Skip to main content
Log in

Frictional systems subjected to oscillating loads

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Solid and Structural Mechanics

Abstract

If a discrete elastic system with frictional interfaces is subjected to periodic loading, the eventual steady-state response may depend on the initial condition or an initial transient phase of the loading history. In cases where shakedown is possible, it is known that it will occur for all initial conditions if there is no coupling between slip displacements and normal contact tractions, but that when coupling is present, counter-examples can be developed where the steady-state depends on the initial conditions. In this paper, we explore the conjecture that this is a special case of a more general theorem that the time-varying terms in the steady-state solution for an uncoupled system are always independent of initial conditions. In such problems, the ‘memory’ of previous events can only be stored in the slip displacements at nodes that are presently strictly within the friction cone. If all the nodes slip at some point in the cycle, this memory must be continually exchanged between nodes, with a consequent degradation, or loss of memory, resulting in an asymptotic approach to a unique steady state. This behaviour is illustrated using a simple two-node example. When there exists a set of ‘permanently stuck nodes’, these constitute a repository for the system memory, but in uncoupled problems the displacements at these nodes have no effect on the normal tractions at the slipping nodes and hence on the time-varying terms in the solution These arguments are illustrated in the context of two examples: a random distribution of frictional microcracks in a block loaded in plane strain and a generalized Hertzian contact problem with friction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Acary V, Jean M (2000) Numerical modeling of three dimensional divided structures by the non smooth contact dynamics method: Application to masonry structures. In: Topping BHV (eds) The Fifth International Conference on Computational Structures Technology. Leuven, Belgium, pp 211–222

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ahn YJ (2010) Discontinuity of quasi-static solution in the two-node Coulomb frictional system. Int J Solids Struct 47:2866–2871

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahn YJ, Bertocchi E, Barber JR (2008) Shakedown of coupled two-dimensional discrete frictional systems. J Mech Phys Solids 56:3433–3440

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Barber JR, Davies M, Hills DA (2011) Frictional elastic contact with periodic loading. Int J Solids Struct 48:2041–2047

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barber JR, Hild P (2006) On wedged configurations with Coulomb friction. In: Wriggers P, Nackenhorst U (eds) Analysis and simulation of contact problems. Springer, Berlin, pp 205–213

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Berczynski S, Gutowski P (2006) Identification of the dynamic models of machine tool supporting systems. Part I: An algorithm of the method. J Vib Control 12:257–277

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Bureau L, Caroli C, Baumberger T (2003) Elasticity and onset of frictional dissipation at a non-sliding multi-contact interface. Proc Roy Soc (London) A459:2787–2805

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Cattaneo C (1938) Sul contatto di due corpi elastici: distribuzione locale degli sforzi. Rendiconti dell’Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei 27:342–348, 434–436, 474–478. (In Italian)

  9. Cho H, Barber JR (1998) Dynamic behavior and stability of simple frictional systems. Math Comp Model 28:37–53

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Churchman CM, Hills DA (2006) General results for complete contacts subject to oscillatory shear. J Mech Phys Solids 54:1186–1205

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Ciavarella M (1998) The generalized Cattaneo partial slip plane contact problem. I-Theory, II-Examples. Int J Solids Struct 35:2349–2378

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Cross R (2005) Bounce of a spinning ball near normal incidence. Am J Phys 73:914–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Di Renzo A, Di Maio FP (2005) An improved integral non-linear model for the contact of particles in distinct element simulations. Chem Eng Sci 60:1303–1312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dong H, Moys MH (2006) Experimental study of oblique impacts with initial spin. Powder Tech 161:22–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hefner BT (2004) The kinematics of a superball bouncing between two vertical surfaces. Am J Phys 72:875–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hills DA, Nowell D, Sackfield A (1993) Mechanics of elastic contact. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jäger J (1998) A new principle in contact mechanics. ASME J Tribol 120:677–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jang YH, Barber JR (2011) Frictional energy dissipation in materials containing cracks. J Mech Phys Solids 59:583–594

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jean M (1995) Frictional contact in collections of rigid and deformable bodies: numerical simulation of geomaterials. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  20. Johnson KL (1985) Contact mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Kachanov M (1987) Elastic solids with many cracks: a simple method of analysis. Int J Solids Struct 23:23–43

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Klarbring A (1990) Examples of non-uniqueness and non-existence of solutions to quasi-static contact problems with friction. Ing-Arch 60:529–541

    Google Scholar 

  23. Klarbring A (2000) Contact friction discrete mechanical structures and discrete frictional systems. In: Wriggers P, Panagiotopoulos P (eds) New developments in contact problems. Springer, Berlin, pp 55–100

    Google Scholar 

  24. Klarbring A, Ciavarella M, Barber JR (2007) Shakedown in elastic contact problems with Coulomb friction. Int J Solids Struct 44:8355–8365

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Koh KH, Griffin JH, Filippi S, Akay A (2005) Characterization of turbine blade friction dampers. ASME J Eng Gas Turbines Power 127:856–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Konstandopoulos AG (2006) Particle sticking/rebound criteria at oblique impact. J Aerosol Sci 37:292–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kremmer M, Favier JF (2001) A method for representing boundaries in discrete element modelling – part I: Geometry and contact detection. Int J Num Meth Eng 51:1407–1421

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Law SS, Wu ZM, Chan SL (2006) Analytical model of a slotted bolted connection element and its behaviour under dynamic load. J Sound Vib 292:777–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lovrich NR, Neu RW (2006) Effect of mean stress on fretting fatigue of Ti-6Al-4V on Ti-6Al-4V. Fatigue Fract Eng Matls Struct 29:41–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Melan E (1936) Theorie statisch unbestimmter Systeme aus ideal-plastichem Baustoff. Sitzungsber. d.Akad. d. Wiss., Wien 2A (145):195–218 (In German)

  31. Mindlin RD (1949) Compliance of elastic bodies in contact. ASME J Appl Mech 16:259–268

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Murthy H, Harish G, Farris TN (2004) Efficient modeling of fretting of blade/disk contacts including load history effects. ASME J Tribol 126:56–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Nowell D, Dini D, Hills DA (2006) Recent developments in the understanding of fretting fatigue. Eng Fract Mech 73:207–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Popp K, Panning L, Sextro W (2003) Vibration damping by friction forces: theory and applications. J Vib Control 9:419–448

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Lapusta N, Rice JR, Ben-Zion Y, Zheng G (2000) Elastodynamic analysis for slow tectonic loading with spontaneous rupture episodes on faults with rate- and state-dependent friction. J Geophys Res 105:23765–23789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Renouf M, Dubois F, Alart P (2004) A parallel version of the non smooth contact dynamics algorithm applied to the simulation of granular media. J Comput Appl Math 168:375–380

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Stronge WJ, James R, Ravani B (2001) Oblique impact with friction and tangential compliance. Phil Trans Roy Soc (London) A359:2447–2465

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Ueda J, Ikeda A, Ogasawara T (2005) Grip-force control of an elastic object by vision-based slip-margin feedback during the incipient slip. IEEE Trans Robotics 21:1139–1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Walsh JB (2003) A theoretical analysis of sliding of rough surfaces. J Geophys Res–Solid Earth 108:Art. No. 2385

  40. Zhang HP, Makse HA (2005) Jamming transition in emulsions and granular materials. Phys Rev E 72:Art. No. 011301

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper draws on work performed in collaboration with Youngju Ahn, Enrico Bertocchi, Hanbum Cho, Michele Ciavarella, Matthew Davies, Daniele Dini, David Hills, Yong Hoon Jang, Anders Klarbring, Mehdi Movassaghi, and Andrea Spagnioli.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. R. Barber.

Additional information

The author dedicates this paper to Michel Jean on the occasion of his 70th birthday.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barber, J.R. Frictional systems subjected to oscillating loads. Ann. Solid Struct. Mech. 2, 45–55 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12356-011-0017-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12356-011-0017-5

Keywords

Navigation