Gender Representation and Humanoid Robots Designed for Domestic Use

Abstract

Humanoid robots’ appearance and behavior provide social cues about their purpose and abilities. However, little is known about how a robot’s gender representation will affect users in everyday home use scenarios. This paper presents the results of a study exploring people’s expectations of humanoid robots, or androids, designed for home use. Results of this study demonstrated participants’ willingness to attribute human roles and tasks to an android, although they did not indicate an overall preference for the robot as a social actor. In addition, following the viewing of video stimulus featuring human-robot interactions, robot gender issues surfaced during open-ended interviews.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    Boyatzis R (1998) Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3:77–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Carpenter J, Eliot M, Schultheis D (2006) Machine or friend: Understanding users’ preferences for and expectations of a humanoid robot companion. In: Proceedings of 2006 design emotion conference, Gothenburg, Sweden, 27–29 September 2006

  4. 4.

    Dautenhahn K, Woods S, Kaouri C, Walters M, Koay KL, Werry I (2005) What is a robot companion, friend, assistant or butler? In: Proceedings of IEEE IROS, Edmonton, Canada, pp 1488–1493

  5. 5.

    Goffman E (1959) The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Haraway DJ (1991) Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Levy D (2007) Intimate relationships with artificial partners. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Universiteit Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands

  8. 8.

    Powers A, Kramer ADI, Lim S, Kuo J, Lee S, Kiesler S (2005) Eliciting information from people with a gendered humanoid robot. In: Proceedings of 2005 IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN 2005)

  9. 9.

    Reeves B, Nass C (1996) The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ryan GW, Bernard HR (2003) Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods 15(1):85–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Van Zoonen L (2002) Gendering the Internet: claims, controversies, and culture. Eur J Commun 17:5–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julie Carpenter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carpenter, J., Davis, J.M., Erwin-Stewart, N. et al. Gender Representation and Humanoid Robots Designed for Domestic Use. Int J of Soc Robotics 1, 261 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-009-0016-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Android
  • Design
  • Expectations
  • Gender
  • Human
  • Humanoid
  • Human-robot interaction
  • Interaction
  • Robot
  • Social
  • Stereotypes