Food Engineering Reviews

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 157–167 | Cite as

Wolfram Demonstrations: Free Interactive Software for Food Engineering Education and Practice

  • Mark D. Normand
  • Uri Lesmes
  • Maria G. Corradini
  • Micha Peleg
Article

Abstract

The Wolfram Demonstrations Project on the web offers a freely downloadable interactive program, ‘Mathematica Player’, which can be used to view and manipulate about six thousands Demonstrations to date. They have been contributed by professionals and amateurs from around the world and include many that elucidate scientific and engineering principles through graphical displays. Some can also be used to do actual engineering calculations, and of these, about forty have been developed specifically for food and food engineering applications. The Project’s Demonstrations are all esthetically attractive, give brief written explanations of the displays and provide short descriptions of the theory behind them. Each also gives typical or representative examples, which are shown with their corresponding parameter settings. Once a Demonstration is downloaded, the user can enter and modify the display parameters using sliders on the screen and watch the effect almost instantaneously. This makes the Demonstrations a powerful teaching and learning tool and an effective aid to professionals in routine engineering calculations. In this review, the food-related Demonstrations are briefly described and their potential role in Food Engineering education and practice is assessed.

Keywords

Unit operations Mass balance Heat transfer Particulates Flow Microbial growth Microbial inactivation Risk assessment Kinetics 

References

  1. 1.
    Corradini MG, Peleg M (2005) Estimating non-isothermal bacterial growth in foods from isothermal experimental data. J Appl Microbiol 99:187–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Corradini MG, Peleg M (2009) Direct calculation of the survival ratio and isothermal time equivalent in heat preservation processes. In: Simpson R (ed) Engineering aspects of thermal food processing. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Feng H, Morgan M, Balasubramaniam VM, Singh RP (2007) Virtual laboratory modules for food processing education. Institute of Food Technologists, 2007 Annual Meeting, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Peleg M (2003) Microbial survival curves: interpretation, mathematical modeling and utilization. Comments Theor Biol 8:357–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Peleg M (2006) Advanced quantitative microbiology for food and biosystems: models for predicting growth and inactivation. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Peleg M, Normand MD (1992) Estimation of the water activity of multicomponent dry mixtures. Trends Food Sci Tech 3:157–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Peleg M, Normand MD, Horowitz J, Corradini MG (2007) An expanded fermi solution for microbial risk assessment. Int J Food Microbiol 113:92–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Peleg M, Normand MD, Corradini MG (2009) Isothermal and non-isothermal kinetic models of chemical processes in foods governed by competing mechanisms. J Agr Food Chem 57:7377–7386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Peleg M, Normand MD, Corradini MG (2009) Interactive software for calculating the principal stresses of compacted cohesive powders with the warren-spring equation. Powder Technol 197:268–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Simpson R (2009) Engineering aspects of thermal food processing. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Singh RP (1999) Conducting laboratory experiments via the internet. Food Technol 53:54–59Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Singh RP, Erdogdu F (2008) Virtual experiments in food processing, 2nd edn. RAR Press, DavisGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    van Boekel MAJS (2009) Kinetic modeling of reactions in foods. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark D. Normand
    • 1
  • Uri Lesmes
    • 1
  • Maria G. Corradini
    • 2
  • Micha Peleg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Food Science, Chenoweth LaboratoryUniversity of MassachusettsAmherstUSA
  2. 2.Instituto de Tecnología, Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias ExactasUniversidad Argentina de la EmpresaCdad. de Buenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations