Skip to main content
Log in

Water Productivity of Sugarcane + Summer Moong Intercropping System Under Subsurface Drip Irrigation and Straw Mulching

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Sugar Tech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sugarcane is a potential crop to replace the predominant rice–wheat cropping system of north India which is causing a gradual depletion of the groundwater table. However, sugarcane has a high water demand during the summer months. In comparison of conventional check basin method of irrigation, the micro-irrigation is a viable option to save water. Moreover, intercropping of summer moong in sugarcane increases the income and profitability of the farmers. Therefore, the present study was conducted to investigate the effects of intercropping of summer moong (Vigna radiata), mulching and subsurface drip irrigation on water productivity and profitability at Punjab Agricultural University, Regional Research Station, Faridkot during 2019–2020 (plant) and 2020–2021 (ratoon). Subsurface drip irrigation at 100% CPE (Cumulative Pan Evaporation) gave higher summer moong seed yield (0.52 and 0.51 t ha−1), cane yield (83.4 and 85.7 t ha−1), and cane equivalent yield (95.3 and 97.1 t ha−1), respectively, during 2019–2020 and 2020–2021 which was at par with 80% CPE and significantly better than 60% CPE. Intercropping 3 rows of summer moong produced higher summer moong seed yield, cane yield and cane equivalent yield than 2 rows. Mulching @ 6 t ha−1 produced significantly higher cane yield and cane equivalent yield over no mulching. Subsurface drip irrigation at 100% and 80% CPE saved water by 25% and 37.5%, respectively, than check basin method of irrigation. Therefore, subsurface drip irrigation either at 80 or 100% CPE having 3 rows of summer moong with mulching is recommended as the best management practice for sustainable yield and water saving.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous. 2020. Area, production and yield of principal crops. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture, pp 82–83.

  • Arya, R.L., and J.P. Sharma. 1994. Effect of irrigation and anti-transpirant and growth-regulators on summer greengram (Phaseolusradiatus). Indian Journal of Agronomy 39: 31–33.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ayars, J.E., C.J. Phene, R.B. Hutmacher, K.R. Davis, R.A. Schoneman, S.S. Vail, and R.M. Mead. 1999. Subsurface drip irrigation of row crops: A review of 15 years of research at the Water Management Research Laboratory. Agricultural Water Management 42: 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brar, S.K., S.S. Mahal, A.S. Brar, K.K. Vashist, N. Sharma, and G.S. Buttar. 2012. Transplanting time and seedling age affect water productivity, rice yield and quality in north-west India. Agricultural Water Management 115: 217–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chavan, V., S. Kachare, and P. Lawate. 2014. Effect of irrigation scheduling and mulches on summer green gram (Vignaradiata L. Wilczek). Trends in Bioscience 7: 3229–3231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geetha, P., K. Sivaraman, A.S. Tayade, and R. Dhanapalm. 2015. Sugarcane based intercropping system and its effect on cane yield. Journal of Sugarcane Research 5: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ines, A.V.M., K. Honda, A. Das Gupta, P. Droogers, and R.S. Clemente. 2006. Combining remote sensing-simulation modeling and genetic algorithm optimization to explore water management options in irrigated agriculture. Agricultural Water Management 83: 221–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaur, A., and A.S. Brar. 2016. Influence of mulching and irrigation scheduling on productivity and water use of turmeric in north western India. Irrigation Science 34: 261–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaushal, A., and S. Garg. 2012. Water use efficiency of sugarcane under different plantation methods. Journal of Progressive Agriculture 12: 324–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S., G. Chand, D. Mandal, A. Kumar, and S. Kumar. 2015. Effect of trash mulching on quantitative and qualitative parameters of sugarcane. Ecology, Environment and Conservation 21: 141–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao, Q., G. Wei, G. Chen, B. Liu, D. Haung, and Y.R. Li. 2014. Effect of trash addition to the soil on microbial communities and physico-chemical properties of soils and growth of sugarcane plants. Sugar Tech 1: 400–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahesh, R., N.A. Raja, and H.A. Archana. 2016. Performance of surface and subsurface drip fertigation on yield and water use efficiency of sugarcane. 2nd World Irrigation Forum 6–8 November 2016, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

  • Mishra, S.K., V. Kaur, and K. Singh. 2021. Evaluation of DSSATCROPGRO cottonmodel tosimulate phenology, growthand seedcottonyield in north-westernndia. Agronomy Journal 113 (5): 3975–3990. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel, A. P., D.B. Patel, M.M. Chaudhary, P.N. Parmar, and H.K. Patel. 2016. Influence of irrigation scheduling based on IW: CPE ratio and levels of sulphur on growth and yield of rabi greengram [Vigna radiata (L.) Mills]. Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology 10: 20-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, L.S., I. Cordery, and I. Iacovides. 2012. Improved indicators of water use performance and productivity for sustainable water conservation and saving. Agricultural Water Management 108: 39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, C., S. Pasquale, and F. Karajeh. 2017. “Does improved irrigation technology save water” A review of the evidence. Discussion Paper on Irrigation and Sustainable Water Resources Management in the Near East and North Africa. Food and Agriculture Organization of The United Nations, Cairo.

  • Pires, R.C.M., E.A.A. Barbosa, F.B. Arruda, E. Sakai, and T.J.A. Silva. 2014. Effects of Subsurface Drip Irrigation and Different Planting Arrangements on the Yields and Technological Quality of Sugarcane. Journal of Irrigation Drainage and Engineering 14: 201–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava, A.K., A.K. Shrivastava, and S. Solomon. 2011. Sustaining sugarcane productivity under depleting water resources. Current Science 101: 748–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, I., R.R. Verma, and T.K. Srivastava. 2017. Growth, yield, irrigation water use efficiency, juice quality and economics of sugarcane in pusa hydrogel application under different irrigation scheduling. Sugar Tech 20: 29–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, K., and A.S. Brar. 2015. Effect of planting methods and irrigation schedules on cane yield, quality, economics and water productivity of spring sugarcane (Saccharumofficinarum) in South Western Punjab. Indian Journal of Agronomy 60: 601–605.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, K., A.S. Brar, and S.K. Mishra. 2021. Improvement in productivity and profitability of sugarcane through drip fertigation in north Indian conditions. Sugar Tech 23: 536–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-020-00924-w.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, K., S.K. Mishra, and A.S. Brar. 2023. Optimizing sugarcane and water productivity through surface and subsurface drip fertigation in subtropical India. Sugar Tech 26: 63-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-023-01318-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, K., S.K. Mishra, M. Singh, K. Singh, and A.S. Brar. 2022. Water footprint assessment of surface and subsurface drip fertigated cotton-wheat cropping system: A case study under semi-arid environments of Indian Punjab. Journal of Cleaner Production 365: 132735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.(2022)132735.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, A.C. 2002. Energy savings through reduced tillage and trash mulching in sugarcane production. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 19: 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tank, U.N., U.M. Damor, J.C. Patel, and D.S. Chauhan. 1992. Response of summer greengram (Phaseolusradiatus) to irrigation, nitrogen and phosphorous. Indian Journal of Agronomy 37: 833–835.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, S., and B.N. Singh. 2014. Effect of irrigation schedules and planting methods on growth, productivity and WUE of green gram (Phaseolus radiate L.) under rice-wheat-green gram cropping system. Plant Archives 14: 211–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarekar, V.V., H.M. Patil, V.N. Game, and S.B. Gangawane. 2017. Effect of intercropping and planting methods on yield, quality and economics of sugarcane under lateritic soil condition. International Journal of Chemical Studies 5: 1895–1900.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors gratefully acknowledge the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, for providing funds to conduct these studies in the form of “North Indian Centre for Water Technology Research in Agriculture” (DST/TM/WTI/WIC/2k17/93).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ajmer Singh Brar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors state that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, K., Singh, K., Brar, A.S. et al. Water Productivity of Sugarcane + Summer Moong Intercropping System Under Subsurface Drip Irrigation and Straw Mulching. Sugar Tech (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-024-01401-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-024-01401-4

Keywords

Navigation