wenn Banking zugelassen ist) Preisprozesse generieren, die Sprünge enthalten.


  1. Carmona R, Fehr M, Hinz J, Porchet A (2009) Market design for emission trading schemes. SIAM Rev 9(3):465–469 MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. Chesney M, Taschini L (2008) The endogenous price dynamics of emission allowances and an application to CO2 option pricing. Preprint Google Scholar
  3. Cronshaw M, Kruse J (1996) Regulated firms in pollution permit markets with banking. J Regul Econ 9(2):179–189 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. European Union (2006) EU emissions trading scheme delivers first verified emissions data for installations. Press release IP/06/612. Brussels Google Scholar
  5. Grüll G (2010) Modelling CO2 permit prices. Universität Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsbibliothek Google Scholar
  6. Grüll G, Taschini L (2011) Cap-and-trade properties under different hybrid scheme designs. J Environ Econ Manag 61(1):107–118 zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hepburn C (2009) In: Helm D, Hepburn C (eds) Carbon taxes, emissions trading, and hybrid schemes. The economics and politics of climate change. Oxford University Press, London, pp 365–384 Google Scholar
  8. Hitzemann S, Uhrig-Homburg M (2010) Understanding the price dynamics of emission permits: a model for multiple trading periods. Preprint Google Scholar
  9. Jacoby HD, Ellerman AD (2004) The safety valve and climate policy. Energy Policy 32(4):481–491 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jeanblanc M, Yor M, Chesney M (2009) Mathematical methods for financial markets. Springer, Berlin zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kling C, Rubin J (1997) Bankable permits for the control of environmental pollution. J Public Econ Theory 64:101–115 Google Scholar
  12. Milevsky MA, Posner SE (1998) Asian options, the sum of lognormals, and the reciprocal gamma distribution. J Financ Quant Anal 33(3):409–421 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Murray BC, et al. (2009) Balancing cost and emissions certainty: an allowance reserve for cap-and-trade. Rev Environ Econ Policy 1(3):84–103 Google Scholar
  14. Roberts MJ, Spence M (1976) Effluent charges and licenses under uncertainty. J Public Econ 3(5):193–208 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rubin J (1996) A model of intertemporal emission trading, banking and borrowing. J Environ Econ Manag 31:269–286 zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Seifert J, Uhrig-Homburg M, Wagner M (2008) Dynamic behavior of CO2 spot prices—theory and empirical evidence. J Environ Econ Manag 56(2):180–194 zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Vieweg+Teubner 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Energy Trading and Financial ServicesUniversity of Duisburg-EssenEssenGermany

Personalised recommendations