Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Resource Use Efficiency and Yield Advantage of Sugarcane-Based Cropping System in Tropical India

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Sugar Tech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sugarcane offers a unique potential for intercropping. To ensure the optimum productivity in an intercropping system, one must ensure that the peak periods of growth of the two crops do not coincide, so that one quick-maturing crop completes its life cycle before the main period of growth of the other crop starts. Though economic efficiency of sugarcane (Saccharumofficinarum) intercropping system has attracted a lot of attention around the world, interspecific competition between sugarcane and intercrops has not been studied so far. Field experiments were conducted during 2014–2015 and 2015–2016 at ICAR—Sugarcane Breeding Institute in split plot design with three rates of Nitrogen (N) (100, 75 and 50% of recommended N) to sugarcane as main plot treatments and six intercrops (I), namely finger millet, black gram, soybean, sesame, amaranthus and sunn hemp along with sole crop of sugarcane as subplot treatments. The yield and nitrogen balance of sugarcane and intercrops, and quality of sugarcane juice were determined. Land equivalent ratio (LER), was used to evaluate the potential advantages of the intercrops, Area Time Equivalency Ratio (ATER), Aggressivity (AG), and competitive ratio (CR) which based on crop yield and nitrogen acquisition were used to evaluate interspecific competition between sugarcane and intercrops. The results indicated that sugarcane–intercropping system had intercropping advantages based on LER. Application of 100% N has recorded higher number of millable canes and cane yield compared to 75% and 50% N levels. However, the cane yield at 100% N was on par with 75% N during 2015–2016. Higher ATER and CR recorded in case of sugarcane + soybean. Aggressivity (AG) was higher at 100% N level indicates its optimal dosage of N for the sugarcane growth. AG is greater than zero, indicating the competitive ability of sugarcane exceeds that of other intercrops. Net loss of N was also found less under the 100% N as compare to the rest of N levels and under sugarcane-based cropping system, there is heavy decline in N balance at post-harvest available N in the Sugarcane + finger millet intercropping system. Nitrogen levels and the sugarcane-based cropping system has not influenced the juice quality. Economics envisages reducing the N level is not advantageous for profitable system productivity. The best combination in terms of B:C ratio is sugarcane + amaranthus as the cost of cultivation is lower and the net return was higher.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anil, L., J. Park, R.H. Phipps, and F.A. Miller. 1998. Temperate intercropping of cereals for forage: A review of the potential for growth and utilization with particular reference to the UK. Grass and Forage Science 53 (4): 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2494.1998.00144.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, P., Q. Du, X. Liu , L. Zhou, S. Hussain, L. Lei, C. Song, X. Wang, W. Liu, F. Yang, K. Shu, J. Liu, J. Du, W.Yang, T. Yong. 2017. Effects of reduced nitrogen inputs on crop yield and nitrogen use efficiency in a long-term maize-soybean relay strip intercropping system. PLoS One 12(9): e0184503. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184503.

  • Corre-Hellou, G., A. Dibet, H. Hauggaard-Nielsen, Y. Crozat, M. Gooding, P. Ambus, C. Dahlmann, P. Von Fragstein, A. Pristeri, M. Monti, and E.S. Jensen. 2011. The competitive ability of pea-barley intercrops against weeds and the interactions with crop productivity and soil N availability. Field Crops Research 122 (3): 264–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2011.04.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhima, K.V., A.S. Lithourgidis, I.B. Vasilakoglou, and C.A. Dordas. 2007. Competition indices of common vetch and cereal intercrops in two seeding ratio. Field Crops Research 100: 249–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geetha, P., A.S. Tayade, C.A. Chandrasekar, T. Selvan, and Rajesh Kumar. 2019. Agronomic response, weed smothering efficiency and economic feasibility of sugarcane and legume intercropping system in tropical India. Sugar Tech 21: 838–842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-018-0689-9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Geetha, P., A.S. Tayade, R. Arun Kumar, and R. Kumar. 2021. Light interception in sugarcane-based intercropping system. Journal of Agrometeorology 21: 210–212. https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v21i2.235.

  • Geetha, P., K. Sivaraman, A.S. Tayade, and R. Dhanapal. 2015. Sugarcane-based intercropping system and its effect on cane yield. Journal of Sugarcane Research 5: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, K.A., and A.A Gomez. 1984. Statistical procedures for Agricultural Research. In: An IRRI book, 680. New York, USA.: Wiley Inter Science publication, John Wiley and Sons.

  • Hardwood, R.R. 1985. Sustainable Agriculture and Integrated Farm systems. 1984. /FOAM conference proceedings. East Lansing: Michigon State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiebsch, C.K., and R.E. McCollum. 1987. Area-×-Time Equivalency Ratio: A Method of Evaluating the Productivity of Intercrops. Agronomy Journal 79: 15–22. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1987.00021962007900010004x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphries, E. C. 1956. Modern methods of plant analysis. Edited by M. V. Ed. Paech, K. and Tracy. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

  • Khippal, Anil, Samar Singh, Rajender Sheokand, Jasbir Singh, Ramesh Verma, and Rakesh Kumar. 2016. Mechanized and profitable intercropping of legumes in autumn planted sugarcane. Legume Research-an International Journal 39: 411–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingle, Sarah E., and Craig L. Wiegand. 1997. Soil salinity and sugarcane juice quality. Field Crops Research 54: 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(97)00058-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lithourgidis, A.S., I.B. Vasilakoglou, K.V. Dhima, C.A. Dordas, and M.D. Yiakoulaki. 2006. Forage yield and quality of common vetch mixtures with oat and triticale in two seeding ratios. Field Crops Research 99: 106–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2006.03.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lithourgidis, Anastasios S., Christos A. Dordas, Theano B. Lazaridou, and Ioannis I. Papadopoulos. 2008. Silage yield and protein content of common bean intercropped with corn in two row-replacements. Italian Journal of Agronomy 3: 217–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, J.K. 1986. Multiple Cropping Systems. New York: Macmillan Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahadevaswamy, M., and G. James Martin. 2002. Production potential of wide row sugarcane intercropped with aggregatum onion (Allium cepa) under different row ratios, fertilizer levels and population densities. Indian Journal of Agronomy 47: 361–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazaheri, D., A. Madani, and M. Oveysi. 2006. Assessing the land equivalent ratio (Ler) of two corn [Zea Mays L.] varieties intercropping at various nitrogen levels in Karaj Iran. Journal of Central European Agriculture 7: 359–364.

  • McGilchrist, C.A. 1965. Analysis of competition experiments. Biometrics 21: 975. https://doi.org/10.2307/2528258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meade, G.P., and J.C.P. Chen. 1977. In: Cane Hand Book. (10th) Wiley Inter-Science. John Wiley and Sons, New York. p 882–885.

  • Menegay, M.R., J.N. Hubbell, and R.D. William. 1978. Crop intensity index: A research method of measuring land use in multiple cropping. HortScience 13 (1): 8–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naga Madhuri, K.V., M. Hemanth Kumar, and N.V. Sarala. 2011. Influence of higher doses of nitrogen on yield and quality of early maturing sugarcane varieties. Sugar Tech 13: 96–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-010-0060-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palaniappan, S.P. 1985. Cropping systems in the tropics: Principles and management. Agricultural Systems. Vol. 20. Wiley Eastern Ltd., New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-521x(86)90065-x.

  • Panda, S. C. 2009. Cropping and Farming Systems. Agro bios (India), Jodhpur.

  • Parsons, M.J. 2003. Successful intercropping of sugarcane. Proceedings of South African Sugar Technologists Association 7: 77–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, Rabindra Nath, and Ram Vimal Misra. 2005. Soil nitrogen balance assessment and its application for sustainable agriculture and environment. Science in China. Series c, Life Sciences/chinese Academy of Sciences 48: 843–855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subbaiah, V.V., and G.K. Asija. 1956. A rapid procedure for utilization of available nitrogen in soil. Current Science 26: 258–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundara, B., V. Natarajan, and K. Hari. 2002. Influence of phosphorus solubilizing bacteria on the changes in soil available phosphorus and sugarcane and sugar yields. Field Crops Research 77: 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00048-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundara, B. 1985. Short duration sugarcane-based sequential cropping system, 641003. Coimbatore -: Tamil Nadu Agricultural University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suryawanshi, M.W., M.G. Umate, P.B. Jagtap, and R.D. Jadhav. 2008. Studies on intercropping of pre-seasonal sugarcane and fertilizer management. Journal of Soils and Crops 18: 323–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tosti, Giacomo, and Marcello Guiducci. 2010. Durum wheat-faba bean temporary intercropping: Effects on nitrogen supply and wheat quality. European Journal of Agronomy 33: 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2010.05.001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vandermeer, J H. 1990. In: Intercropping in Agroecology. Editors: CR Carroll, JH Vandermeer & P. Rosset. McGraw Hill, New York.

  • Vasilakoglou, I., K. Dhima, A. Lithourgidis, and I. Eleftherohorinos. 2008. Competitive ability of winter cereal-common vetch intercrops against sterile oat. Experimental Agriculture 44: 509–520. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479708006728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verma, S.P., and S. Mongal. 1983. Production potential of economics of fertilizer application as resources content in maize wheat crop sequence. Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research 9: 89–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willey, R.W., and M.R. Rao. 1980. A competitive ratio for quantifying competition between intercrops. Experimental Agriculture 16: 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479700010802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willey, R.W. 1979. Intercropping - Its importance and research needs. 1. Competition and yield advantages. Field Crop Abstracts 32: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, W., Z. Li, J.W. Wang, P. Wu, and Y. Zhang. 2013. Crop yield, nitrogen acquisition and sugarcane quality as affected by interspecific competition and nitrogen application. Field Crops Research 146: 44–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2013.03.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank our beloved Directors, Dr. N. V. Nair and Dr. Bakshi Ram for granting the project and to conduct the research at ICAR- Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore. We also like to thank the farm managers Mr. Rajamohan and Mr. Rajan Babu; Technical assistants, Dr. C.A. Chandra sekar, M. Muthusamy, T. Selvan and Rajesh Kumar for the field establishment and maintenance. The project has been funded by Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), New Delhi, India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Crop Production, ICAR- Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Tamil Nadu, Coimbatore, 641007, India

    P. Geetha & A. S. Tayade

Authors
  1. P. Geetha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. S. Tayade
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Geetha.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Geetha, P., Tayade, A.S. Resource Use Efficiency and Yield Advantage of Sugarcane-Based Cropping System in Tropical India. Sugar Tech 25, 386–397 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-022-01204-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-022-01204-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation