Skip to main content

Neurophysiology and the Problem of Human Free Will: A Case of “Nihil Sub Sole Novum”?


Over the last decade in Germany, a number of neuroscientists—and among them most prominently Wolf Singer—have claimed to be able to offer scientific evidence derived from neurophysiologic findings to conclusively negate the existence of human free will. In this paper, Singer’s position is examined according to its principal characteristics in order to answer the question whether it is a novel position as opposed to a position pertaining to one of the traditions of western philosophy and anthropology. Furthermore, we try to judge whether the neurobiological findings Singer and others use to justify their position are apt to satisfy the criteria for the presence of scientific evidence, i.e., if they are good reasons to believe that human will is unfree.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. Achinstein, P. 2001. The book of evidence. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. an der Heiden, U., and H. Schneider., Hrsg. 2008. Hat der Mensch einen freien Willen? Die Antworten der grossen Philosophen. Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam Junior.

  3. Augustinus. Ca. 420. Augustini De Civitate Dei Liber V.

  4. Berger, H. 1929. Über das Elektroenkephalogramm des Menschen. Archiv für Psychiatrie 87: 527–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bieri, P. 2005. Unser Wille ist frei, Article published in Der Spiegel 10.01.2005., state 06.01.2013.

  6. Burleigh, M., and W. Wippermann. 1991. The racial state: Germany 1933–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Carnap, R. 1962. Logical foundations of probability. Fourth reprint of the 2nd edn. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

  8. Cochrane, A. 1972. Effectiveness and efficiency. Random reflections on health services. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press Limited (Nachdruck 1999).

  9. d’Holbach, P.H.T. (“Mirabaud, M.”) 1770. Système de la nature ou des loix du monde physique & du monde moral. Amsterdam: Marc-Michel Rey.

  10. Engel, A.K., and W. Singer. 2001. Temporal binding and the neural correlates of sensory awareness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5(1): 16–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. 1992. Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA 268(17): 2420–2425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Feinstein, A.R. 1967. Clinical judgement. Baltimore: The Williams and Wilkins Company.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fletcher, R.H., S.W. Fletcher, and E.H. Wagner. 1996. Clinical epidemiology, 3rd ed. Baltimore: Williams &Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Geyer, Ch., Hrsg. 2004. Hirnforschung und Willensfreiheit. Zur Deutung der neuesten Experimente. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.

  15. Kissler, A. 2006. Habermas und die Willensfreiheit. Article published in the Süddeutsche Zeitung 19.01.2006.

  16. Libet, B., E.W. Wright, and C.A. Gleason. 1982. Readiness potentials preceding unrestricted spontaneous pre-planned voluntary acts. Electroencephalographic and Clinical Neurophysiology 54: 322–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Libet, B. 2004. Haben wir einen freien Willen? In Hirnforschung und Willensfreiheit. Zur Deutung der neuesten Experimente, ed. Ch. Geyer. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lombroso, C. 1896. L’uomo delinquente in rapporto all’Antropologia, alla Guiurisprudenza ed alle discipline carcerarie, Vol. I–III and atlas, 5th Edn. Turin: Fratelli Bocca Editori.

  19. Masuhr, K.F., and M. Neumann. 1992. Neurologie. 2. Auflage. Stuttgard: Hippokrates Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Maurer, K., and T.H. Duncker. 2006. Vorbilder in der Psychiatrie. In Entwicklungen in der Psychiatrie, ed. F. Schneider, 223–230. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Monyer, H., F. Rösler, G. Roth, H. Scheich, W. Singer, C.E. Elger, A.D. Friederici, C. Koch, H. Luhmann, C. von der Malsburg, and R. Menzel. 2004. Das Manifest. Elf führende Neurowissenschaftler über Gegenwart und Zukunft der Hirnforschung. Gehirn und Geist 6:30–37.

  22. Pauen, M. 2004. Illusion Freiheit? Mögliche und unmögliche Konsequenzen der Hirnforschung. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Preuschoff, K., R. Steven, S.R. Quartz, and P. Bossaerts. 2008. Human insula activation reflects risk prediction errors as well as risk. The Journal of Neuroscience 28(11): 2745–2752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Roth, G. 2003. Fühlen, Denken, Handeln: Wie das Gehirn unser Verhalten steuert. Zweite, überarbeitete Auflage. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sackett, D.L., W.M. Rosenberg, J.A. Gray, R.B. Haynes, and W.S. Richardson. 1996. Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 312(7023): 71–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Schulte v. Drach, M.C. 2006. Der freie Wille ist nur ein gutes Gefühl. Interview mit Wolf Singer, published in 25.04.2006. State: 26.09.2009.

  27. Singer, W. 2004. Verschaltungen legen uns fest: Wir sollten aufhören, von Freiheit zu sprechen. In Hirnforschung und Willensfreiheit. Zur Deutung der neuesten Experimente, ed. Ch. Geyer. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Weßling, H. 2011. Theorie der klinischen Evidenz. Versuch einer Kritik der Evidenzbasierten Medizin. Berlin, Münster: LIT Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heinrich Weßling.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weßling, H. Neurophysiology and the Problem of Human Free Will: A Case of “Nihil Sub Sole Novum”?. Medicine Studies 4, 37–51 (2014).

Download citation


  • Human free will
  • Determinism
  • Neurophysiology
  • Mind–body problem
  • Evidence