Advertisement

Contemporary Jewry

, Volume 35, Issue 3, pp 285–313 | Cite as

Deep Blue: Notes on the Jewish Snail Fight

  • Gadi SagivEmail author
Article

Abstract

The Bible requires Jews to tie a tekhelet (blue) cord as part of their tzitzit (fringes on traditional prayer shawl and everyday undergarment). Rabbinic sources of antiquity insisted that the tekhelet dye must have been produced from a marine mollusk termed hillazon. For various reasons, the custom of having this tekhelet cord, which is usually associated with the colors blue or violet, disappeared from Jewish material culture sometime in late antiquity. During the 1880s the Hasidic leader Gershon Hanoch Leiner of Radzin (Radzyń Podlaski, Poland) announced that he had found the ancient hillazon and succeeded in producing tekhelet, which he distributed to his followers. However, his tekhelet did not gain popularity. A much wider interest in tekhelet began in the 1980s, when a new tekhelet was introduced by religious Zionist Jews, resulting in an abundance of Orthodox publications on the subject. However, the 1980s renaissance of tekhelet raised objections from various Jewish Orthodox circles. This paper aims to sketch a preliminary map of the tekhelet debate that took place after the introduction of the second tekhelet in the 1980s. It opens with a brief history of tekhelet, followed by a description of the dominant narrative of contemporary tekhelet, and its main opponents. The rest of the article presents central focal points of the controversy: debates regarding the production of the dye; issues of authority regarding acceptance of the new tekhelet; and a messianic tension revealed by the discussion of tekhelet. By providing a non-Orthodox account of the tekhelet debate, this article sheds light on contemporary tekhelet discourse yet also exposes fundamental issues in contemporary Orthodox Judaism, particularly with respect to the relationship between religion and science, and the tension between radicalism and conservatism.

Keywords

Tekhelet Colors and Dyes in Judaism Religion and science Orthodox Judaism Zionism Messianism 

References

  1. Adler, Menachem Mendel. 1999. Kuntres tekhelet ve-argaman. Jerusalem: Hamosad Le’idud Limud Hatorah (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  2. Amar, Zohar. 2011. The color of tekhelet according to Maimonides. Hama’yan 52(2): 77–87 (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  3. Ariel, Israel. 1985. When will the temple be rebuilt? Tsfia: Anthology for the issues of our time 2: 49–58 (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  4. Ariel, Shmuel. 2005. Ma’amarim benose tekhelet. Otniel: Beit Vaad Har Hevron (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  5. Aviner, Shlomo Haim Hacohen. 1996. Igrot ktsarot. Iturei Kohanim 140: 15–18 (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  6. Ben-Yehuda, Nachman. 1995. The Masada myth: Collective memory and mythmaking in Israel. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  7. Ben-Yehuda, Nachman. 2002. Sacrificing truth: Archaeology and the myth of Masada. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.Google Scholar
  8. Ben-Yehuda, Nachman. 2007. Excavating Masada: The politics-archaeology connection at work. In Selective remembrances: Archaeology in the construction, commemoration, and consecration of national pasts, ed. Philip L. Kohl, Mara Kozelsky, and Nachman Ben-Yehuda, 247–276. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Brooke, John Hedley. 1991. Science and religion: Some historical perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Burstein, Menahem. 2000. Tekhelet. Jerusalem: Sifriati-Gitler (Hebrew, first edition: 1988).Google Scholar
  11. Eliashiv, Yosef Shalom. 1998. Tekhelet of tzitzit in our times. Halikhot sadeh 109: 9–10 (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  12. Drori, Tsfania 2003. Zerizim Makdimim Lilbosh Tekhelet Malkhut. Ma‘ayanei Hayeshu‘ah: Hatnu‘ah Letarbut Israel 85 (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  13. Elsner, Otto, and Ehud Spanier. 1987. The past, present and future of Tekhelet. In The royal purple and the biblical blue: Argaman and tekhelet: The study of Chief Rabbi Dr. Isaac Herzog on the dye industries in ancient Israel and recent scientific contributions, ed. Ehud Spanier, 167–177. Jerusalem: Keter Publishing House.Google Scholar
  14. Feige, Michael. 2007. Recovering authenticity: West-Bank settlers and the second stage of national archaeology. In Selective remembrances: Archaeology in the construction, commemoration, and consecration of national pasts, ed. Philip L. Kohl, Mara Kozelsky, and Nachman Ben-Yehuda, 277–298. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Finkelstein, Israel, and Neil Asher Silberman. 2001. The Bible unearthed: Archaeology’s new vision of ancient Israel and the origin of its sacred texts. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  16. Fischer, Shlomo. 2012. Fundamentalist or romantic nationalist? Israeli modern orthodoxy. In Dynamic belonging: Contemporary Jewish collective identities, ed. Harvey E. Goldberg, Steven M. Cohen, and Ezra Kopelowitz, 91–111. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  17. Herzog, Isaac. 1987. The royal purple and the biblical blue: Argaman and tekhelet: The study of Chief Rabbi Dr. Isaac Herzog on the dye industries in ancient Israel and recent scientific contributions, ed. Ehud Spanier. Jerusalem: Keter Publishing House.Google Scholar
  18. Inbari, Motti. 2009. Jewish fundamentalism and the Temple Mount: Who will build the third temple? (trans: Shaul Vardi). Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  19. Inbari, Motti. 2012. Messianic religious Zionism confronts Israeli territorial compromises. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kalisher, Tzvi Hirsch. 2002. In Drishat Tzion, ed. Yehuda Etzion. Jerusalem: Mossad Harav Kook (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  21. Kasher, Menachem Mendel. 1967. Torah shlema, vol. 25. Addendum to Parashat Truma. Jerusalem: Machon Torah Shlema (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  22. Kohl, Philip L., Mara Kozelsky, and Nachman Ben-Yehuda. 2007. Selective remembrances: Archaeology in the construction, commemoration, and consecration of national pasts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Koren, Zvi C. 2008. Archaeo-chemical analysis of royal purple on a Darius I stone jar. Microchimica Acta 162: 381–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Koren, Zvi C. 2013. New chemical insights into the ancient molluskan purple dyeing process. In Archaeological chemistry VIII, ACS symposium series 1147, ed. Ruth Ann and James H. Burton, chap. 3, 43–67. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.Google Scholar
  25. Koren, Zvi C. 2014. Zvi C. Koren’s reply to the Stermans’ response: Continuing the tekhelet debate. http://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/biblical-artifacts/artifacts-and-the-bible/zvi-c-korens-reply-to-the-stermans-response/ (Accessed 26 Oct 2014).
  26. Kraft, Dina. 2011. Memo from Ramat Gan: Rediscovered, ancient color is reclaiming Israeli interest. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/28/world/middleeast/28blue.html?emc=eta1 (Accessed 26 Oct 2014).
  27. Lamm, Norman. 1990. Torah Umadda: The encounter of religious learning and worldly knowledge in the Jewish tradition. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
  28. Leiner, Gershon Hanokh. 1887. Sefunei tmunei hol. Warsaw: Haim Kelter Publishing House (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  29. Leiner, Gershon Hanokh. 1891. Eyn hatekhelet. Warsaw: Meir Yehiel Halter Publishing House (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  30. Liebman, Charles S. 1988. Modern orthodoxy in Israel. Judaism 100: 405–410.Google Scholar
  31. Lipschitz, Israel. 1843. Mishnayot seder moed im peirush tiferet Israel, part Kupat rochlim. Danzig: Rathke & Schroth.Google Scholar
  32. Magid, Shaul. 1998. ‘A thread of blue’: Rabbi Gershon Henoch Leiner of Radzyń and his search for continuity in response to modernity. Polin 11: 31–52.Google Scholar
  33. Robinson, Ira. 2000. Judaism since 1700. In The history of science and religion in western tradition: An encyclopedia, ed. Gary B. Ferngren, 329–332. New York and London: Garland.Google Scholar
  34. Rosenberg, Shalom. 1988. Torah Umada Bahagut Hayehudit Hahadasha. Jerusalem: Ministry of Culture and Education (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  35. Ruderman, David B. 2000. Judaism to 1700. In The history of science and religion in western tradition: An encyclopedia, ed. Gary B. Ferngren, 270–276. New York and London: Garland.Google Scholar
  36. Schachter, Tzvi. 1999. Nefesh Harav. Jerusalem and New York: Flatbush Beth Hamedrosh (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  37. Singer, Mendel E. 2001. Understanding the criteria for the chilazon. Journal of Halacha and Contemporary Society 42: 5–29.Google Scholar
  38. Singer, Mendel E. 2002. A response to Sterman in the letters section. Journal of Halacha and Contemporary Society 44: 97–110.Google Scholar
  39. Soloveitchik, Yosef Dov Halevi. 2002. Shiurim Lezekher Aba Mari. Jerusalem: Mossad Harav Kook (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  40. Sterman, Baruch. 1996. The science of Tekhelet. In Tekhelet: The renaissance of a Mitzva, ed. Alfred S. Cohen, 63–78. New York: Yeshiva University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Sterman, Baruch. 2002. The source of techelet: A response to Dr. Singer. Journal of Halacha and Contemporary Society 43: 112–124.Google Scholar
  42. Sterman, Baruch, and Judy Taubes-Sterman. 2012. The rarest blue: The remarkable story of an ancient color lost to history and rediscovered. Guilford, CT: Lyons Press.Google Scholar
  43. Sterman, Baruch, and Judy Taubes-Sterman. 2013. Baruch and Judy Taubes Sterman respond. http://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/archaeology-today/biblical-archaeology-topics/baruch-and-judy-taubes-sterman-respond/ (Accessed 26 Oct 2014).
  44. Sukenik, Naama, David Iluz, Orit Shamir, Alexander Varvak, and Zohar Amar. 2013. Purple-dyed textiles from Wadi Murabba’at: Historical, archaeological and chemical aspects. Archaeological Textiles Review 55: 46–54.Google Scholar
  45. Temple Institute. 1996. Tsfia: Hikrey mikdash, 5 (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  46. Tukachinsky, Yechiel Michel. 1970. Ir hakodesh vehamikdash, part 5. Jerusalem: Salomon Printing House (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  47. Wilson, David B. 2000. The historiography of science and religion. In The history of science and religion in western tradition: An encyclopedia, ed. Gary B. Ferngren, 2–11. New York and London: Garland.Google Scholar
  48. Zerubavel, Yael. 1995. Recovered roots: Collective memory and the making of Israeli national tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  49. Ziderman, Israel. 1988. Lehidush mitsvat tekhelet batsitsit. Tehumin 9: 423–446 (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  50. Ziderman, I. Irving. 2008. The biblical dye tekhelet and its use in Jewish textiles. Dyes in History and Archaeology 21: 36–44.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Open University of IsraelRaananaIsrael

Personalised recommendations