Skip to main content
Log in

Retrieval of Microbial Inactivation Kinetic Parameters in Chemical Preservation and Disinfection by the Endpoints Method

  • Published:
Food Engineering Reviews Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The response of microorganisms to chemical preservatives and disinfectants can be described by the traditional Chick-Watson-Hom’s (CWH) model or more general Weibullian survival model, of which it is a special case. The chemical agent efficacy and its concentration dependence can be described by either a power-law or log-exponential term. For dynamic inactivation, the unstable or volatile agent’s dissipation can be described by a flexible two-parameter model, which is inserted as an algebraic term into the differential rate equation. In principle, both models can be used to estimate a targeted microbe’s survival parameters from the agent’s concentrations when constant or its initial and final concentrations only if not, and the corresponding final survival ratios reached. This Endpoints Method eliminates the need to determine the entire survival curves, and in the dynamic case the agent’s entire dissipation curves too. Static inactivation requires the numerical solution of simultaneous nonlinear algebraic equations, and dynamic, of simultaneous nonlinear equations whose right-hand side is the numerical solution of differential rate equations in which the agent’s dissipating pattern is incorporated as a term. When the Weibullian survival model’s shape factor is known a priori, the theoretical minimum of experimental final survival ratios needed is two and when unknown three. However, validation of the model and mathematical procedure must come from their ability to predict correctly final survival ratios not used in the parameter magnitudes calculation, which requires at least one additional experimental final survival ratio determination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Springthorpe S, Sander M, Nolan K, Sattar SA (2001) Comparison of static and dynamic disinfection models for bacteria and viruses in water of varying quality. Water Sci Technol 43:247–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Peleg M (2020) Endpoints Method for predicting microbial inactivation, nutrients degradation and quality loss at high and ultra high temperatures. Food Safety Eng. A. Demirci, H. Feng, and K. Krishnamurthy. (Editors). Springer. pp. 421–446

  3. Corradini MG, Normand MD, Newcomer C, Schaffner DW, Peleg M (2009) Extracting survival parameters from isothermal, isobaric and ‘iso-concentration’ inactivation experiments by the ‘three end points method.’ J Food Sci 74:R1–R11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gyurek LL, Finch GR (1998) Modeling water treatment chemical disinfection kinetics. J Environ Eng 14:783–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rossi R, Antonelli M, Mezzanotte V, Nurizzo C (2007) Peracetic acid disinfection: a feasible alternative to wastewater chlorination. Water Environ Res 79:341–350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chick H (1908) Investigation of the laws of disinfection. Epidiomiol Infect 8:92-158

  7. Haas CN, Joffe J (1994) Disinfection under dynamic conditions: modification of Hom’s model for decay. Environ Sci Technol 28:1367–1469

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. John DE, Haas CN, Nwachuku N, Gebra CP (2005) Chlorine and ozone disinfection of Encephalitozoon intestinalis spores. Water Res 39:2369–2375

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mounaouer B, Abdennaceur H (2016) Modeling and kinetic characterization of wastewater disinfection using chlorine and UV irradiation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:19861–19875

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Santoro DR. Gehr TA, Bartrand L., Liberti M, Notarnicola A, Dell’Erba D, Falsanisi, Haas CN (2007) Wastewater disinfection by peracetic acid: Assessment of models for tracking residual measurements and inactivation. Water Environ Res 79:775-787

  11. Van Boekel MAJS (2002) On the use of the Weibull model to describe thermal inactivation of microbial vegetative cells. Intnl J Food Microbiol 74:139–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Corradini MG, Peleg M (2003) A model of microbial survival curves in water treated with a volatile agent. J Appl Microbiol 95:1268–1276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Peleg M (2021a) Microbial dose-response curves and disinfection efficacy models revisited. Food Engng Rev 13:305–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Peleg M (2021b) Modeling the dynamic kinetics of microbial disinfection with dissipating chemical agents—a theoretical investigation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 105:539–549

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Peleg M, Penchina C (2000) Modeling microbial survival during exposure to a lethal agent with varying intensity. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 40:159–172

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Peleg M (2006) Advanced quantitative microbiology for foods and biosystems. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton Fl

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Peleg M, Normand MD, Corradini MG, van Asselt AJ, de Jong P, ter Steeg PF (2008) Estimating the heat resistance parameters of bacterial spores from their survival ratios at the end of UHT and other heat treatments. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 48:634–648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Clark RM (1998). Chlorine demand and TTHM formation kinetics: A second-order model. J Environ Eng 124:16-24

  19. Ragazzo PN, Chiucchini, Picolo V, Sapodini M, Carrer S, Zanon F, Gehr R (2020) Wastewater disinfection: long-term laboratory and full-scale studies on performic acid in comparison with peracetic acid and chlorine. Water Res 184: 116169

  20. Sahulka SQ, Bhattarai B, Bhattaxharajee A, Tanne W, Mahar RB, Goel R (2021) Differences in chlorine and paracetic acid disinfection kinetics of Enterococcus faecalis and Escherichia fergusoni and their susceptible strains based on gene expressions and genomics. Water Res 203: 117480

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author expresses his deep gratitude to Mark D. Normand who wrote the original programs to retrieve kinetic parameters from residual survival ratios in static and dynamic thermal and non-thermal microbial inactivation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Micha Peleg.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peleg, M. Retrieval of Microbial Inactivation Kinetic Parameters in Chemical Preservation and Disinfection by the Endpoints Method. Food Eng Rev 14, 617–628 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12393-022-09310-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12393-022-09310-6

Keywords

Navigation