Skip to main content

Toward Acceptable Domestic Robots: Applying Insights from Social Psychology

Abstract

Social psychology offers a perspective on the acceptance and adoption of technology that is not often considered in technical circles. In this paper, we discuss several adoption-of-technology models with respect to the acceptance of domestic robots: we examine social-psychology literature and apply it directly to human-robot interaction. We raise key points that we feel will be pivotal to how domestic users respond to robots, and provide a set of guidelines that roboticists and designers of robotic interfaces can use to consider and analyze their designs. Ultimately, understanding how users respond to robots and the reasons behind their responses will enable designers to creating domestic robots that are accepted into homes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50:179–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1980) Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  3. Asimov I (1968) Robot. Grafton Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bartneck C, van der Hoek M, Mubin O et al. (2007) Daisy, “Daisy, give me your answer do!”: switching off a robot. In: Proc ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conf hum-robot interact, 2007, HRI ’07, Washington, DC, USA, Mar 10–12, 2007. ACM Press, New York, pp 217–222

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Bartneck C, Verbunt M, Mubin O et al. (2007) To kill a mockingbird robot. In: Proc ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conf hum-robot interact, 2007, HRI ’07, Washington, DC, USA, Mar 10–12, 2007. ACM Press, New York, pp 81–87

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Bijker W (1993) Do not despair: there is life after constructivism. Sci Technol Hum Values 18(4):113–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Breazeal C (2001) Affective interaction between humans and robots. In: Proc Eur conf adv artif life, 2001. ECAL ’01, Prague, Czech Republic, Sep 10–14 2001. Springer, London, pp 582–291

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Breazeal CL (2002) Designing sociable robots. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  9. Breazeal CL (2003) Emotion and sociable humanoid robots. Int J Hum-Comput Stud 59(1–2):119–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brenton H, Gilles M, Ballin D et al (2005) The uncanny valley: does it exist? In: Proc HCI annu conf: workshop on human-animated character interaction, Edinburgh, 2005

  11. Burnkrant R, Cousineau A (1975) Informational and normative social influence in buyer behavior. J Consum Res 206–215

  12. Callon M (1987) Society in the making: the study of technology as a tool for sociological analysis. In: Bikjer WE, Hughes TP, Pinch T (eds) The social construction of technological systems. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  13. Capek K (1970) Rossum’s universal robots. Pocket Books, New York. Originally appeared as play, 1920

    Google Scholar 

  14. Clark J, McLoughlin I, Rose H et al. (1988) The process of technological change: new technology and social choice in the workplace. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm Sci Q 128–152

  16. Compeau D, Higgins CA (1995) Applications of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills. Inf Syst Res 6(2):118–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cornwall J (1977) Modern capitalism: its growth and transformation. Martin Robertson, London

    Google Scholar 

  18. Davis FD (1986) A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. PhD thesis, Sloan School of Management, MIT

  19. Dholakia RR (2006) Gender and it in the household: evolving patterns of Internet use in the United States. Inf Soc 22(4):231–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dosi G (1982) Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Res Policy 11(3):147–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fleck J (1984) The adoption of robots in industry. Phys Technol 15(1):4–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Forlizzi J, DiSalvo C (2006) Service robots in the domestic environment: a study of the roomba vacuum in the home. In: Proc ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conf hum-robot interact, 2006, HRI ’06, Salt Lake City, USA, Mar 2–4, 2006. ACM Press, New York, pp 258–256

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Friedman B, Peter H, Kahn J, Hagman J (2003) Hardware companions?—what online AIBO discussion forums reveal about the human-robotic relationship. In: ACM conf hum factors comput syst, 2003, CHI ’03, Fort Lauderdale, USA, Apr 5–10, 2003. ACM Press, New York, pp 273–280

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Fussell SR, Kiesler S, Setlock LD et al. (2008) How people anthropomorphize robots. In: Proc ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conf hum-robot interact, 2008, HRI ’08, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Mar 12–15, 2008. ACM Press, New York, pp 145–152

    Google Scholar 

  25. Garreau J (2007). Bots on the ground. In: Washington Post, available via WWW, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/05/AR2007050501009_pf.html, Visited April 9th, 2008

  26. Geller T (2008) Overcoming the uncanny valley. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 28:11–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hamill L (2006) Controlling smart devices in the home. Inf Soc 22(4):241–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hamill L, Harper R (2006) Talking intelligence: a historical and conceptual exploration of speech-based human-machine interaction in smart homes. In: Proc int symp intell environ, 2006, ISIE ’06, Cambridge, UK, Apr 5–7, 2006. MSR Press, Cambridge, pp 121–128

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hanson D, Olney A, Pereira IA et al. (2005) Upending the uncanny valley. In: Proc natl conf artif intell, 2005, AAAI ’05, Pittsburgh, USA, Jul 9–13, 2005. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, pp 1728–1729

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kiesler S, Hinds P (2004) Introduction to this special issue on human-robot interaction. Hum-Comput Interact 19(1/2):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kirsh D (2006) Explaining artifact evolution. In: Presentation at the knowledge conference, Irvine, April 22, 2006. University of California Press, Irvine

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lancaster K (1966) A new approach to consumer theory. J Political Econ 74(2):132–157

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Levy D (2007) Love and sex with robots: the evolution of human-robot relationships. Harper, New York

    Google Scholar 

  34. MacDorman KF, Minato T, Shimada M et al. (2005) Assessing human likeness by eye contact in an android testbed. In: Proc annu meet cogn sci soc, 2005, CogSci ’05, Stresa, Italy, Jul 21–23, 2005. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mansfield E (1989) The diffusion of industrial robots in Japan and the United States. Res Policy 18:183–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mathieson K (1991) Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Inf Syst Res 2(3):173–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. McMeekin A, Green K, Tomlinson M et al. (2002) Innovation by demand: an interdisciplinary approach to the study of demand and its role in innovation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  38. Michalowski MP, Sabanovic S, Kozima H (2007) A dancing robot for rhythmic social interaction. In: Proc ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conf hum-robot interact, 2007, HRI ’07, Washington, DC, USA, Mar 10–12, 2007. ACM Press, New York, pp 89–96

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Minato T, Shimada M, Ishiguro H et al. (2004) Development of an android for studying human-robot interaction. In: Proc innov appl artif intell, int conf ind eng appl artif intell expert syst 2004, IEA/AIE ’04, Ottawa, Canada, May 17–20, 2004. ACM Press, New York, pp 424–434

    Google Scholar 

  40. Minato T, Yoshikawa Y, Noda T et al. (2007) Cb2: a child robot with biomimetic body for cognitive developmental robotics. In: Proc IEEE-RAS/RSJ int conf hum robot, 2007, Humanoids ’07, Pittsburgh, USA, Nov 29–Dec 1, 2007. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos

    Google Scholar 

  41. Montalvo C (2002) Environmental policy and technological innovation: why do firms adopt or reject new technologies? Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mori M (1970) Bukimi no tani: the uncanny valley. Energy 7(4):33–35 (in Japanese). English translation provided at CogSci ’05 workshop: toward social mechanisms of android science, views of the Uncanny Valley. WWW, http://www.androidscience.com/theuncannyvalley/proceedings2005/uncannyvalley.html. Visited Feb 9th, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  43. Norman D (2004) Emotional design: why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  44. Pavlov IP (1927) Conditioned reflexes: an investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex. Oxford University Press, London. Translated and edited by GV Anrep

    Google Scholar 

  45. Pinch TJ, Bijker WE (1987) The social construction of technological systems. In: The social construction of facts and artifacts. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 17–50

    Google Scholar 

  46. Rogers EM (1995) Diffusion of innovations. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  47. Schmookler J (1966) Invention and economic growth. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  48. Schumpeter JA (1912) Die Theorie der Wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Duncker & Humblot, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  49. Scitovsky T (1976) The joyless economy: an inquiry into human satisfaction and consumer dissatisfaction. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  50. Setterfield M (2002) The economics of demand-lef growth: challenging the supply-side vision of the long run. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  51. Silverstone R (1991) Beneath the bottom line: households and information and communication technologies in an age of the consumer. PICT Policy Res Pap 17. Economic and Social Research Council, Swindon

  52. Silverstone R, Morley D (1990) Families and their technologies: two ethnographic portraits. In: Household choices. Futures Publications, London, pp 74–83

    Google Scholar 

  53. Steiner CJ (1995) A philosophy for innovation: the role of unconventional individuals in innovation success. J Prod Innov Manag 12:431–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Stoneman P (1976) Technological diffusion and the computer revolution: the UK experience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  55. Swann GMP (2001) The demand for distinction and the evolution of the prestige car. J Evol Econ 11:59–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Venkatesh A (2006) Introduction to the special issue on “ICT in everyday life: home and personal environments”. Inf Soc 22(4):191–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Venkatesh A, Brown SA (2001) A longitudinal investigation of personal computers in homes: adoption determinants and emerging challenges. MIS Q 25(1):71–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Venkatesh V, Davis FD (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag Sci 46(2):186–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Von Hippel E (2005) Democratizing innovation. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  60. Walters ML, Syrdal DS, Dautenhahn K et al. (2008) Avoiding the uncanny valley: robot appearance, personality and consistency of behavior in an attention-seeking home scenario for a robot companion. Auton Robot 24(2):159–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Williams R, Edge D (1996) The social shaping of technology. Res Policy 25(6):865–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Winner L (1987) Do artifacts have politics?. In: The whale and the reactor: a search for limits in an age of high technology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 19–39

    Google Scholar 

  63. Young JE, Xin M, Sharlin E (2007) Robot expressionism through cartooning. In: Proc ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conf hum-robot interact, 2007, HRI ’07, Washington, DC, USA, Mar 10–12, 2007. ACM Press, New York, pp 309–316

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  64. Zoonen L v (2002) Gendering the internet, claims, controversies and cultures. Eur J Commun 17(1):5–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James E. Young.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Young, J.E., Hawkins, R., Sharlin, E. et al. Toward Acceptable Domestic Robots: Applying Insights from Social Psychology. Int J of Soc Robotics 1, 95–108 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-008-0006-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-008-0006-y

Keywords

  • Models and principles
  • User/machine systems
  • Software psychology