Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Contingent Valuation Method Applied to the Mining Heritage of Extremadura (Spain)

Geoheritage volume 11, pages 665–679 (2019)Cite this article

Abstract

In this study, the contingent valuation method is used to appraise the value and market potential of mining heritage, serving as a means to evaluate these heritage assets for the society, for the purposes of entertainment, culture or recreation. The method has been applied to the specific case of the region of Extremadura (Spain), an area with a prevalent mining tradition that dates back to prehistoric times, boasting countless mining-related remains of recognised value. Among those vestiges, 20 enclaves were selected for use in this study following research carried out by the Institute of Geology and Mining in Spain. A survey has been used to estimate the public willingness to pay for the conservation, restoration and protection of mining heritage assets that could be visited by both local people and others. Three payment values (7, 13 and 20 euros) were established to classify respondents’ responses and thus estimate the degree of interest expressed in currency units, which were shown by the mining heritage of Extremadura as a possible destination for a tourist trip. While a high percentage (43%) of respondents did not know what the mining heritage is, after the introduction to the survey included in the surveys, it is concluded that most would be willing to pay an amount to visit it. The results reveal a market potential of more than €130 million without bearing in mind the indirect value generated by these resources, underscoring the high value that society attaches to these mining remains.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

References

  • Arrow K, Solow R, Portney PR, Leamer EE, Radner R, Schuman H (1993) Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Fed Regist 58(10):4601–4614

    Google Scholar 

  • Azqueta D (1996) Valoración económica del medio ambiente: una revisión crítica de los métodos y sus limitaciones. Información Comercial Española 75:37–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Báez A, Herrero LC (2012) Using contingent valuation and cost-benefit analysis to design a policy for restoring cultural heritage. J Cult Herit 13:235–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman IJ, Turner RK (1992) Evaluation of the environment: the contingent valuation method. CSERGE working paper, GEC-92-18

  • Berrocal MC, Cuenca EC, Solano JAG (2006) Nuevos datos sobre el Calcolà -tico de Extremadura: El yacimiento de La Sierrecilla (Santa Amalia, Badajoz). Spal Revista de Prehistoria y Arqueologà a de la Universidad de Sevilla 15:51–70

  • Botelho A, Pinto L, Lourenço-Gomes L, Valente M (2016) Social sustainability of renewable energy sources in electricity production: an application of the contingent valuation method. Sustain Cities Soc 26:429–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmona MC, Calatrava J (2004) Valor social de la conservación del lince ibérico. Comportamiento del mercado contingente. Conference paper. V Congreso de Economía Agraria. Santiago de Compostela (Spain)

  • Carson RT (2012) Contingent valuation: a practical alternative when prices aren’t available. J Econ Perspect 26(4):27–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson RT, Hanemann M (1992) A preliminary economic analysis of recreational fishing losses related to the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Report to the Attorney General of the State of Alaska

  • Carson RT, Hanemann MW (2005) Contingent valuation. Handbook of environmental economics. V. 2:821–936

  • Carson RT, Wright J, Carson N, Alberini A, Flores N (1995) A bibliography of contingent valuation papers and studies. NRDA (Natural Resource Damage Assessment, Inc.), La Jolla

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson RT, Hanemann M, Kopp RJ, Krosnick JA, Mitchell RC, Presser S, Ruud PA, Smith VK, Conaway M, Martin K (1996) Was the NOAA panel correct about contingent valuation? Discussion paper 96–20. Resources of the future. 32 p

  • Carson RT, Hanemann M, Kopp RJ, Krosnick JA, Mitchell RC, Presser S, Ruud PA, Smith VK, Conaway M, Martin K (1998) Referendum design and contingent valuation. The NOAA panels no-vote recommendation. Rev Econ Stat 80(2):335–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson RT, Flores NE, Meade NF (2001) Contingent valuation: controversies and evidence. Environ Resour Econ 19:173–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson RT, Mitchell RC, Hanemann M, Kopp RJ, Presser S, Ruud PA (2003) Contingent valuation and lost passive use: damages from the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Environ Resour Econ 25:257–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung LTO (2016) The effect of geopark visitors’ travel motivations on their willingness to pay for accredited geo-guided tours. Geoheritage 8:201–2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciriacy-Wantrup SV (1947) Capital returns from soil-conservation practices. Am J Agric Econ 29(4):1181–1196

    Google Scholar 

  • Damigos D, Menegaki M, Kaliampakos D (2016) Monetizing the social benefits of landfill mining: evidence from a contingent valuation survey in a rural area in Greece. Waste Manag 51:119–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis R (1960) The value of outdoor recreation: an economic study of the Maine Woods. Doctoral dissertation in economics. Harvard University

  • Del Guidice V, De Paola P (2016) The contingent valuation method for evaluating historical and cultural ruined properties. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 223:595–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon D, Pagliola S (1998) Economic analysis and environmental assessment. Indicators and economic valuation unit, environment department. The World Bank

  • Elhuyar F (1825) Memoria sobre el influjo de la minería en la agricultura, industria, población y civilización de la Nueva España. Imp. Amarita

  • Fernández Corrales JM (1988) Minería y asentamientos romanos de Extremadura. Su problemática. Alcántara 15:107–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira S, Cunha Marques R (2015) Contingent valuation method applied to waste management. Resour Conserv Recycl 99:111–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaglias A, Mirasgedis S, Tourkolias C, Georgopoulous E (2016) Implementing the contingent valuation method for supporting decision making in the waste management sector. Waste Manag 53:237–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Rodríguez M, Fernández-Escalante E (2016) Geo-climbing and environmental education: the value of La Pedriza Granite Massif in the Sierra de Guadarrama National Park, Spain. Geoheritage 9:141–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-016-0187-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González T (1832) Registro y relación general de minas de la Corona de Castilla. Imp. M. Burgos. Madrid. 2 Tomos

  • Hanemann MW (1994) Valuating the environment through contingent valuation. Econ Perspect 8(4):19–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen TB (1997) The willingness-to pay for the Royal Theatre in Copenhagen as a public good. J Cult Econ 21:1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartwick JM (1977) Intergenerational equity and the investing of rents from exhaustible resources. Am Econ Rev 67(5):972–974

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurtado V, y Hunt, M (1999) Extremadura, en Las primeras etapas metalúrgicas de la Península Ibérica. Delibe S, G. y Montero, I (Eds) Ed. Instituto Universitario Ortega y Gasset. Madrid, 241–274

  • IGME (2011) historia del Patrimonio Minero de Extremadura. 228 p

  • Instituto Geológico y Minero de España (2009) Estudio del Patrimonio Minero de Extremadura. 228 p

  • Johannesson M, Johansson PO, O’Conor R (1992) The value of private safety versus the value of public safety. J Risk Uncertain 13:263–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolstad CD (1999) Environmental economics. Oxford University 400 p

  • Kriström B, Riera P (1997) El método de la valoración contingente: Aplicaciones al medio rural español. Economía Agraria 179:133–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Larruga E (1795) Memorias políticas y económicas. Sobre los frutos, comercio, fábricas y minas de España: con la inclusión de los reales decretos, órdenes, cédulas, aranceles y ordenanzas expedidas para su gobierno y comercia. Minas y producciones de la provincia de Extremadura. Imp. Benito Cano. Madrid

  • Lin B, Tan R (2017) Estimation of the environmental values of electric vehicles in Chinese cities. Energy Policy 104:221–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llanderas A (1998) Historia de la minería de Extremadura desde los orígenes del ser humano. Museo de Geología 5:45–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchán C, Sánchez A (2013) Consideraciones sobre el patrimonio minero desde la perspectiva de un servicio geológico nacional. Boletín paranaense de geociencias 70:77–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Marella G, Raga R (2014) Use of the contingent valuation method in the assessment of a landfill mining project. Waste Manag 34:1199–1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchel RC, Carson RT (1998) Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Resource for the future, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Munasinghe M (1992) Environmental economics and valuation in development decision making. Working paper. World Bank, Environment Department, Washington, D.C., USA

  • Pagiola S (1996) Economic analysis of investments in cultural heritage: insights from environmental economics. Report of the World Bank

  • Puche O, Hervás AM, Mazadiego LF (2011) El Patrimonio Histórico Minero-Metalúrgico en España: Su impacto en el turismo cultural. De Re Metallica 17:27–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall A, Ives BC, Eastman C (1974) Bidding games for valuation for aesthetic environmental improvements. J Environ Econ Manag 1:132–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riera P (1993) Rentabilidad social de las infraestructuras: Las Rondas de Barcelona, un análisis coste-beneficio. Ed. Civitas. 171 p

  • Riera P (1994) El Método de Valoración Contingente. Instituto de Estudios Fiscales. Madrid (Spain), 112 p

  • Rodríguez Díaz A et al (2014) La minería protohistórica en Extremadura: El caso del estaño en el cerro de San Cristóbal de Logrosán (Cáceres). CPAG 24:167–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez Gómez J (1989) De minería, metalurgia y comercio de metales. Ed IGME-Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez A (2010) Estudio del Patrimonio Minero de Extremadura. In: Florido P, Rábano I (eds) Una visión multidisplinar del patrimonio geológico y minero. Cuadernos del Museo Geominero, no. 12. Instituto Geológico y Minero (IGME)

  • Shogren JF, Shin SY, Hayes DJ, Kliebenstein JB (1994) Resolving differences in willingness to pay and willingness to accept. Am Econ Rev 84:255–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow RM (1988) Grown theory and after. Am Econ Rev 78(3):307–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Sueiras JC, Martínez JM (2010) El valor económico de los espacios naturales. In: Esteve MA, Martínez JM, Soro B (eds) Espacios Naturales protegidos en la región de Murcia: Valoración ecológica, económica y jurídica. Editum, Murcia

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun C, Zhu X (2014) Evaluating the public perceptions of nuclear power in China: evidence from a contingent valuation survey. Energy Policy 69:397–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thanh D, Viet Huynh K (2017) Estimating residents’ willingness to pay for groundwater protection in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta. Appl Water Sci 7(1):421–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson MS, Read JL, Lian M (1984) Feasibility of willingness-to pay measurement in chronic asthritis. Med Decis Mak 4:195–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson E, Berger M, Blomquist G, Allen S (2002) Valuing the arts: a contingent valuation approach. J Cult Econ 26:87–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatachalam L (2004) The contingent valuation method: a review. Environ Impact Assess Rev 24:89–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Water Resource Council (1979) Procedures for evaluation of national economic development (NED): benefits and costs in water resources planning (level C). Final rule. Fed Regist 44(242):72892–72977

    Google Scholar 

  • Water Resource Council (1983) Principles and guidelines for water and related land resources implementation studies

  • World Bank (1998) Handbook on economic analysis of investment operations. Washington

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Alejandro Sánchez (IGME), Ester Boixerau (IGME) Juana Vegas (IGME), Monserrat Trío (IGME) and Carmen Marchán (Ministry of Industry, Spain) for their assistance and contributions in developing the ideas presented here and by the cession of the photographs of mining heritage of Extremadura that have allowed us to include in this investigation. We also want to thank Jade Santos for the help provided during the paper submission.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Minas y Energía, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, C/ Alenza 4, 28003, Madrid, Spain

    Luis F. Mazadiego, Bernardo Llamas, César Rodríguez de Górgolas, Juan Pous & Octavio Puche

  2. Fortia Energía, C/ Bauzá 21, 28033, Madrid, Spain

    César Rodríguez de Górgolas

  3. VALORIZA Gestión, C/ Castellana 83-85, 28045, Madrid, Spain

    Juan Pous

Authors
  1. Luis F. Mazadiego
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bernardo Llamas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. César Rodríguez de Górgolas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Juan Pous
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Octavio Puche
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis F. Mazadiego.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mazadiego, L.F., Llamas, B., de Górgolas, C.R. et al. The Contingent Valuation Method Applied to the Mining Heritage of Extremadura (Spain). Geoheritage 11, 665–679 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-018-0319-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-018-0319-7

Keywords

search

Navigation