Abstract
This paper argues that our understanding of many human-robot relations can be enhanced by comparisons with human-animal relations and by a phenomenological approach which highlights the significance of how robots appear to humans. Some potential gains of this approach are explored by discussing the concept of alterity, diversity and change in human-robot relations, Heidegger’s claim that animals are ‘poor in world’, and the issue of robot-animal relations. These philosophical reflections result in a perspective on human-robot relations that may guide robot design and inspire more empirical human-robot relations research that is sensitive to how robots appear to humans in different contexts at different times.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Levy D (2007) Love and sex with robots: the evolution of human-robot relationships. Harper, New York
Saldien J, Goris K, Vanderborght B, Vanderfaeillie J, Lefeber D (2010) Expressing emotions with the social robot Probo. Int J Soc Robot. Available online: doi:10.1007/s12369-010-0067-6
Mori M (1970) Bukimi no tani (The uncanny valley). (Trans KF MacDorman & T Minato). Energy 7(4):33–35
Ihde D (1990) Technology and the lifeworld. Indiana University Press, Bloomington/Minneapolis
Selinger E (ed) (2006) Postphenomenology: a critical companion to Ihde. SUNY Press, Albany, p 5
Ihde D (1990) Technology and the lifeworld, pp 97–108
Ramey CH (2005) “For the sake of others”: the personal ethics of human-android interaction. In: Proceedings of the android science workshop 2005, cognitive science society. Retrieved May 7, 2009. http://www.androidscience.com/proceedings2005/RameyCogSci2005AS.pdf
Olafson FA (1995) What is a human being? A heideggerian view. Cambridge University Press, New York
Turkle S (1984) The second self: computers and the human spirit. Simon and Schuster, New York
Bartneck C, Kanda T, Mubin O, Al Mahmud A (2009) Does the design of a robot influence its animacy and perceived intelligence? Int J Soc Robot 1:195–204
Breazeal C (2002) Designing sociable robots. MIT Press, Cambridge
Breazeal C (2003) Emotion and sociable humanoid robots. Int J Hum-Comput Stud 59(1–2):119–155
Breazeal C (2003) Toward sociable robots. Robot Auton Syst 42:167–175
Coeckelbergh M (2009) Personal robots, appearance, and the good: a methodological reflection on roboethics. Int J Soc Robot 1(3):217–221
Reeves B, Nass CI (1996) The media equation: how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. CSLI Publications, Stanford. Cambridge University Press, New York
Ishiguro H (2006) The uncanny advantage of using androids in cognitive and social science research. Interact Stud 7(3):297–333
Ishiguro H (2006) Android science: conscious and subconscious recognition. Connect Sci 18(4):319–332
Mori M (1970) Bukimi no tani (The uncanny valley)
MacDorman KF (2005) Androids as an experimental apparatus: why is there an uncanny valley and can we exploit it? In: Proceedings of the android science workshop 2005, cognitive science society. Retrieved May 7, 2009. http://www.androidscience.com/proceedings2005/MacDormanCogSci2005AS.pdf
Waiblinger W (2009) Human-animal relations. In: Jensen P (ed) The ethology of domestic animals, 2nd edn. CAB, Wallingford/Cambridge, p 102
Harbers H (2002) Weak ethics, strong feelings. In: Keulartz J, Korthals M, Schermer M, Swierstra T (eds) Pragmatist ethics for a technological culture. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 143–149
Heidegger M (1977) The question concerning technology. In: The question concerning technology and other essays (Trans Lovitt W). Harper and Row, New York. 1953
Waiblinger W (2009) Human-animal relations, p 104
Lotz C, Painter C (eds) (2007) Phenomenology and the non-human animal: at the limits of experience. Springer, Berlin, pp 13–28
Heidegger M (1995) The fundamental concepts of metaphysics (Trans McNeill W, Walker N). Indiana University Press, Bloomington, p 195 (1929/1930)
Kuperus G (2007) Attunement, deprivation, and drive: Heidegger and animality. In: Lotz C, Painter C (eds) Phenomenology and the non-human animal: at the limits of experience. Springer, Berlin, pp 13–28
Sung JY, Grinter RE, Christensen HI (2010) Domestic robot ecology. Int J Soc Robot. Available online: doi:10.1007/s12369-010-0065-8
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
A first version of this paper has been presented at the 2nd International Conference on Human-Robot Personal Relations, Tilburg, June 11–12, 2009.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Coeckelbergh, M. Humans, Animals, and Robots: A Phenomenological Approach to Human-Robot Relations. Int J of Soc Robotics 3, 197–204 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-010-0075-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-010-0075-6