Abstract
Today’s teens will most likely be the first generation to spend a lifetime living and interacting with both mechanical and social robots. Although human–robot interaction has been explored in children, adults, and seniors, examination of teen–robot interaction has been limited. In this paper, we provide evidence that teen–robot interaction is a unique area of inquiry and designing for teens is categorically different from other types of human–robot interaction. Using human-centered design, our team is developing a social robot to gather stress and mood data from teens in a public high school. To better understand teen–robot interaction, we conducted an interaction study in the wild to explore and capture teens’ interactions with a low-fidelity social robot prototype. Then, through group interviews we gathered data regarding their perceptions about social robots. Although we anticipated minimal engagement due to the low fidelity of our prototype, teens showed strong engagement and lengthy interactions. Additionally, teens expressed thoughtful articulations of how a social robot could be emotionally supportive. We conclude the paper by discussing future areas for consideration when designing for teen–robot interaction.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Davies C, Eynon R (2013) Teenagers and technology (adolescence and society). Taylor and Francis
Lenhart A (2015) Teens, social media & technology overview 2015. Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project, 2015. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/09/teens-social-media-technology-2015/. Accessed 10 Sept 2017
Spies Shapiro LA, Margolin G (2014) Growing up wired: social networking sites and adolescent psychosocial development. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 17(1):1–18
Fitton D, Little L, Bell BT (2016) Introduction: HCI reaches adolescence. In: Little L, Fitton D, Bell B, Toth N (eds) Perspectives on HCI research with teens. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–9
Kanda T, Sato R, Saiwaki N, Ishiguro H (2007) A two-month field trial in an elementary school for long-term human–robot interaction. IEEE Trans Robot 23(5):962–971
Kim ES et al (2013) Social robots as embedded reinforcers of social behavior in children with autism. J Autism Dev Disord 43(5):1038–1049
Robins B, Dautenhahn K, Te Boekhorst R, Billard A (2005) Robotic assistants in therapy and education of children with autism: can a small humanoid robot help encourage social interaction skills? Univ Access Inf Soc 4(2):105–120
Collins C, Duckworth D, Henkel Z, Wuisan S, Bethel CL (2015) Therabot™. In: Proceedings of the tenth annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction extended abstracts: HRI’15 extended abstracts, pp 307–307
Severinson-Eklundh K, Green A, Hüttenrauch H (2003) Social and collaborative aspects of interaction with a service robot. Robot Auton Syst 42:223–234
Sabelli AM, Kanda T, Hagita N (2011) A conversational robot in an elderly care center. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on human–robot interaction—HRI’11, p 37
Wada K, Shibata T (2007) Living with seal robots—its sociopsychological and physiological influences on the elderly at a care house. IEEE Trans Robot 23(5):972–980
Scassellati B, Admoni H, Matari M (2012) Robots for use in autism research. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 14:275–294
Robinson H, MacDonald B, Kerse N, Broadbent E (2013) The psychosocial effects of a companion robot: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc 14(9):661–667
Jøranson N, Pedersen I, Rokstad AMM, Ihlebæk C (2015) Effects on symptoms of agitation and depression in persons with dementia participating in robot-assisted activity: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc 16(10):867–873
American Psychological Association (2015) Stress in America: paying with our health. https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/stress/2014/stress-report.pdf. Accessed 21 Mar 2016
Nardi B, Francesconi G, Catena-Dell’Osso M, Bellantuono C (2013) Adolescent depression: clinical features and therapeutic strategies. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 17(11):1546–1551
American Psychological Association. (2014). Stress in America: Are teens adopting adults’ stress habits. Stress in America Surveys. http://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/stress/2013/stress-report.pdf
Young CC, Dietrich MS (2015) Stressful life events, worry, and rumination predict depressive and anxiety symptoms in young adolescents. J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs 28(1):35–42
Kolb B, Gibb R (2011) Brain plasticity and behaviour in the developing brain. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 20(4):265–276
Steinberg L (2014) Age of opportunity: lessons from the new science of adolescence. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
Zimmerman C (2000) The development of scientific reasoning skills. Dev Rev 20(1):99–149
Sanders RA (2013) Adolescent psychosocial, social, and cognitive development. Pediatr Rev 34(8):354–358 (quiz 358–359)
Zimmermann BJ, Cleary TJ (2006) Adolescents’ development of personal agency. Self-efficacy Beliefs Adolesc 5:45–69
McEwen BS, Morrison JH (2013) The brain on stress: vulnerability and plasticity of the prefrontal cortex over the life course. Neuron 79(1):16–29
Eiland L, Romeo RD (2013) Stress and the developing adolescent brain. Neuroscience 249(212):162–171
Henje-Blom E et al (2015) The neuroscience and context of adolescent depression. Acta Paediatr 105(4):358–365
Hamilton JL, Stange JP, Abramson LY, Alloy LB (2015) Stress and the development of cognitive vulnerabilities to depression explain sex differences in depressive symptoms during adolescence. Clin Psychol Sci J Assoc Psychol Sci 3(5):702–714
Leonard NR et al (2015) A multi-method exploratory study of stress, coping, and substance use among high school youth in private schools. Front Psychol 6:1028
Funke R, Eichler A, Distler J, Golub Y, Kratz O, Moll GH (2017) Stress system dysregulation in pediatric generalized anxiety disorder associated with comorbid depression. Stress Health 33:518–529
Patel V et al (2007) Mental health of young people: a global public-health challenge. Lancet 369(9569):1302–1313
Szabó M (2010) The short version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): factor structure in a young adolescent sample. J Adolesc 1(33):1–8
Scrimin S, Mason L, Moscardino U (2014) School-related stress and cognitive performance: a mood-induction study. Contemp Educ Psychol 39(4):359–368
Roozendaal B, McEwen BS, Chattarji S (2009) Stress, memory and the amygdala. Nat Rev Neurosci 10(6):423–433
O’Reilly E, McNeill KG, Mavor KI, Anderson K (2014) Looking beyond personal stressors: an examination of how academic stressors contribute to depression in Australian graduate medical students. Teach Learn Med 26(1):56–63
Vogel S, Schwabe L (2016) Learning and memory under stress: implications for the classroom. npj Sci Learn 1:16011
Cornwell P (2016) Schools create moments of calm for stressed-out students. Seattle Times, Seattle, 10-Dec-2016
Lenhart A (2015) Teens, social media & technology overview 2015. Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project, 2015
Little L, Fitton D, Bell BT, Toth N (2016) Perspectives on HCI research with teenagers. Springer, Berlin
Fitton D, Read JCC, Horton M (2013) The challenge of working with teens as participants in interaction design. In: CHI’13 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems—CHI EA’13, p 205
Swift-Spong K, Wen CKF, Spruijt-Metz D, Mataric MJ (2016) Comparing backstories of a socially assistive robot exercise buddy for adolescent youth. In: 2016 25th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN), pp 1013–1018
Liu EZ-FF (2010) Early adolescents’ perceptions of educational robots and learning of robotics. Br J Educ Technol 41(3):E44–E47
Sequeira J, Ferreira I (2014) The concept of [robot] in children and teens. Int J Signs Semiot Syst (IJSSS) 3(2):43–57
Bainbridge WA, Hart JW, Kim ES, Scassellati B (2011) The benefits of interactions with physically present robots over video-displayed agents. Int J Soc Robot 3(1):41–52
Martelaro N, Nneji VC, Ju W, Hinds P (2016) Tell me more: designing HRI to encourage more trust, disclosure, and companionship. In: ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, vol 2016, pp 181–188
Rose EJ, Björling EA (2017) Designing for engagement. In: Proceedings of the 35th ACM international conference on the design of communication—SIGDOC’17, pp 1–10
Lenhart A, Ling R, Campbell S, Purcell K (2010) Teens and mobile phones. Pew Internet Am Life Proj 20:1–94
Trapl ES et al (2005) Use of audio-enhanced personal digital assistants for school-based data collection. J Adolesc Health 37(4):296–305
Minnis AM, Padian NS (2001) Reliability of adolescents’ self-reported sexual behavior: a comparison of two diary methodologies. J Adolesc Health 28(5):394–403
Chung M, Pronobis A, Cakmak M, Fox D, Rao RPN (2015) Exploring the potential of information gathering robots. In: Proceedings of the tenth annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction extended abstracts, pp 29–30
Huang J, Lau T (2016) Design and evaluation of a rapid programming system for service robots. In: Proceedings of ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, pp 295–302
Fong T, Nourbakhsh I, Dautenhahn K (2003) A survey of socially interactive robots. Robot Auton Syst 42(3):143–166
Leite I, Martinho C, Paiva A (2013) Social robots for long-term interaction: a survey. Int J Soc Robot 5(2):291–308
Breazeal C (2011) Social robots for health applications. In: 2011 Annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, pp 5368–5371
Scassellati B (2007) How social robots will help us to diagnose, treat, and understand autism. In: Thrun S, Brooks R, Durrant-Whyte H (eds) Robotics research. Springer, Berlin, pp 552–563
Abdel-Salam S, Gunter WD (2014) Therapeutic engagement as a predictor of retention in adolescent therapeutic community treatment. J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse 23(1):49–57
Seed M, Juarez M, Alnatour R (2009) Improving recruitment and retention rates in preventive longitudinal research with adolescent mothers. J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs 22(3):150–153
Wood LJ, Dautenhahn K, Rainer A, Robins B, Lehmann H, Syrdal DS (2013) Robot-mediated interviews—how effective is a humanoid robot as a tool for interviewing young children? PLoS ONE 8(3):e59448
Runyan JD, Steinke EG (2015) Virtues, ecological momentary assessment/intervention and smartphone technology. Front Psychol 6:481
Dunton G, Dzubur E, Li M, Huh J, Intille S, McConnell R (2016) Momentary assessment of psychosocial stressors, context, and asthma symptoms in hispanic adolescents. Behav Modif 40(1–2):257–280
Khor AS, Gray KM, Reid SC, Melvin GA (2014) Feasibility and validity of ecological momentary assessment in adolescents with high-functioning autism and Asperger’s disorder. J Adolesc 37(1):37–46
Björling EA, Singh N (2016) Exploring temporal patterns of stress in adolescent girls with headache. Stress Health 33(1):69–79
Tan PZ et al (2012) Emotional reactivity and regulation in anxious and nonanxious youth: a cell-phone ecological momentary assessment study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 53(2):197–206
Heron K, Smyth, JM, Bergen-Cico D, Carey M, Ewart C, Maisto, S Newman L (2011) Ecological momentary intervention (EMI): incorporating mobile technology into a disordered eating treatment program for college women. ProQuest dissertations and theses
Pramana G, Parmanto B, Kendall PC, Silk JS (2014) The SmartCAT: an m-health platform for ecological momentary intervention in child anxiety treatment. Telemed e-Health 20(5):419–427
Björling EA, Rose EJ (2019) Participatory research principles in human-centered design: engaging teens in the co-design of a social robot. Multimodal Technol Interact 3(1):8
Brumby DP, Blandford A, Cox AL, Gould SJJ, Marshall P (2017) Understanding people. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems—CHI EA’17, pp 1170–1173
Wright P, McCarthy J (2008) Empathy and experience in HCI. In: Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual CHI conference on human factors in computing systems—CHI’08, p 637
Millen DR (2000) Rapid ethnography. In: Proceedings of the conference on designing interactive systems processes, practices, methods, and techniques—DIS’00, pp 280–286
Rose EJ, Björling EA (2017) Designing for engagement: using participatory design to develop a social robot to measure teen stress. In: Proceedings of 35th ACM international conference on the design of communication—SIGDOC’17, pp 1–10
Björling EA, Rose E, Ren R (2018) Teen–robot interaction: a pilot study of engagement with a low-fidelity prototype. In: Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction, pp 69–70
Giacomin J (2014) What is human centred design? Des J 17(4):606–623
Krippendorff K (2004) Intrinsic motivation and human-centered design. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 5(1):43–72
Maguire M (2001) Methods to support human-centred design. Int J Hum Comput Stud 55(4):587–634
Sabanovic S, Michalowski MP, Simmons R (2006) Robots in the wild: Observing human–robot social interaction outside the lab. In: International workshop on advanced motion control, vol 2006. AMC, pp 576–581
Chang WL, Sabanovic S, Huber L (2014) Observational study of naturalistic interactions with the socially assistive robot PARO in a nursing home. In: IEEE RO-MAN 2014—23rd IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication: human–robot co-existence: adaptive interfaces and systems for daily life, therapy, assistance and socially engaging interactions, pp 294–299
Forlizzi J (2007) How robotic products become social products. In: Proceeding of the ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction—HRI’07, p 129
Leite I, Castellano G, Pereira A, Martinho C, Paiva A (2012) Modelling empathic behaviour in a robotic game companion for children. In: Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction—HRI’12, p 367
Broadbent E et al (2012) Attitudes towards health-care robots in a retirement village. Australas J Ageing 31(2):115–120
Gould JD, Lewis C (1985) Designing for usability: key principles and what designers think. Commun ACM 28(3):300–311
Turns J, Ramey J (2006) Active and collaborative learning in the practice of research: credit-based directed credit-based directed research groups. Tech Commun 53175118(3):296–307
Larson J, Birge C, Huang Y-M, Sattler B, Turns J, Yellin JMH (2009) Society for technical communication directed research groups as a means of training students to become technica. Source Tech Commun 5695104(2):172–177
Fereday J, Muir-Cochrane E (2006) Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. Int J Qual Methods 5(1):80–92
Asada M (2015) Development of artificial empathy. Neurosci Res 90:41–50
Leite I, Castellano G, Pereira A, Martinho C, Paiva A (2014) Empathic robots for long-term interaction: evaluating social presence, engagement and perceived support in children. Int J Soc Robot 6(3):329–341
Breazeal CL (2002) Designing sociable robots. MIT Press, Cambridge
Beran TN, Ramirez-Serrano A, Kuzyk R, Fior M, Nugent S (2011) Understanding how children understand robots: perceived animism in childrobot interaction. Int J Hum Comput Stud 69(7–8):539–550
Duffy BR (2003) Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robot Auton Syst 42(3–4):177–190
Asada M (2014) Towards artificial empathy. Int J Soc Robot 7(1):19–33
Konrath SH, O’brien EH, Hsing C (2011) Changes in dispositional empathy in american college students over time: a meta-analysis. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 15(2):180–198
McGivern RF, Andersen J, Byrd D, Mutter KL, Reilly J (2002) Cognitive efficiency on a match to sample task decreases at the onset of puberty in children. Brain Cognit 50(1):73–89
Wiklund M, Malmgren-Olsson E-B, Ohman A, Bergström E, Fjellman-Wiklund A (2012) Subjective health complaints in older adolescents are related to perceived stress, anxiety and gender—a cross-sectional school study in Northern Sweden. BMC Public Health 12:993
Kidger J, Donovan JL, Biddle L, Campbell R, Gunnell D (2009) Supporting adolescent emotional health in schools: a mixed methods study of student and staff views in England. BMC Public Health 9(1):403
Kann L, Brener ND, Warren CW, Collins JL, Giovino GA (2002) An assessment of the effect of data collection setting on the prevalence of health risk behaviors among adolescents. J Adolesc Health 31(4):327–335
Fitzpatrick KK, Darcy A, Vierhile M (2017) Delivering cognitive behavior therapy to young adults with symptoms of depression and anxiety using a fully automated conversational agent (Woebot): a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Ment Health 4(2):e19
Turkle S, Taggart W, Kidd CD, Dasté O (2006) Relational artifacts with children and elders: the complexities of cybercompanionship. Connect Sci 18(4):347–361
Sung J, Christensen HI, Grinter RE (2009) Robots in the wild: understanding long-term use. In: 2009 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction (HRI), pp 45–52
Fernaeus Y, Håkansson M, Jacobsson M, Ljungblad S (2010) How do you play with a robotic toy animal? In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on interaction design and children—IDC’10, p 39
Gockley R et al (2005) Designing robots for long-term social interaction. In: 2005 IEEE/rsj international conference on intelligent robots and systems, pp 2199–2204
Tanaka F, Suzuki H (2004, September) Dance interaction with QRIO: a case study for non-boring interaction by using an entrainment ensemble model. In: RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication (IEEE Catalog No. 04TH8759). IEEE, pp 419–424
Acknowledgements
Thank you to all the teens who participated in our research and to our wonderful graduate and undergraduate students who engaged in Project EMAR for year 1.
Funding
This study was funded in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. NRI-1734100.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Björling, E.A., Rose, E., Davidson, A. et al. Can We Keep Him Forever? Teens’ Engagement and Desire for Emotional Connection with a Social Robot. Int J of Soc Robotics 12, 65–77 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00539-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00539-6