Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Religion and Robots: Towards the Synthesis of Two Extremes

International Journal of Social Robotics volume 13, pages 539–556 (2021)Cite this article

Abstract

Humanity has been dreaming of robots since the ancient times. Historically, robots — originally called automata — have been the products of technology and faith. The relationship between robots and religion has disappeared in the last two centuries, as science and religion parted ways, and have typically been seen in opposition. Nowadays, as robots and AI are going to spread in human society, new possibilities and new ethical challenges are on the horizon. In this paper, we summarise the state of the art in robotics and religion, and propose a taxonomy for robot morphology that takes into account the factor of religion. The taxonomy encompasses the novel concept of ‘theomorphic robots’, referred to robots that carry the shape of something divine.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Besancon A (2000) The forbidden image: an intellectual history of iconoclasm. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yerxa DA (2015) Religion and innovation: antagonists or partners?. Bloomsbury Academic, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dianich S (1987) Chiesa in missione. Per un’ecclesiologia dinamica (in Italian), San Paolo Edizioni

  4. Bell G (2006) No more SMS from Jesus: ubicomp, religion and techno-spiritual practices. In: UbiComp 2006: ubiquitous computing, pp 141–158

  5. Muller MJ, Christiansen E, Nardi B, Dray S (2001) Spiritual life and information technology. Commun ACM 44(3):82–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kimura T (2017) Robotics and AI in the sociology of religion: a human in imago roboticae. Soc Compass 64(1):6–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Duffy BR (2003) Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robot Auton Syst 42(3–4):177–190

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Tondu B (2012) Anthropomorphism and service humanoid robots: an ambiguous relationship. Ind Robot Int J 39:609–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Weiss A, Evers V (2011) Exploring cultural factors in human-robot interaction: a matter of personality?. Presented at the 2nd International Workshop on Comparative Informatics, IWCI 2011, Denmark

  10. Nomura T et al (2008) What people assume about humanoid and animal-type robots: cross-cultural analysis between Japan, Korea, and the United States. Int J Hum Robot 05(01):25–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Trovato G et al (2013) Towards culture-specific robot customisation: a study on greeting interaction with Egyptians. Presented at the The 22nd IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (ROMAN 2013), Gueongju, South Korea

  12. Trovato G, Ham JRC, Hashimoto K, et al (2015) Investigating the effect of relative cultural distance on the acceptance of robots. In: Social robotics. Springer, Cham, pp 664–673

  13. Trovato G, Eyssel F (2017) Mind attribution to androids: a comparative study with Italian and Japanese adolescents. In: 2017 26th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN), pp 561–566

  14. Arras KO, Cerqui D (2005) Do we want to share our lives and bodies with robots? A 2000 people survey. Technical Report Nr. 0605-001, Autonomous Systems Lab, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL)

  15. Geraci RM (2006) Spiritual robots: religion and our scientific view of the natural world. Theol Sci 4(3):229–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Russell B (2017) Robots: the 500-year quest to make machines human. Scala Arts & Heritage Publishers Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  17. Taube KA (2012) Creation and cosmology. In: The Oxford handbook of mesoamerican archaeology

  18. The Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life (2012) The Global Religious Landscape. Pew Research center. https://www.pewforum.org/global-religious-landscape.aspx

  19. Hill P, Pargament KI (2003) Advances in the conceptualization and measurement of religion and spirituality. Implications for physical and mental health research. Am Psychol 58:64–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Okpaku SO (1998) Clinical methods in transcultural psychiatry. American Psychiatric Pub, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  21. Smith A (2014) Older adults and technology use. Internet, Science & Tech, Pew Research Center, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  22. European Commission (2012) Public attitudes towards robots. Special Eurobarometer 382

  23. McIntyre AJ (1979) Romantic transcendence and the robot in Heinrich Von Kleist and E.T.A. Hoffmann. Ger Rev Lit Cult Theory 54(1):29–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Foerst A (1998) Cog, a humanoid robot, and the question of the image of god. Zygon 33(1):91–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Higgins RS (2013) Of gods and monsters: supernatural beings in the uncanny valley. Annual meeting of the European association for biblical studies. Leipzig, Germany

  26. Vidal D (2007) Anthropomorphism or sub-anthropomorphism? An anthropological approach to gods and robots. J Roy Anthropol Inst 13:917–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Durkheim É (1915) The elementary forms of the religious life. G. Allen & Unwin, London

    Google Scholar 

  28. Geraci RM (2007) Robots and the sacred in science and science fiction: theological implications of artificial intelligence. Zygon 42(4):961–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Foerst A (2005) God in the machine: what robots teach us about humanity and god. Plume

  30. Lindstrom L (1993) Cargo cult: strange stories of desire from melanesia and beyond. Univ of Hawaii Pr, Honolulu

    Google Scholar 

  31. Asimov I (1951) I, Robot. Gnome Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  32. Adler MJ (1993) The Angels and Us. Paperback

  33. Haslam N (2006) Dehumanization: an integrative review. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 10(3):252–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Haslam N, Kashima Y, Loughnan S, Shi J, Suitner C (2008) Subhuman, inhuman, and superhuman: contrasting humans with nonhumans in three cultures. Soc Cognit 26(2):248–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Trovato G, Cuellar F, Nishimura M (2016) Introducing “theomorphic robots”. In: 2016 IEEE-RAS 16th international conference on humanoid robots (Humanoids), pp 1245–1250

  36. Trovato G, Lucho C, Huerta-Mercado A, Cuellar F (2018) Design strategies for representing the divine in robots. In: Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, New York, NY, USA, pp 29–35

  37. Grant M, Hazel J (2002) Who’s who in classical mythology. Psychology Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  38. Nelson V (2009) The secret life of puppets. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  39. Chapuis A, Droz E (1958) Automata: a historical and technological study. Neuchâtel: Editions du Griffon, London

    Google Scholar 

  40. Tybjerg K (2003) Wonder-making and philosophical wonder in Hero of Alexandria. Stud Hist Philos Sci Part A 34(3):443–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Herodotus, Godley AD (1921) Herodotus. With an English translation by AD Godley. Heinemann, London

  42. Mikalson JD (2004) Herodotus and religion in the Persian wars. Univ of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, p 2004

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ghosh S, Banerjee UK (2006) Indian puppets. Abhinav Publications, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  44. Riskin J (2016) The restless clock: a history of the centuries-long argument over what makes living things tick. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  45. Gell A (1994) The technology of enchantment and the enchantment of technology. In: Coote J (ed) Anthropology, art, and aesthetics. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  46. Riskin J (2012) Machines in the garden. In: Biagioli M, Riskin J (eds) Nature engaged. Palgrave Macmillan US, Washington, pp 229–248

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  47. King E (2002) Clockwork prayer: a sixteenth-century mechanical monk. Blackbird 1(1):1–29

    Google Scholar 

  48. Soós K, Rácz J (1990) Eine Automatenfigur in Budapest (in German “An automaton figure in Budapest). Z Kunsttechnol Konserv 4:207–214

    Google Scholar 

  49. Saif M (2006) The evolution of persian thought regarding art and figural representation in secular and religious life after the coming of Islam. Macalester Islam J 1(2):6

    Google Scholar 

  50. Thomas RM (1987) Computer technology: an example of decision-making in technology transfer. In: Thomas RM, Kobayashi VN (eds) Educational technology—its creation, development and cross-cultural transfer. Pergamum Press, Oxford, pp 25–34

    Google Scholar 

  51. Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of innovations, 5th edn. Free Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  52. Sharif J (1921) Islam in India or the Qanun I Islam. Oriental Book Reprint Corporation, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  53. Speziale F (2007) Il simbolismo mistico del volto umano nel trattato (in urdu) Sūrat-i ma’lūma-yi ṣuwari’ilm di Karīm Allāh’Āshiq (in Italian). J Asiatique 295(2):439–459

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  54. Brittlebank K (1995) Sakti and Barakat: the power of Tipu’s tiger. An examination of the tiger emblem of Tipu Sultan of Mysore. Mod Asian Stud 29(2):257–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Riek L et al (2010) Ibn Sina steps out: exploring Arabic attitudes toward humanoid robots. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on new frontiers in human–robot interaction, vol 1. AISB, Leicester

  56. Vālmīki (1981) The Yoga-vásishtha-mahárámáyana of Válmiki. Bonnerjee and Company

  57. Debroy B (2015) The Mahabharata: complete and unabridged, 2015th edn. Penguin Books India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ganapati Bappachi Robotic Aarti. Robolab Technologies Pvt Ltd. [Online].https://www.robolab.in/ganapati-bappachi-robotic-aarti/. Accessed 04 Feb 2019

  59. Grimaud E (2008) Dieux & robots: Les théâtres d’automates divins de Bombay (in French). L’Archange Minotaure, Apt

    Google Scholar 

  60. Kaplan F (2004) Who is afraid of the humanoid? Investigating cultural differences in the acceptance of robots. Int J Hum Robot 01(03):465–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Idel M (1990) Golem: Jewish Magical and Mystical Traditions on the Artificial Anthropoid. State University of New York Press, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  62. Woodruff A, Augustin S, Foucault B (2007) Sabbath day home automation: “It’s Like Mixing Technology and Religion”. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, New York, NY, USA, pp 527–536

  63. Dundes A (2002) The shabbat elevator and other sabbath subterfuges: an unorthodox essay on circumventing custom and Jewish character. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham

    Google Scholar 

  64. Okakura K (2012) The ideals of the east. Jazzybee Verlag, Loschberg

    Google Scholar 

  65. Mori M (1989) The Buddha in the robot. Kosei Publishing Company, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  66. Currell D (2015) Shadow puppets and shadow play. Crowood, Marlborough

    Google Scholar 

  67. Schodt FL (1988) Inside the Robot Kingdom - Japan, Mechatronics, and Coming Robotopia. Kodansha, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  68. Yamaguchi M (2005) ‘Karakuri: the ludic relationship between man and machine in Tokugawa Japan’, in Japan at Play. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  69. Takanishi A (2011) Humanoid robots, and the culture and history of the Japanese people. Acta Philos 20(1):29–52

    Google Scholar 

  70. NISSEI ECO. Pepper Funeral Homes & Cremation Facility, Inc. | Canton PA funeral home and cremation. Pepper Funeral Homes & Cremation Facility, Inc. | Canton PA funeral home and cremation. https://www.PepperFuneralHomes.com/. Accessed 22 Aug 2018

  71. Uriu D, Odom W, Gould H (2018) Understanding automatic conveyor-belt columbaria: emerging sites of interactive memorialization in Japan. In: Proceedings of the 2018 designing interactive systems conference, New York, NY, USA, pp 747–752

  72. Nishio S, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2007) Geminoid: teleoperated android of an existing person. In: Humanoid robots: new developments. Armando Carlos de Pina Filho. InTech, Vienna, Austria, pp 582–591

  73. Trovato G, Zecca M, Kishi T, Endo N, Hashimoto K, Takanishi A (2013) Generation of humanoid robot’s facial expressions for context-aware communication. Int J Hum Robot 10(01):1350013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Nakayasu A, Tomimatsu K (2009) Himawari plant robot: creature expression using shape-memory-alloy actuator crowd robots. In: ACM SIGGRAPH ASIA 2009 art gallery and emerging technologies: adaptation, New York, NY, USA, pp 72–72

  75. ‘aibo’, aibo. http://aibo.com/. Accessed 22 Aug 2018

  76. ‘The Source for X10 & X10 Pro Genuine Products’. https://www.x10.com/. Accessed 22 Aug 2018

  77. Sherwood H (2017) Robot priest unveiled in Germany to mark 500 years since Reformation. The Guardian, 30-May-2017

  78. ‘Robot monk blends science and Buddhism at Chinese temple’, Reuters, 22 Apr 2016

  79. Gaver W, Blythe M, Boucher A, Jarvis N, Bowers J, Wright P (2010) The prayer companion: openness and specificity, materiality and spirituality. New York, NY, USA, pp 2055–2064

  80. Atheist F, Must-SEE: iranian robot, constructed by Qur’an teacher, instructs Muslim children how to pray. Friendly Atheist

  81. Jds. COSMODROMIUM: Mechanical Devils. COSMODROMIUM, 21 Apr 2011

  82. Trovato G, Lucho C, Ramon A, Ramirez R, Rodriguez L, Cuellar F (2018) The creation of SanTO: a robot with “divine” features. Presented at the 15th international conference on ubiquitous robots, Honululu, USA

  83. Wyche SP, Aoki PM, Grinter RE (2008) Re-placing faith: reconsidering the secular-religious use divide in the United States and Kenya. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, New York, NY, USA, pp 11–20

  84. Burckhardt T (1967) Sacred art in east and west: its principles and methods. Airlift

  85. Council of Trent (1563) De Invocatione, veneration et reliquiis sanctorum, et de sacris imaginibus, vol 2. Norman P. Tanner, London

  86. Lopez Pinto A (2014) Common sense approach to the restoration of sacred art. Studia Gilsoniana 3:537–545

    Google Scholar 

  87. Leonard SA, McClure M (2003) Myth and knowing: an introduction to world mythology, 1st edn. McGraw-Hill Education, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  88. Rosenberg D (1994) World mythology, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill Education, Lincolnwood

    Google Scholar 

  89. Latour B (1991) Nous n’avons jamais été modernes (La découverte). English translation revised and augmented: We Have Never Been Modern, Simon and Schuster. 31 England and Harvard University Press

  90. Li D, Rau PLP, Li Y (2010) A cross-cultural study: effect of robot appearance and task. Int J Soc Robot 2(2):175–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Lohse M, Hegel F, Swadzba A, Rohlfing K, Wachsmuth S, Wrede B (2007) What can I do for you? Appearance and application of robots. In: Workshop on the reign of catz and dogz? The role of virtual creatures in a computerised society

  92. ‘LG’s new Hub Robot can integrate all your home appliances’. CNET. https://www.cnet.com/reviews/lg-hub-robot-preview/. Accessed 19 Aug 2018

  93. van Breemen A, Yan X, Meerbeek B (2005) iCat: an animated user-interface robot with personality. In: Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, New York, NY, USA, pp 143–144

  94. Saldien J, Goris K, Yilmazyildiz S, Verhelst W, Lefeber D (2008) On the design of the huggable robot probo. J Phys Agents 2(2):3–12

    Google Scholar 

  95. Roomba Robot Vacuum | iRobot. https://www.irobot.com/For-the-Home/Vacuuming/Roomba/. Accessed 22 Aug 2018

  96. HEXA the six-legged robot plant chases the sun to look after its succulent. designboom | architecture & design magazine, 13-Jul-2018. https://www.designboom.com/technology/hexa-robot-plant-vincross-succulent-07-13-2018/. Accessed 22 Aug 2018

  97. Hamann H et al. (2017) Flora robotica: an architectural system combining living natural plants and distributed robots. arXiv:1709.04291 [cs]

  98. Mazzolai B, Laschi C, Dario P, Mugnai S, Mancuso S (2010) The plant as a biomechatronic system. Plant Signal Behav 5(2):90–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Le Petit Prince—the Cute Little Gardener Meant for Mars (w/Video). https://phys.org/news/2009-09-le-petit-prince-cute.html. Accessed 22 Aug 2018

  100. Reeves B, Nass C (1996) The media equation: how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  101. Cuéllar FF, Peñaloza CI, López JA (2016) Educational robots as promotors of cultural development. In: The eleventh ACM/IEEE international conference on human robot interaction, Piscataway, NJ, USA pp 547–547

  102. Trovato G et al (2015) “Olá, my name is Ana”: a study on Brazilians interacting with a receptionist robot. Presented at the the 17th international conference on advanced robotics, Istanbul, Turkey

  103. McCloud S (1994) Understanding comics: the invisible art, Reprint edn. William Morrow Paperbacks, New York

    Google Scholar 

  104. Blow M, Dautenhahn K, Appleby A, Nehaniv CL, Lee D (2006) The art of designing robot faces: dimensions for human–robot interaction. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on human–robot interaction, New York, NY, USA, pp 331–332

  105. Wodehouse AJ, Ion WJ (2010) Information use in conceptual design: existing taxonomies and new approaches. Int J Des 4(3):53–65

    Google Scholar 

  106. Shibata T, Wada K, Tanie K (2004) Tabulation and analysis of questionnaire results of subjective evaluation of seal robot in Japan, U.K., Sweden and Italy. In: 2004 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA’04, 2004, vol 2, pp 1387–1392

  107. AUR Robotic Desk Lamp «  Guy Hoffman. http://guyhoffman.com/aur-robotic-desk-lamp/. Accessed 09 Jul 2018

  108. Basalla G (1988) The evolution of technology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  109. Kaptelinin V (2014) Affordances and design. The Interaction Design Foundation, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  110. Jamone L et al (2017) Affordances in psychology, neuroscience and robotics: a survey. IEEE Trans Cognit Dev Syst PP(99), 1–1

  111. Rajput SA (2016) The source, meanings and use of “mudra” across religions. Int J Comput Res Dev 1(1):36–41

    Google Scholar 

  112. Marzal M (1976) Diez hipótesis de interpretación del catolicismo popular (Ten hypotheses of interpretation of popular Catholicism), Sígueme

  113. Renfrew C (2008) Neuroscience, evolution and the sapient paradox: the factuality of value and of the sacred. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 363(1499):2041–2047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Deloria V (1999) Spirit and Reason: The Vine Deloria, Jr. Reader. Fulcrum Publishing, Golden

    Google Scholar 

  115. Schonenberg B, Bartneck C (2010) Mysterious machines. Piscataway, NJ, USA, pp 349–350

  116. Watson B (2016) Light: a radiant history from creation to the quantum age. Bloomsbury Publishing, New York

    Google Scholar 

  117. Ferguson G, Ferguson GW (1959) Signs and symbols in Christian art. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  118. Douglas M (2003) Purity and danger: an analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. Psychology Press, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  119. Greer MA (2002) Daruma eyes: the sixth century founder of Zen Buddhism and Kung Fu had the earliest recorded Graves’ ophthalmopathy. Thyroid 12(5):389–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. IEEE Standards Association. Ethically Aligned Design, Version 2 (EADv2) 2018

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of International Liberal Studies, Waseda University, 11-1430, 1-6-1 Nishi-Waseda, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo-to, 169-8050, Japan

    Gabriele Trovato

  2. Notre Dame de Vie Institute, 205 Chemin de Sainte-Garde, 84210, Saint-Didier, France

    Loys De Saint Chamas

  3. Graduate School of Letters, Arts and Sciences, Waseda University, 1-24-1 Toyama, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8644, Japan

    Masao Nishimura

  4. Department of Psychology, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Av. Universitaria 1801, San Miguel, Lima, Peru

    Renato Paredes

  5. Department of Industrial Design, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands

    Cesar Lucho

  6. Anthropological Section, Department of Social Sciences, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Av. Universitaria 1801, San Miguel, Lima, Peru

    Alexander Huerta-Mercado

  7. Mechatronic Specialty, Engineering Department, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Av. Universitaria 1801, San Miguel, Lima, Peru

    Francisco Cuellar

Authors
  1. Gabriele Trovato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Loys De Saint Chamas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Masao Nishimura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Renato Paredes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Cesar Lucho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Alexander Huerta-Mercado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Francisco Cuellar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriele Trovato.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Trovato, G., De Saint Chamas, L., Nishimura, M. et al. Religion and Robots: Towards the Synthesis of Two Extremes. Int J of Soc Robotics 13, 539–556 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00553-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00553-8

Keywords

search

Navigation