Paternal-Fetal Harm and Men’s Moral Duty to Use Contraception: Applying the Principles of Nonmaleficence and Beneficence to Men’s Reproductive Responsibility
- 74 Downloads
Discussions of reproductive responsibility generally draw heavily upon the principles of nonmaleficence and beneficence. However, these principles are typically only applied to women due to the incorrect belief that only women can cause fetal harm. The cultural perception that women are likely to cause fetal and child harm is reflected in numerous social norms, policies, and laws. Conversely, there is little public discussion of men and fetal and child harm, which implies that men do not (or cannot) cause such harm. My goal in this paper is to begin to fill the void in the academic literature about men’s reproductive responsibility by highlighting the health-related, economic, and social harms men can cause to potential fetuses and children and then examining what it would mean to hold them responsible for preventing these harms. Applying the principles of nonmaleficence and beneficence to men, I conclude that men have a moral duty to use contraception if their behavior—past, current, or future—could harm the potential fetuses and children who result from their unprotected sexual behavior.
KeywordsContraception Nonmaleficence Paternal-fetal harm Men Responsibility
I'd like to thanks Lisa Schwartzman for reading earlier drafts of this paper. I'd also like to thank my anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.
- Boyce, W.Thomas, Marilyn J. Essex, Abbey Alkon, H.Hill Goldsmith, and C. Helena. 2006. Early father involvement moderates biobehavioral susceptibility to mental health problems in middle childhood. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 45(12): 1510–1520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Campo-Engelstein, L. 2011. No more larking around! Why we need long-acting, reversible male contraceptives. Hasting Center Report 41(5): 22–26.Google Scholar
- Dworkin, Ronald. 1981. What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources. Philosophy & Public Affairs 10: 283–345.Google Scholar
- Dworkin, Gerald. 1987. Intention, foreseeability, and responsibility. In Responsibility, character, and the emotions: New essays in moral psychology, ed. F. Schoeman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Frye, Marilyn. 1983. The politics of reality: Essays in feminist theory. Freedom: The Crossing Press.Google Scholar
- Goldberg, Carey. 2008. The father and the fetus. The Boston Globe, C10.Google Scholar
- Hatcher, R.A., et al. 2004. Contraceptive Technology. New York: Ardent Media.Google Scholar
- Jha, Alok. 2008. Drink and drugs can damage men’s sperm, study suggests. The Guardian. February 19. Tuesday: 7.Google Scholar
- Kass v. Kass. 1998. 91 N.Y.2d 554, 696 N.E.2d 174, 673 N.Y.S.2d 350.Google Scholar
- Knight, James W., and Joan C. Callahan. 1989. Preventing birth: Contemporary methods and related moral controversies. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
- Kukla, R. 2005. Mass hysteria: Medicine, culture, and mothers’ bodies. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Press.Google Scholar
- Laurance, Jeremy. 2008. Why babies can’t wait. Herald Sun. February 9. Saturday: 30.Google Scholar
- Lino, Mark. 2007. Expenditures on children by families, 2006. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion. Miscellaneous Publication No. 1528-2006. United States. http://www.cnpp.usda.gov/Publications/CRC/crc2006.pdf.
- Macrae, Fiona. 2008. Men who smoke “damage health of future children.” Daily Mail. February 19. Tuesday: 12.Google Scholar
- Medicinenet.com. Latex allergy. http://www.medicinenet.com/latex_allergy/page2.htm. Accessed June 11, 2008.
- No author. 2008. Chromosomal abnormalities: Study links dietary folate intake to genetic abnormalities in sperm. Drug Week. 4: 106.Google Scholar
- No author. 2008. Fathers who smoke ‘hit future generations.’ The Daily Telegraph. February 19. Tuesday: 16.Google Scholar
- O’Neill, Onora, and William Ruddick. 1979. Having children: Philosophical and legal reflections on parenthood. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Ruddick, Sara. 1989. Maternal thinking: Towards a politics of peace. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
- Savulescu, J. 2001. Procreative beneficence: Why we should select the best children. Bioethics 15(5): 413–426.Google Scholar
- Scharte M, and G. Bolte. 2012. Increased health risks of children with single mothers: The impact of socio-economic and environmental factors. European Journal of Public Health. Published online June 8: 1–6.Google Scholar
- Sheldon, Sally. 2003. Unwilling fathers and abortion: Terminating men’s child support obligations? The Modern Law Review 66(2): 175–194.Google Scholar
- Smith, Rebecca. 2008. Vitamin B helps men to father healthy child. The Daily Telegraph. March 20. Thursday.Google Scholar
- Sparrow, Robert. 2011. A not-so-new eugenics: Harris and savulescu on human enhancement. The Hastings Center Report 41(1): 32–42.Google Scholar
- Sullivan, Shannon, and Nancy Tuana (eds.). 2007. Race and epistemologies of ignorance. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
- Taylor, Paul. 2008. Eat your greens, dads-to-be. It’s not all about mom. The Globe and Mail (Canada). March 21 (Friday). p. L1.Google Scholar
- U.S. Census Bureau. (2005a). Custodial mothers and fathers and their child support: 2005. http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/childsupport/chldsu05.pdf.
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2008. Administration for Children & Families. Health Marriage Initiative. http://www.acf.hhs.gov/healthymarriage/about/mission.html#background. Accessed April 22, 2008.
- Van Der Boukje, Z., and I. de Beaufort. 2011. Preconception care: a parenting protocol: A moral inquiry into the responsibilities of future parents towards their future children. Bioethics 25(8): 451–457.Google Scholar