Advertisement

Geoheritage

, Volume 6, Issue 4, pp 241–256 | Cite as

Lessons from US Fossil Parks for Effective Informal Science Education

  • Renee M. Clary
  • James H. Wandersee
Original Article

Abstract

US fossil parks are unique venues that bridge informal field collecting sites and protected national parks that prohibit any type of specimen acquisition. Typically, fossil parks provide collecting opportunities for visitors for a nominal fee, allowing them to retain a small number of fossils. Often administered by a museum or community, fossil parks promote sustainable development of geotourism, while providing visitors with a tangible reminder of their excursion into another geological time and paleoenvironment. Our in-depth research and analysis of US fossil park sites resulted in the identification of the venues and site characteristics that optimized visitors’ understanding of geological time, biodiversity, and evolution, in addition to providing a fun collecting excursion. Although we do not advocate that national parks and protected sites allow visitors to collect mementoes of their visit, we propose that our fossil park research can provide guidelines for effective interpretation and display of the geological features of these protected sites. While some fossil parks promoted appreciation of a geological site or past environment, not all of them facilitated visitor understanding. Effective interpretation can promote meaningful learning for visitors, leading to increased geological understanding and awareness of the site’s importance, and therefore, an acceptance of the need to preserve it.

Keywords

Fossil parks Informal education Geoscience education Geological interpretation Public interpretation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the opportunities to share the educational implications of our fossil park research with an international audience, through both the Geoheritage symposium at the 34th International Geological Congress and the dissemination of our research results through Geoheritage. Professors Bernie Joyce and José Brilha deserve special recognition for organizing geoheritage efforts and sustaining international interest in protecting those sites of geological importance for the future.

References

  1. Anderson W (1998) Iowa’s geological past: three billion years of earth history. University of Iowa Press, Iowa CityGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson D, Lucas K, Ginns I (2003) Theoretical perspectives on learning in an informal setting. J Res Sci Teach 40:177–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bastedo J (1999) Penn Dixie Paleontological and Outdoor Education Center: visit to a classic geological and outdoor education center. New York State Geological Association 71st Annual Meeting Guidebook, FredoniaGoogle Scholar
  4. BBC News (August 30, 2006) Stolen dinosaur fossils recovered, British Broadcasting Corporation: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/wales/south_east/5299016.stm
  5. Bernstein S (2003) A limestone way of learning. Chron High Educ 50(7):B5Google Scholar
  6. Cable News Network (26 June 2003) Finding trilobites by the bucket, for free. Retrieved 7 July 2003 from http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/science/06/26/fossil.park.ap./index.html
  7. Chi M (1997) Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: a practical guide. J Learn Sci 6(3):271–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clary RM, Wandersee JH (2008) Earth science teachers’ perceptions of an autonomous fieldwork assignment in a nationwide online paleontology course. J Geosci Educ 56(2):149–155Google Scholar
  9. Clary RM, Wandersee JH (2009a) Incorporating informal learning environments and local fossil specimens in Earth science classrooms: a recipe for success, Science Education Review 8: http://www.scienceeducationreview.com/open_access/index.html
  10. Clary RM, Wandersee JH (2009b) All are worthy to know the Earth: Henry De la Beche and the origin of geological literacy. Sci Educ 18(10):1359–1376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clary RM, Wandersee JH (2011) Geobiological opportunities to learn at US fossil parks. In Feig A, Stokes A (eds) Qualitative inquiry in geoscience education research: Geological Society of America Special Paper 474, pp 113–134Google Scholar
  12. Clary RM, Wandersee JL, Guyton J, Williams M (2012) Backyard citizen science: building a future generation of scientists through entomology, The Science Teacher X:51–57Google Scholar
  13. Creswell J (1994) Research design: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  14. DeBoer G (1991) A history of ideas in science education. Teachers College Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Drewes C (2005) Discovering Devonian microfossils, ABLE 2005 Workshop. URL: http?/www.eeob.iastate.edu/faculty/DrewesC/htdocs/microfossilsABLE.doc
  16. Earth Science Literacy Initiative (ESLI) (2010) Earth Science Literacy Principles: the big ideas and supporting concepts of Earth science. National Science Foundation. http://www.earthscienceliteracy.org/es_literacy_6may10_.pdf
  17. Falk J (2001) Free choice science education: how we learn science outside of school. Teachers College Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Falk J, Dierking L (2000) Learning from museums: visitor experiences and the making of meaning. Alta Mira Press, Walnut CreekGoogle Scholar
  19. Falk J, Dierking L (2002) Lessons without limit: how free-choice learning is transforming education. Alta Mira Press, Walnut CreekGoogle Scholar
  20. Felzien L, Cooper J (2005) Modeling the research process: alternative approaches to teaching undergraduates. J Coll Sci Teach 34:42–46Google Scholar
  21. Hemler D, Repine T (2006) Teachers doing science: an authentic geology research experiences for teachers. J Geosci Educ 54:93–102Google Scholar
  22. Hose T (1995) Selling the story of Britain’s stone. Environ Interpr 10(2):16–17Google Scholar
  23. Langer E (1997) The power of mindful learning. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  24. Larwood J, Durham E (2005) Earth heritage: world heritage. Involving people in geodiversity. Status Design, SpaldingGoogle Scholar
  25. Lawrence F, Huffman D, Appeldoorn K (2005) Enhancing the instructional environment. J Coll Sci Teach 3:112–115Google Scholar
  26. Long L (2005) Arizona promotes ‘geotourism’, The Arizona Daily Star. Lee Enterprises, TucsonGoogle Scholar
  27. McComas W (2006) Science teaching beyond the classroom: the role and nature of informal learning environments. Sci Teach 73(1):26–30Google Scholar
  28. McConnell D, Steer D, Owens K (2003) Assessment and active learning strategies for introductory geology courses. J Geosci Educ 51:205–216Google Scholar
  29. Meyers H, Manchester S (1997) The Oligocene Bridge Creek flora of the John Day Formation. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  30. Michael J, Modell H (2003) Active learning in secondary and college science classrooms: a working model for helping the learner to learn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  31. Mintzes J, Wandersee J, Novak J (eds) (1998) Teaching science for understanding: a human constructivist view. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  32. Neuendorf K (2002) The content analysis guidebook. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  33. Novak J (1998) The pursuit of a dream: education can be improved. In: Mintzes J, Wandersee J, Novak J (eds) Teaching science for understanding: a human constructivist view. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 3–29Google Scholar
  34. Oregon Paleo Lands Institute (2005) Oregon Paleo Project, URL: http://www.oregonpaleoproject.org
  35. Orion N, Hofstein A (1994) Factors that influence learning during a scientific field trip in a natural environment. J Res Sci Teach 31:1097–1119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Patzak M (2000) Tourism and geodiversity: the case of GEOPARKS, United National Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. UNESCO Division of Earth Sciences, ParisGoogle Scholar
  37. Persson P-E (2000) The changing science center: sustaining our mission into the 21st century, Dimensions, URL: http://www.astc.org/pubs/dimensions/2000/jan-feb/changing.htm
  38. Rennie L, Johnston D (2004) The nature of learning and its implications for research in learning from museums. Sci Educ 88:S4–S16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Roy M, Doss L (2007) Building migratory bridges. Sci Teach 74(8):56–63Google Scholar
  40. Singer SR, Hilton ML, Schweingruber HA (eds) (2005) America’s lab report: investigations in high school science. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  41. Stoll J (2001) Fossil park—one for the ages! Fossil Park. Citizens for the Olander Park System, SylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  42. Stueve A, Cook S, Drew D (2002) The geotourism study: phase I executive summary. Travel Industry Association of America, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  43. Tashakkori T, Teddlie C (1998) Mixed methodology: combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  44. Wandersee JH, Clary RM (2006) Fieldwork: new directions and examples in informal science education research. In: Mintzes J, Leonard W (eds) NSTA handbook of college science teaching: theory, research, & practice. NSTA Press, Arlington, pp 167–176Google Scholar
  45. Wandersee JH, Clary RM (2007) Learning on the trail: a content analysis of a university arboretum’s exemplary interpretative science signage system. Am Biol Teach 69(1):16–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yin R (2003) Case study research: design and methods, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The European Association for Conservation of the Geological Heritage 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeosciencesMississippi State UniversityMississippi StateUSA
  2. 2.Louisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations