Does the Design of a Robot Influence Its Animacy and Perceived Intelligence?
- 1.6k Downloads
Robots exhibit life-like behavior by performing intelligent actions. To enhance human-robot interaction it is necessary to investigate and understand how end-users perceive such animate behavior. In this paper, we report an experiment to investigate how people perceived different designs of robot embodiments in terms of animacy and intelligence. iCat and Robovie II were used as the two embodiments in this experiment. We conducted a between-subject experiment where robot type was the independent variable, and perceived animacy and intelligence of the robot were the dependent variables. Our findings suggest that a robot’s perceived intelligence is significantly correlated with animacy. The correlation between the intelligence and the animacy of a robot was observed to be stronger in the case of the iCat embodiment. Our results also indicate that the more animated the face of the robot, the more likely it is to attract the attention of a user. We also discuss the possible and probable explanations of the results obtained.
KeywordsRobot Intelligence Animacy Embodiment Perception
- 1.Oxford University Press (1999) Animate. The Oxford American dictionary of current English. Oxford University Press, Oxford Google Scholar
- 4.Holland O, McFarland D (2001) Artificial ethology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York Google Scholar
- 6.Halloy J, Sempo G, Caprari G, Rivault C, Asadpour M, Tache F, Said I, Durier V, Canonge S, Ame JM, Detrain C, Correll N, Martinoli A, Mondada F, Siegwart R, Deneubourg JL (2007) Social integration of robots into groups of cockroaches to control self-organized choices. Science 318:1155–1158 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Sony (1999) Aibo. http://www.aibo.com
- 12.Melson GF, Kahn PH, Beck AM, Friedman B, Roberts T, Garrett E (2005) Robots as dogs?: children’s interactions with the robotic dog AIBO and a live Australian shepherd. In: CHI ’05 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, Portland, OR, USA, 2005. ACM, New York, pp 1649–1652 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Turkle S (1998) Cyborg babies and cy-dough-plasm: ideas about life in the culture of simulation. In: Davis-Floyd R, Dumit J (eds) Cyborg babies: from techno-sex to techno-tots. Routledge, New York, pp 317–329 Google Scholar
- 14.Kahn P, Ishiguro H, Friedman B, Kanda T (2006) What is a human?—Toward psychological benchmarks in the field of human-robot interaction. In: The 15th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, ROMAN, Salt Lake City, 2006. IEEE, New York, pp 364–371 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Nass C, Reeves B (1996) The media equation. SLI publications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
- 19.Blythe P, Miller GF, Todd PM (1999) How motion reveals intention: Categorizing social interactions. In: Gigerenzer G, Todd P (eds) Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 257–285 Google Scholar
- 25.McAleer P, Mazzarino B, Volpe G, Camurri A, Paterson H, Smith K, Pollick FE (2004) Perceiving animacy and arousal in transformed displays of human interaction. In: 2nd international symposium on measurement, analysis and modeling of human functions, 1st Mediterranean conference on measurement, Genova, 2004 Google Scholar
- 26.Lee KM, Park N, Song H (2005) Can a robot be perceived as a developing creature? Hum Commun Res 31:538–563 Google Scholar
- 27.Milgram S (1974) Obedience to authority. Tavistock, London Google Scholar
- 29.Warner RM, Sugarman DB (1996) Attributes of personality based on physical appearance, speech, and handwriting. J Personal Soc Psychol 50:792–799 Google Scholar
- 32.Bartneck C, Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2009) My robotic Doppelgänger—a critical look at the uncanny valley theory. Submitted to the 18th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN), 2009 Google Scholar
- 38.Honda (2002) Asimo. http://www.honda.co.jp/ASIMO/
- 39.NEC (2001) PaPeRo. http://www.incx.nec.co.jp/robot/
- 40.Breemen A, Yan X, Meerbeek B (2005) iCat: an animated user-interface robot with personality. In: Fourth international conference on autonomous agents & multi agent systems, Utrecht, 2005 Google Scholar
- 41.DiSalvo CF, Gemperle F, Forlizzi J, Kiesler S (2002) All robots are not created equal: the design and perception of humanoid robot heads. Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques. ACM Press, London, pp 321–326 Google Scholar
Open AccessThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.