Journal of Plant Biology

, Volume 61, Issue 5, pp 301–308 | Cite as

Giant Ragweed Invasion is Not Well Controlled by Biotic Resistance

  • Chaeho Byun
  • Eun Ju Lee
Original Article


The effect of native plant restoration on invasion by giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida), an invasive species, is currently unknown. We hypothesized that (1) functional group identity would be a good predictor of biotic resistance to A. trifida, and (2) mixtures of species would be more resistant to invasion than monocultures. Using seven functional traits, 37 native and non-native plants were divided into three functional groups that differed primarily in longevity and woodiness. We conducted a competition experiment using an additive competition design with A. trifida and monocultures or mixtures of 14 species. Biotic resistance was evaluated by calculating a relative competition index (RCIavg) based on the average performance of A. trifida in treatments compared with that in control. In monocultures, RCIavg of resident plants did not significantly differ among the three functional groups or within each functional group. The highest RCIavg (40%) was observed for some fast-growing annuals (FG1) such as Zea mays and Secale cereal, which were strong competitors. RCIavg of resident plants was not significantly greater in mixtures than in monocultures. Taken together, the results show that plant diversity did not control invasion by A. trifida and that giant ragweed invasion cannot be well controlled by biotic resistance.


Ambrosia trifida Biotic resistance Ecological restoration Functional group Invasive plant management Giant ragweed 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abul-Fatih H, Bazzaz F (1979) The biology of Ambrosia trifida LI Influence of species removal on the organization of the plant community. New Phytol 813–816Google Scholar
  2. Bajwa AA, Chauhan BS, Farooq M, Shabbir A, Adkins SW (2016) What do we really know about alien plant invasion? A review of the invasion mechanism of one of the world’s worst weeds. Planta 244:39–57CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bassett IJ, Crompton CW (1982) The biology of Canadian weeds.: 55.: Ambrosia trifida L. Canadian J Plant Sci 62: 1003–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blumenthal DM, Jordan NR, Svenson EL (2003) Weed Control as a Rationale for Restoration: The Example of Tallgrass Prairie. Ecol Soc 7Google Scholar
  5. Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SW, Poulsen JR, Stevens MH, White JS (2009) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 24:127–135CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brandes D, Nitzsche J (2006) Biology, introduction, dispersal, and distribution of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) with special regard to Germany. Nachrichtenblatt-deutschen Pflanzenschutzdienstes Braunschweig 58:286Google Scholar
  7. Byun C, de Blois S, Brisson J (2013) Plant functional group identity and diversity determine biotic resistance to invasion by an exotic grass. J Ecol 101:128–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Byun C, de Blois S, Brisson J (2015) Interactions between abiotic constraint, propagule pressure, and biotic resistance regulate plant invasion. Oecologia 178:285–296CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Byun C, de Blois S, Brisson J (2018) Management of invasive plants through ecological resistance. Biol Invasions 20:13–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Byun C, Lee EJ (2017) Ecological application of biotic resistance to control the invasion of an invasive plant, Ageratina altissima. Ecol Evol 7:2181–2192CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Catford JA, Jansson R, Nilsson C (2009) Reducing redundancy in invasion ecology by integrating hypotheses into a single theoretical framework. Divers Distrib 15:22–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Connolly J, Wayne P, Bazzaz FA (2001) Interspecific competition in plants: how well do current methods answer fundamental questions? Am Nat 157:107–125CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Davis MA, Grime JP, Thompson K (2000) Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. J Ecol 88: 528–534Google Scholar
  14. Derr JF (2008) Common Reed (Phragmites Australis) Response to Mowing and Herbicide Application. Invas Plant Sci Manage 1: 12–16Google Scholar
  15. Dhileepan K (2012) Reproductive variation in naturally occurring populations of the weed Parthenium hysterophorus. (Asteraceae) in Australia. Weed Sci 60:571–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elton CS (1958) The ecology of invasions by animals and plants, Ed, Vol The University of Chicago Press, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Esler K, Prozesky H, Sharma G, McGeoch M (2010) How wide is the “knowing-doing” gap in invasion biology? Biol Invasions 12: 4065–4075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Frankow-Lindberg BE, Brophy C, Collins RP, Connolly J (2009) Biodiversity effects on yield and unsown species invasion in a temperate forage ecosystem. Ann Bot 103:913–921CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Funk JL, Cleland EE, Suding KN, Zavaleta ES (2008) Restoration through reassembly: plant traits and invasion resistance. Trends Ecol Evol 23:695–703CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Gaudet CL, Keddy PA (1988) A comparative approach to predicting competitive ability from plant traits. Nature 334:242–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gentili R, Gilardelli F, Ciappetta S, Ghiani A, Citterio S (2015) Inducing competition: intensive grassland seeding to control Ambrosia artemisiifolia. Weed Res 55:278–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gower JC (1971) A General Coefficient of Similarity and Some of Its Properties. Biometrics 27:857–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harrison SK, Regnier EE, Schmoll JT, Webb JE (2001) Competition and fecundity of giant ragweed in corn. Weed Sci 49:224–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hazelton EL, Mozdzer TJ, Burdick DM, Kettenring KM, Whigham DF (2014) Phragmites australis management in the United States: 40 years of methods and outcomes. AoB Plants 6Google Scholar
  25. Hock SM, Knezevic SZ, Martin AR, Lindquist JL (2006) Soybean row spacing and weed emergence time influence weed competitiveness and competitive indices. Weed Sci 54:38–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Iannone III BV, Galatowitsch SM (2008) Altering Light and Soil N to Limit Phalaris arundinacea Reinvasion in Sedge Meadow Restoration. Restor Ecol 16:689–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kattge J, DÍAz S, Lavorel S, Prentice IC, Leadley P, BÖNisch G, Garnier E, Westoby M, Reich PB, Wright IJ, Cornelissen JHC, Violle C, Harrison SP, Van Bodegom PM, Reichstein M, Enquist BJ, Soudzilovskaia NA, Ackerly DD, Anand M, Atkin O, Bahn M, Baker TR, Baldocchi D, Bekker R, Blanco CC, Blonder B, Bond WJ, Bradstock R, Bunker DE, Casanoves F, Cavender-Bares J, Chambers JQ, Chapin Iii FS, Chave J, Coomes D, Cornwell WK, Craine JM, Dobrin BH, Duarte L, Durka W, Elser J, Esser G, Estiarte M, Fagan WF, Fang J, FernÁNdez-MÉNdez F, Fidelis A, Finegan B, Flores O, Ford H, Frank D, Freschet GT, Fyllas NM, Gallagher RV, Green WA, Gutierrez AG, Hickler T, Higgins SI, Hodgson JG, Jalili A, Jansen S, Joly CA, Kerkhoff AJ, Kirkup D, Kitajima K, Kleyer M, Klotz S, Knops JMH, Kramer K, KÜHn I, Kurokawa H, Laughlin D, Lee TD, Leishman M, Lens F, Lenz T, Lewis SL, Lloyd J, LlusiÀ J, Louault F, Ma S, Mahecha MD, Manning P, Massad T, Medlyn BE, Messier J, Moles AT, MÜLler SC, Nadrowski K, Naeem S, Niinemets Ü, NÖLlert S, NÜSke A, Ogaya R, Oleksyn J, Onipchenko VG, Onoda Y, OrdoÑEz J, Overbeck G, Ozinga WA, PatiÑO S, Paula S, Pausas JG, PeÑUelas J, Phillips OL, Pillar V, Poorter H, Poorter L, Poschlod P, Prinzing A, Proulx R, Rammig A, Reinsch S, Reu B, Sack L, Salgado-Negret B, Sardans J, Shiodera S, Shipley B, Siefert A, Sosinski E, Soussana JF, Swaine E, Swenson N, Thompson K, Thornton P, Waldram M, Weiher E, White M, White S, Wright SJ, Yguel B, Zaehle S, Zanne AE, Wirth C (2011) TRY–a global database of plant traits. Global Change Biol 17:2905–2935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kaur S, Sandell LD, Lindquist JL, Jhala AJ (2014) Glyphosate-Resistant Giant Ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) Control in Glufosinate-Resistant Soybean. Weed Technol 28:569–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Keddy PA, Twolan-Strutt L, Wisheu IC (1994) Competitive Effect and Response Rankings in 20 Wetland Plants: Are They Consistent Across Three Environments? J Ecol 82:635–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kettenring KM, Adams CR (2011) Lessons learned from invasive plant control experiments: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Appl Ecol 48:970–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. KIL JH, SHIM KC, PARK SH, KOH KS, SUH MH, KU YB, SUH SU, OH HK, KONG HY (2004) Distributions of Naturalized Alien Plants in South Korea. Weed Technol 18:1493–1495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kong C-H, Wang P, Xu X-H (2007) Allelopathic interference of Ambrosia trifida with wheat (Triticum aestivum). Agric Ecosyst Environ 119:416–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lee CS, Cho YC, Shin HC, Kim GS, Pi JH (2010) Control of an invasive alien species, Ambrosia trifida with restoration by introducing willows as a typical riparian vegetation. J Ecol Environ 33:157–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lindig-Cisneros R, Zedler J (2001) Effect of light on seed germination in Phalaris arundinacea L. (reed canary grass). Plant Ecol 155:75–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lulow ME (2006) Invasion by non-native annual grasses: the importance of species biomass, composition, and time among California native grasses of the central valley. Restor Ecol 14:616–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Macarthur R, Levins R (1967) The Limiting Similarity, Convergence, and Divergence of Coexisting Species. Am Nat 101:377–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Milakovic I, Fiedler K, Karrer G (2014) Management of roadside populations of invasive Ambrosia artemisiifolia by mowing. Weed Res 54:256–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Page ER, Nurse RE (2015) Comparing Physical, Chemical, and Cold Stratification Methods for Alleviating Dormancy of Giant Ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) Seeds. Weed Technol 29:311–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Page ER, Nurse RE (2015) Cropping systems and the prevalence of giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida): From the 1950’s to present. Field Crops Res 184:104–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Perelman SB, Chaneton EJ, Batista WB, Burkart SE, LeÓN RJC (2007) Habitat stress, species pool size and biotic resistance influence exotic plant richness in the Flooding Pampa grasslands. J Ecol 95:662–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Podani J (1999) Extending Gower’s General Coefficient of Similarity to Ordinal Characters. Taxon 48:331–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pokorny ML, Sheley RL, Zabinski CA, Engel RE, Svejcar TJ, Borkowski JJ (2005) Plant functional group diversity as a mechanism for invasion resistance. Restor Ecol 13:448–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Reid AM, Morin L, Downey PO, French K, Virtue JG (2009) Doesinvasive plant management aid the restoration of natural ecosystems? Biol Conserv 142:2342–2349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Reinhardt Adams C, Galatowitsch SM (2008) The transition from invasive species control to native species promotion and its dependence on seed density thresholds. Appl Veg Sci 11:131–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schamp B, Aarssen L (2010) The role of plant species size in invasibility: a field experiment. Oecologia 162:995–1004CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Sheley RL, James J (2010) Resistance of Native Plant Functional Groups to Invasion by Medusahead (Taeniatherum caput-medusae). Invas Plant Sci Manage 3:294–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sickels FA, Simpson RL (1985) Growth and Survival of Giant Ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.) in a Delaware River Freshwater Tidal Wetland. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 112:368–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stachowicz JJ, Byrnes JE (2006) Species diversity, invasion success, and ecosystem functioning: disentangling the influence of resource competition, facilitation, and extrinsic factors. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 311:251–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Thomsen M, Brownell K, Groshek M, Kirsch E (2012) Control of Reed Canarygrass Promotes Wetland Herb and Tree Seedling Establishment in an Upper Mississippi River Floodplain Forest. Wetlands 32:543–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tix D, Charvat I (2005) Aboveground biomass removal by burning and raking increases diversity in a reconstructed prairie. Restor Ecol 13:20–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Von Holle B, Simberloff D (2004) Testing Fox’s assembly rule: does plant invasion depend on recipient community structure? Oikos 105:551–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Washitani I (2001) Plant conservation ecology for management and restoration of riparian habitats of lowland Japan. Popul Ecol 43: 189–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Weigelt A, Jolliffe P (2003) Indices of plant competition. J Ecol 91: 707–720Google Scholar
  54. Weiher E, van der Werf A, Thompson K, Roderick M, Garnier E, Eriksson O (1999) Challenging Theophrastus: A common core list of plant traits for functional ecology. J Veg Sci 10:609–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zhu DH, Wang P, Zhang WZ, Yuan Y, Li B, Wang J (2015) Sampling and Complementarity Effects of Plant Diversity on Resource Use Increases the Invasion Resistance of Communities. PLoS ONE 10:e0141559Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Plant Biologists and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Civil and Environmental EngineeringYonsei UniversitySeoulKorea
  2. 2.School of Biological SciencesSeoul National UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations