Skip to main content

Accessible Geoparks in Iberia: a Challenge to Promote Geotourism and Education for Sustainable Development


This work aims at providing an overview regarding accessibility conditions for people with functional diversity among the 15 UNESCO Global Geoparks (UGGs) located in the Iberian Peninsula—4 in Portugal and 11 in Spain—from the point of view of a disabled user wishing to visit a geopark. Website information and a questionnaire composed of closed and multiple choice questions directly administrated to the geopark managers were used aiming at inquiring about facilities provided to people requiring adapted access conditions, including mobility, vision, hearing and cognitive dimensions of access both under the aim of geotourism activities or in the frame of educational programmes. Results show that Iberian UGGs display several facilities for the development of geotourism and education that meet the needs of people with functional diversity. Accessibility facilities to receive people with physical impairments are common, but sensory and communication access facilities are scarce. Geoparks’ websites generally lack information concerning facilities for special groups, and the web design does not meet the needs of people that have difficulties with written word and speech. The constraints on implementation of programmes aimed at disabled visitors can be partially overcome if geoparks’ leaders seek to integrate partners that currently develop activities for persons with disabilities. Geodivulgar (an innovation project from the Complutense University) and Science without Barriers (an association; Ciencia sin Barreras in Spanish) are pioneer initiatives for the outreach of geology among people with functional diversity in Spain, which currently develops activities and resources that can be of great help to enlarge the geoparks’ offer about geotouristic tours and/or educational programmes for disabled visitors. The acquired experience at the Basque Coast UGG can be of great help for other partners of the UGG Network to fully fulfil their roles as agents of sustainable development through geotourism and education for all.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9


  1. Ambrose I, Garcia A, Papamichail K, Veitch C (2017) Accessible tourism destination management handbook ENAT, Turismo de Portugal, Lisboa. Accessed 21 Feb 2018

  2. ANED (2013) National accessibility requirements and standards for products and services in the European single market: overview and examples. Academic Network of European Disability experts (ANED) – VT/2007/005. file:///C:/Users/Helena%20Henriques/Downloads/ANED%202012%20Accessibility%20-%20additional%20survey%20report%20FINAL.pdf. Accessed 21 Feb 2018

  3. AP (2017) Accessible Portugal, Accessed 30 Oct 2017

  4. Bowtell J (2015) Assessing the value and market attractiveness of the accessible tourism industry in Europe: a focus on major travel and leisure companies. J Tour Futur 1(3):203–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Burlando M, Firpo M, Queirolo C, Rovere A, Vacchi M (2011) From geoheritage to sustainable development: strategies and perspectives in the Beigua Geopark (Italy). Geoheritage 3(2):63–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K (2010) Research methods in education. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  7. Darcy S (1998) People with a disability and tourism bibliography. Online Bibliography 7. Accessed 30 Oct 2017

  8. Dowling RK (2009) Geotourism’s contribution to local and regional development. In: de Carvalho C, Rodrigues J (eds) Geotourism and local development. Câmara Municipal de Idanha-a-Nova, Portugal, pp 15–37

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dowling RK (2011) Geotourism’s global growth. Geoheritage 3(1):1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Eder W, Patzak M (2004) Geoparks—geological attractions: a tool for public education, recreation and sustainable economic development. Episodes 27(3):162–164

    Google Scholar 

  11. EU (2018a) European accessibility act. Improving the accessibility of productsand services in the single market. Employment, Social Affairs & Inclusion, European Commission. file:///C:/Users/Helena%20Henriques/Downloads/Factsheet_accessibility%20act_a.pdf. Accessed 21 Feb 2018

  12. EU (2018b) United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Employment, Social Affairs & Inclusion, European Commission. Accessed 21 Feb 2018

  13. Farsani NT, Coelho C, Costa C (2011) Geotourism and geoparks as novel strategies for socio-economic development in rural areas. Int J Tour Res 13:68–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fesharaki O, García-Frank A, Iglesias Álvarez N, Gomez-Heras M, Martín-Perea D, Rico R (2016) Diseño universal y materiales multisensoriales en las actividades de divulgación de Geodivulgar con la asociación Ciencia sin Barreras. Geo-Temas 16(1):729–732

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gálvez A, Ballesteros F, García-Frank A, Gil S, Gil-Ortiz A, Gomez-Heras M, Martínez-Frías J, Parro LM, Parro V, Pérez-Montero E, Raposo V, Vaquerizo JA (2017) Inclusive planetary science outreach and education: a pioneering European experience. EPSC Abstracts Vol. 11:EPSC2017–905-2. Accessed 30 Oct 2017

  16. García-Frank A, Pérez Barroso R, Espín Forjan B, Benito Manjón P, De Pablo Gutiérrez L, Gomez-Heras M, Sarmiento GN, Canales Fernández ML, González Acebrón L, Muñoz García MB, García Hernández R, Hontecillas D, Ureta Gil MS, Del Moral B (2014a) Divulgación de la Geología: nuevas estrategias educativas para alumnos con necesidades educativas especiales por discapacidad intelectual. In: Gómez EN (ed) El CSIC en la escuela: investigación sobre la enseñanza de la ciencia en el aula 10. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, pp 56–67

    Google Scholar 

  17. García-Frank A, Gomez-Heras M, Gonzalo Parra L, Canales Fernández ML, Muñoz García MB, González-Acebrón L, García Hernández R, Hontecillas D, Iglesias Álvarez N, Salazar Ramírez RW, Fesharaki O, Navalpotro T, Reviejo M, Rodrigo Sanz A, Del Moral B, Sarmiento GN, Ureta S (2014b) Ready-to-serve geology! Portable kits for scientific divulgation to people with functional diversity. In: Gómez Chova L, López Martínez A, Candel Torres I (eds) ICERI 2014 proceedings. IATED Academy, Sevilla, pp 4666–4672

    Google Scholar 

  18. García-Frank A, Gomez-Heras M, Fesharaki O, Iglesias Álvarez N, Gonzalo Parra L (2016) “Science without Barriers”: towards the take-off of social palaeontology. Palaeontological Association Newsletter 91:50—55 ISSN: 0954–9900. https://wwwpalassorg/sites/default/files/media/publications/newsletters/number_91/number91pdf. Accessed 20 Feb 2018

  19. García-Frank A, Gomez-Heras M, Fesharaki O (2017) Inclusive outreach practices in palaeontology: inclusive-coworking. Geophys Res Abstr 19:EGU2017–EG12720

    Google Scholar 

  20. GGN (2017) About GGN. Global Geoparks Network. Accessed 30 Oct 2017

  21. Gomez-Heras M, García-Frank A (2016) Accessible fieldwork-success stories! IAGD Newsletter January 2016, p 2. Accessed 30 Oct 2017

  22. Gomez-Heras M, Gonzalo L, García-Frank A, Sarmiento GN, González L, Muñoz MB, García R, Hontecillas D, Ureta MS, Canales ML (2014) Geología para sordociegos: una experiencia multisensorial para la divulgación de la ciencia. In: Gómez EN (ed) El CSIC en la escuela: investigación sobre la enseñanza de la ciencia en el aula 10. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, pp 45–55

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gomez-Heras M, González-Acebrón L, Muñoz-García B, García-Frank A, Fesharaki O (2017) A stratigraphy fieldtrip for people with visual impairment. Geophys Res Abstr 19:EGU2017–EG14996

    Google Scholar 

  24. Henriques M (2015) Geosites, management of. In: Tiess G, Majumder T, Cameron P (eds) Encyclopedia of Mineral and Energy Policy. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Henriques MH, Brilha J (2017) UNESCO Global Geoparks: a strategy towards global understanding and sustainability. Episodes 40(4):349–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Henriques MH, Pena dos Reis R, Brilha J, Mota T (2011) Geoconservation as an emerging geoscience. Geoheritage 3:117–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Henriques MH, Tomaz C, Sá AA (2012) The Arouca Geopark (Portugal) as an educational resource: a study case. Episodes 35(4):481–488

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hurtado H, Dowling R, Sanders D (2014) An exploratory study to develop a Geotourism typology model. Int J Tour Res 16:608–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. IGCP (2012) Statutes of the International Geoscience and Geoparks Programme. IGCP. Accessed 30 Oct 2017

  30. Lima EA, Machado M, Nunes JC (2013) Geotourism development in the Azores archipelago (Portugal) as an environmental awareness tool. Czech J Tour 2(2):126–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. McKeever P, Zouros N (2005) Geoparks: celebrating earth heritage, sustaining local communities. Episodes 28(4):274–278

    Google Scholar 

  32. Michopoulou E, Darcy S, Ivor A, Buhalis D (2015) Accessible tourism futures: the world we dream to live in and the opportunities we hope to have. J Tour Futur 1(3):179–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mineiro C (2017) (Coord) Guia de boas práticas de acessibilidade. Comunicação Inclusiva em Monumentos, Palácios e Museus. Turismo de Portugal. Accessed 20 Feb 2018

  34. Navalpotro T, Berrocal M, De la Fuente Olmos D, Gonzalo Parra L, Fesharaki O (2015) “Sí se puede” hacer una actividad de paleontología con personas con sordoceguera. In: García-Frank A (ed) Libro de Resúmenes de la I Jornada de Divulgación Científica Inclusiva, pp 4–6. Accessed 8 Mar 2018

  35. Orion N (1989) Development of a high-school geology course based on field trips. J Geol Educ 37(1):13–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Orion N (1993) A model for the development and implementation of thefield trips as an integral part of the science curriculum. Sch Sci Math 93(6):325–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Panizza M, Piacente S (2008) Geomorphosites and geotourism. Rev Geogr Acadêmica 2(1):5–9

    Google Scholar 

  38. Romañach J, Lobato M (2005) Functional diversity. A new term in the struggle for dignity in the diversity of the human being. Independent Living Forum (Spain). Accessed 30 Oct 2017

  39. Ruban D (2017) Geodiversity as a precious national resource: a note on the role of geoparks. Resour Policy 53:103–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. SGE (2017) Madrid 2017 Geoloday. Soc. Geol. España. Accessed 15 Nov 2017

  41. TAW (2017) Proyecto T.A.W. Centro Tecnologico. Accessed 30 Oct 2017

  42. Toboso M (2011) Rethinking disability in Amartya Sen’s approach: ICT and equality of opportunity. Ethics Inf Technol 13(2):107–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. TP (2014) Guia de Boas Práticas de Acessibilidade – Turismo Ativo. Turismo de Portugal. Accessed 19 Feb 2018

  44. TP (2017) All for all. Turismo de Portugal. Accessed 21 Feb 2018

  45. UN (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Resolution 70/1 adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015. Accessed 30 Oct 2017

  46. UN (2016) International Year of Sustainable Tourism for Development, 2017. Resolution 70/193 adopted by the General Assembly on 22 December 2015. Accessed 30 Oct 2017

  47. UN (2017) World Population Prospects. The 2017 Revision. Key Findings and Advance Tables. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division. Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP/248. Accessed 20 Feb 2018

  48. UNESCO (2016) Unesco Global Geoparks. Celebrating Earth Heritage, Sustaining local Communities. UNESCO. Accessed 30 Oct 2017

  49. UNICEF (2010) Education for all global monitoring report: reaching the marginalized. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  50. UNWTO (2016) World tourism day 2016 “tourism for all—promoting universal accessibility” good practices in the accessible tourism supply chain. World Tourism Organization, Madrid 24 p. Accessed 21 Feb 2018

    Google Scholar 

  51. WAI (2017) Web accessibility initiative. Accessed 30 Oct 2017

  52. WT&TC (2015) Travel & tourism economic impact 2015—Spain. World Travel & Tourism Council, London Accessed 30 Oct 2017

    Google Scholar 

  53. WT&TC (2017a) Travel & tourism economic impact 2017—Portugal, London. Accessed 30 Oct 2017

  54. WT&TC (2017b) Travel & tourism economic impact 2017—Spain, World Travel & Tourism Council WTTC, London. Accessed 30 Oct 2017

  55. ZP (2017) About the zero project. Essl Foundation. Accessed 30 Oct 2017

Download references


This work is a contribution to the project “PIMCD GEODIVULGAR: Geología y Sociedad” currently “Proyecto INNOVA-DOCENCIA n° 49 (2017-18)”, developed at the Universidad Complutense de Madrid/Associación Ciencia sin Barreras (Spain), and it is supported by FEDER funds through the Competitiveness Factors Operational Programme (COMPETE) and national funds by the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia in the frame of the UID/Multi00073/2013 project (Portugal). We are grateful to two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Helena Henriques.

Electronic Supplementary Material


(DOCX 37 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Henriques, M.H., Canales, M.L., García-Frank, A. et al. Accessible Geoparks in Iberia: a Challenge to Promote Geotourism and Education for Sustainable Development. Geoheritage 11, 471–484 (2019).

Download citation


  • Accessible tourism
  • Geotourism
  • Iberian UNESCO Global Geoparks
  • Geodivulgar/Science without Barriers projects