Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Role of the Geotouristic Guide in Earth Science Education: Towards a More Critical Society of Land Management

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Geoheritage Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Primary and secondary education in Spain does not satisfactorily cover the geoscientific concepts, which explains the great difficulty of citizens to understand the dynamics of their own planet, and does not contribute to a more interventionist and critical citizenship facing land projects. Scientific community is worried about the reduction in this discipline, and a need for a new approach—which should give more weight to field trips—is being manifested. In this context, geoparks would take an active role, due to the fact that they have an important function in organizing educational outdoors activities at all levels. Nevertheless, there is a lack of research focused on the role of geoparks as tools that promote educational opportunities for visitors and students. On the one hand, this article aims to provide a study of the effectiveness of the interpretative provision offered by the geotouristic guide of the Geologic Park of Aliaga to youngsters aged 12 to 17 years, and also the evaluation of this guide in their Earth science learning process. On the other hand, we study the knowledge acquisition in an intensive summer course offered to children aged 5 to 10 years. According to the results of the surveys, geodiversity and land management contents explained by the geotouristic guide are retained significantly by students and children, and significant differences were observed in the acquisition of knowledge in Earth sciences. In addition, this article adds a practical approach, and proposes some features that should be present in a geotouristic guide playing an effective role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson OR (1976) The experience of science: a new perspective for laboratory teaching. Teachers College Press, Columbia

    Google Scholar 

  • Barberá O, Valdés P (1996) El trabajo práctico en la enseñanza de las Ciencias: una revisión. Enseñ Cienc Tierra 14(3):365–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusi D, Bach J, Estrada MR, Oms O, Vicens E, Obrador A, Maestro E, Biosca J (2011) El GEOCAMP: un sitio web y una herramienta de edición para las actividades de campo en Geología. Enseñ Cienc Tierra 19(1):57–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhay DN, Best LA (2015) Informal learning at Stonehammer and English Riviera Geoparks. Geoheritage 7:165–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carneiro CDR, Toledo MCM, Almeida FFM (2004) Dez motivos para a inclusão de temas de Geologia na Educação Básica. Rev Bras Geosci 4:553–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford KR, Black R (2012) Visitor understanding of the geodiversity and the geoconservation value of the Giant’s causeway world heritage site, Northern Ireland. Geoheritage 4:115–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De la Corte D (2009) Geosciences and environmental education: training professionals to develop education projects. In: Neto de Carvalho C, Rodrigues J (eds). New challenges with geotourism. Proceedings of the VIII European geoparks conference, Idanha-a-Nova, pp 214

  • Eder W, Patzak M (2004a) International geological correlation Programme (IGCP)/International Geoscience Programme (IGCP). Episodes 27(2):150–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Eder W, Patzak M (2004b) 2 Geoparks-geological attractions: a tool for public education, recreation and sustainable economic development. Episodes 27(3):162–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Escorihuela J, Dowling R (2015) Analysis of the geotouristic activity in the geologic park of Aliaga, Spain: progress, threats and challenges for the future. Geoheritage 7:299–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escorihuela J (2016) El método de geodidáctica desarrollado en el Parque Geológico de Aliaga (Teruel): incorporación de edades más tempranas en la enseñanza de las ciencias de la tierra. Publ Didact 17:46–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Escorihuela J (2017) Ineffectiveness in natural resource management in modern society: geoparks proposed as possible tools for increasing the awareness in the short to medium term. Episodes 40(1):57–62

  • Fuertes-Gutiérrez I, Pérez M, González-Villanueva R, Arias F, Hernández R, De Miguel J, Escorihuela J, Cuevas-González J, García JM (2014) El valor didáctico del patrimonio geológico y el valor patrimonial de los recursos didácticos. Enseñ Cienc Tierra 22(1):69–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel J, Herrero C, de Dios CJ, Anguita F, Muñoz F, Ortega O, Sánchez J (1997) El seminario sobre metodologías en las prácticas de campo: Rascafría 96. Resultados y valoración. Enseñ Cienc Tierra 5(1):69–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray M (2004) Geodiversity, valuing and conserving abiotic nature. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Ham SH (1992) Environmental interpretation: a practical guide for people with big ideas and small budgets. North American Press, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriques MH, Tomaz C, Abreu Sá A (2012) The Arouca Geopark (Portugal) as an educational resource: a case study. Episodes 35(4):481–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Hose TA (1995) Selling the story of Britain’s stone. Environ Interpret 10(2):16–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Hose TA (2000) “Geoturismo”. Interpretación geológica y Promoción de la conservación geológica para turistas. In: Baretino D, Wimbledon WAP, Gallego E (eds) Patrimonio Geológico: Conservación y Gestión. Instituto Geológico Minero de España, Madrid, pp 137–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner PA (1992) Epistemology, practical work and academic skills in science education. Sci Educ 1:273–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macedo (1997) La educación científica, un aprendizaje accesible a todos. In: UNESCO (ed). Proyecto Principal de educación en América Latina y Caribe. Orealc, Santiago, pp 5–7

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeerver P, Zouros N (2005) Geoparks: celebrating earth heritage, sustaining local communities. Episodes 28(4):274–278

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeerver P, Zouros, N, Patzak M (2010) The UNESCO global network of national geoparks. IOP The Geroge Wright Forum. http://www.georgewright.org/271mckeever.pdf. Accesed 29 July 2016

  • Rauner F (2007) El conocimiento práctico y la competencia de acción en la profesión. Rev Eur Form Prof 40:58–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Renschler CS, Harbor J (2002) Soil erosion assessment tools from point to regional scales-the role of geomorphologists in land management research and implementation. Geomorphology 47:189–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reys AC, Del Lama EA, Dehira LK (2007) Monumentos da cidade de São Paulo: formas de alteração e conservação. Rev CPC (Centro de Preservação Cultural da USP) 5:93–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavella AM, Daros WR (2002) Valores modernos y posmodernos en las expectativas de vida de los jóvenes, UCEL, Rosario

  • Zouros N (2004) The European geoparks network. Episodes 27(3):165–171

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia Escorihuela.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Escorihuela, J. The Role of the Geotouristic Guide in Earth Science Education: Towards a More Critical Society of Land Management. Geoheritage 10, 301–310 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-017-0236-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-017-0236-1

Keywords

Navigation