Advertisement

Geoheritage

, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp 299–315 | Cite as

Geological, Geographical and Legal Considerations for the Conservation of Unique Iron Oxide and Sulphur Flows at El Laco and Lastarria Volcanic Complexes, Central Andes, Northern Chile

  • Rodrigo Guijón
  • Fernando Henríquez
  • José Antonio Naranjo
Original Article

Abstract

Considering the exceptional geological characteristics of iron oxide and sulphur lavas structures cropping out at El Laco and Lastarria volcanic complexes in Northern Chile, their geographical context, and the Chilean legal framework for conservation, the authors make a general assessment of the geological heritage value of both volcanoes, while analysing the possibilities and challenges that arise in order to protect them. Relevant issues in this matter are the lack of appropriate laws and of applied geoconservation experience in the country, and the difficulty of attracting financial resources but also a big potential for conciliating conservation with mining, different alternatives of tourism—including geotourism—, or other sustainable initiatives, in a naturally and culturally diverse and rich region, already known as a world class tourist destination. Thus results the need to identify the relevant geosites present in each volcano, to emphasize their study and knowledge, as well as a proactive role of public authorities in order to effectively protect these extremely rare and vulnerable geological features. Analysing the specific cases of both volcanic complexes as possible geological heritage locations, the authors aim to highlight the main problems that need to be solved in order to introduce proper geoconservation in the area.

Keywords

Chile Geoconservation Geosites Geotourism Geological heritage Geodiversity Mining 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This article is supported by Fondecyt project no. 1070428 and is a contribution to the Plutons project, National Science Foundation no. EAR-0908281. Valuable comments given by anonymous reviewers have allowed original manuscript improvement.

References

  1. Alpers CN, Brimhall GH (1988) Middle Miocene climatic change in the Atacama Desert, northern Chile: evidence from supergene mineralization at La Escondida. Geol Soc Am Bull 100:1640–1656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Calaforra JM, Fernández-Cortés Á (2006) Geotourism in Spain: resources and environmental management. In: Dowling RK, Newsome D (eds) Geotourism. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 199–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Consejería de Medio Ambiente de la Junta de Andalucía (2006) La geodiversidad andaluza ante el reto del uso sostenible. In: Medio Ambiente en Andalucía. Informe 2006. Sevilla, pp 45–63Google Scholar
  4. Cortés A (2000) Lugares de interés científico para efectos mineros. Dissertation, III Jornadas de Derecho de Minería, Antofagasta, Noviembre 2000Google Scholar
  5. David Roche GeoConsulting (2005) GeoValue: Valuing Geodiversity for Conservation. Initial Scoping Study. Development of the Geodiversity Profile. Exeter: David Roche GeoConsulting. Available at: http://www.sustainableaggregates.com/docs/theme3/miro_ma_4_2_016a.pdf. Accessed 26 July 2009
  6. De Grosbois AM, Eder W (2008) Geoparks—a new tool for education, conservation and recreation. Environ Geol 55:465–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dowling R, Newsome D (2006) Geotourism’s issues and challenges. In: Dowling RK, Newsome D (eds) Geotourism. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 242–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dudley N (ed) (2008) Guidelines for applying protected area management categories. IUCN, Gland, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  9. Dudley N, Stolton S (eds) (2008) Defining protected areas: an international conference in Almeria, Spain. IUCN, Gland, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  10. El Wartiti M, Malaki A, Zahraoui M, El Ghannouchi A, Di Gregorio F (2008) Geosites inventory of the northwestern Tabular Middle Atlas of Morocco. Environ Geol 55:415–422Google Scholar
  11. Elízaga E, Palacio J (1996) Valoración de puntos y/o lugares de interés geológico. In: Cendrero A (ed) El patrimonio geológico. Bases para su valoración, protección, conservación y utilización. Serie Monografías. Ministerio de Obras Públicas, Transportes y Medio Ambiente, Madrid, pp 61–79Google Scholar
  12. Evans B (2005) Geoparks, coalfields and South Wales—a sustainable combination? Z Dtsch Geowiss 156(3):373–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fernández J (2007) Identificación y evaluación de geositios en el Parque Nacional Torres del Paine. Memoria de título. Departamento de Geología, Universidad de Chile, SantiagoGoogle Scholar
  14. Garrido R, Romero E (2004) La potencialidad turística del patrimonio geológico-minero del Parque Natural Sierra de Aracena y Picos de Aroche (Huelva, España). Pasos. Revista Turismo Patrim Cultural 2(2):215–232Google Scholar
  15. Gates AE (2006) Geotourism: a perspective from the USA. In: Dowling RK, Newsome D (eds) Geotourism. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 157–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grandgirard V (1999) L’évaluation des géotopes. Geol Insubrica 4(1):59–66Google Scholar
  17. Gray M (2004) Geodiversity: valuing and conserving abiotic nature. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  18. Gray M (2008) Geoheritage 1. Geodiversity: a new paradigm for valuing and conserving geoheritage. Geoscience Canada, Geological Association of Canada (New Series, Report)Google Scholar
  19. GSA (2008) The role of government in energy and mineral resources. GSA Position Statement. Available at: http://www.geosociety.org/positions/position11.htm. Accessed 23 January 2009
  20. Hasenauer H, Putzhuber F, Mirtl M, Wenzel W (2007) Multifunctional land use: the Eisenwurzen region of the Austrian Alps. In: Mander U, Wiggering H, Helming K (eds) Multifunctional land use. Meeting future demands for landscape, goods and services. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 341–354Google Scholar
  21. Heitzmann P, Reynard E, Stürm B (2006) Geotopschutz in der Schweiz–quo vadis? In: Rosendahl W, Junker B, Megerle A, Vogt J (eds) Geotope–Bausteine der Regionalentwicklung, 10. Internationale Jahrestagung der Fachsektion GeoTop in der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Geowissenschaften, May 23–26 2006, Ulm, Germany. Schriftenreihe Dtsch Ges Geowiss 44:48–54Google Scholar
  22. Henríquez F, Naslund HR, Nyström JO, Naranjo JA (2004) Igneous textures in magnetite eruptive products at El Laco, Chile. Dissertation, IAVCEI General Assembly 2004, Pucón, ChileGoogle Scholar
  23. Ibáñez JJ (2004) Biodiversidad, Geodiversidad y Constructos Metodológicos para sus Análisis. In: VII Congreso Nacional de Medio Ambiente. Grupo de Trabajo 5. Nuevas perspectivas para la conservación de la diversidad del patrimonio natural. November 25, Madrid, Spain. Available at: http://www.conama.org/documentos/gt5.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2009
  24. Instituto Geológico y Minero de España (2009) Documento metodológico para la elaboración del inventario español de Lugares de Interés Geológico (IELIG). Instituto Geológico y Minero de España. Available at: http://www.igme.es/internet/patrimonio/novedades/METODOLOGIA%20IELIG%20V12.pdf. Accessed 13 May 2010
  25. Lou J, Wu F, Jong S (2007) Types of geoheritage and evaluation of Dengkou Geopark, Inner Mongolia, China. In: Zhao X, Jian J, Dong S, Li M, Zhao T (eds) Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on development within geoparks. Geological Publishing House, Beijing, pp 314–318Google Scholar
  26. Luebert F, Pliscoff P (2006) Sinópsis bioclimática y vegetacional de Chile. Universitaria, SantiagoGoogle Scholar
  27. Mager D (2005) Ressourcennutzung und Geotope. interpret–online (Online-Series for Heritage Interpretation), 5, Freiburg. Available at: http://www.freidok.uni-freiburg.de/volltexte/1756/pdf/io-05Mager.pdf. Accessed 28 July 2009
  28. Maksaev V, Gardeweg M, Ramírez CF, Zentilli M (1988) Aplicación del método trazas de fisión (fission track) a la datación de cuerpos de magnetita de El Laco e Incahuasi en el altiplano de la Región de Antofagasta. In: Congreso Geológico Chileno, No. 5, Actas 1: B1-B23. SantiagoGoogle Scholar
  29. Maksaev V, Townley B, Palacios C, Camus F (2007) Metallic ore deposits. In: Moreno T, Gibbons W (eds) The geology of Chile. The Geological Society, London, pp 179–199Google Scholar
  30. Megerle A, Megerle H (2003) Geoparks und Landschaftsmarketing. Standort Z angew Geographie 3:147–148Google Scholar
  31. Mostny G (2006) Prehistoria de Chile. 16th edn. Editorial Universitaria, SantiagoGoogle Scholar
  32. Naranjo JA (1985) Sulphur flows at Lastarria volcano in the North Chilean Andes. Nat 313(6005):778–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Naranjo JA (1988) Coladas de azufre de los volcanes Lastarria y Bayo en el norte de Chile: reología, génesis e importancia en geología planetaria. Revista Geol Chile 15(1):3–12Google Scholar
  34. Naranjo JA (2010) Geología del Complejo Volcánico Lastarria, Región de Antofagasta. Servicio Nacional de Geología y Minería, Carta Geológica de Chile, Serie Geología Básica, No. 123, 1 mapa escala 1:25.000. SantiagoGoogle Scholar
  35. Naranjo JA, Henríquez F, Andrade B (2007) Iron and sulphur flows in Central Andes, northern Chile. In: Anon (ed) Earth: our changing planet. Proceedings of IUGG XXIV General Assembly, Perugia, Italy, 2007Google Scholar
  36. Naranjo JA, Henríquez F, Andrade B (2008) Ages for the iron oxide volcanism at El Laco Volcanic Complex, central Andes. Dissertation, IAVCEI General Assembly 2008, Reikiavik, IslandGoogle Scholar
  37. Naranjo JA, Henríquez F, Nyström JO (2010) Subvolcanic contact metasomatism at El Laco Volcanic Complex, Central Andes. Andean Geol 37(1):110–120Google Scholar
  38. Naslund HR, Henríquez F, Nyström JO, Vivallo W, Dobbs M (2002) Magmatic iron ores and associated mineralization: Examples from the Chilean High Andes and Coastal Cordillera. In: Porter TM (ed) Hydrothermal iron oxide copper–gold and related deposits: a global perspective, 2. Porter GeoConsultancy (PGC) Publishing, Adelaide, pp 207–226Google Scholar
  39. Nyström JO, Henríquez F (1994) Magmatic features of iron ores of the Kiruna type in Chile and Sweden: ore textures and magnetite geochemistry. Econ Geol 89:820–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pena dos Reis R, Henriques MH (2009) Approaching an integrated qualification and evaluation system for geological heritage. Geoheritage 1:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pforr C, Megerle A (2006) Geotourism: a perspective from southwest Germany. In: Dowling RK, Newsome D (eds) Geotourism. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 119–139Google Scholar
  42. Reynard E, Fontana G, Kozlik L, Scapozza C (2007) A method for assessing “scientific” and “additional values” of geomorphosites. Geographica Helvetica 62(3):148–158Google Scholar
  43. Romero H, Rivera A, Fernández P (1997) Climatología de la Puna de Atacama y su relación con los recursos hídricos. In: Anon (ed) Actas del II Simposio Internacional de Estudios Altiplánicos, “El Altiplano. Ciencia y conciencia en los Andes”, October 19–21 1993, Arica, Chile. Departamento de Postgrado y Postítulo, Vicerrectoría Académica y Estudiantil, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, pp 87–93Google Scholar
  44. Schilling M (2007) Geoparques y Geositios: posibilidades de educación, difusión y valoración del patrimonio geológico a través del Geoturismo en Chile. ECOengen, Universidad Central 7:19–27Google Scholar
  45. SERNATUR (2006) Catastro de Áreas Turísticas. Available at: http://www.sernatur.cl/institucional/PDF/estadisticas/medio‐amb‐territ/area‐tur‐i‐iv‐2006.pdf. Accessed 28 July 2009
  46. Serrano S, Ruiz P (2007) Geodiversidad: concepto, evaluación y aplicación territorial. El caso de Tiermes Caracena (Soria). Bol Asoc Geógrafos Esp 45:79–98Google Scholar
  47. Stern CR, Moreno H, López-Escobar L, Clavero JE, Lara LE, Naranjo JA, Parada MA, Skewes MA (2007) Chilean volcanoes. In: Moreno T, Gibbons W (eds) The geology of Chile. The Geological Society, London, pp 145–178Google Scholar
  48. Stürm B (2005) Geoconservation in Switzerland. General Situation 2005. In: Report for the European Geoconservation Overview by ProGEO. Berne, Swiss Academy of Sciences, Working Group for Geotopes. Available at: http://www.geosciences.scnat.ch/downloads/geotopes/GEOCONS_05_CH.pdf. Accessed 8 August 2009
  49. UNESCO (2008) Guidelines and Criteria for National Geoparks seeking UNESCO’s assistance to join the Global Geoparks Network. Available at: http://www.unesco.org/science/earth/doc/geopark/2008guidelinesJuneendorsed.pdf. Accessed 28 July 2009
  50. Van Loon AJ (2008) Geological education of the future. Earth Sci Rev 86:247–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Voth A (2008) Los geoparques y el geoturismo: nuevos conceptos de valorización de recursos patrimoniales y desarrollo regional. In: XI Coloquio Ibérico de Geografía. Tercera ponencia: Dimensiones sociales y políticas del medio ambiente y la ordenación del territorio, Alcalá de Henares-Pastrana, Spain, October 1–4 2008. Available at: http://www.geogra.uah.es/web_11_cig/cdXICIG/docs/ponencia3.htm. Accessed 28 July 2009
  52. Wang L (2007) Multi-designated geoparks face challenges in China’s heritage conservation. J Geogr Sci 17(2):187–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Weischet W (1975) Las condiciones climáticas del desierto de Atacama como desierto extremo de la Tierra. Revista Geografía Norte Gd I I(3–4):363–373Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rodrigo Guijón
    • 1
  • Fernando Henríquez
    • 2
  • José Antonio Naranjo
    • 3
  1. 1.Ministerio del Medio AmbienteSantiagoChile
  2. 2.Facultad de Ingeniería, Departamento de Ingeniería en MinasUniversidad de Santiago de ChileSantiagoChile
  3. 3.Servicio Nacional de Geología y Minería (SERNAGEOMIN)SantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations