Abstract
This study identified sugarcane press mud (SPM)—a by-product of sugarcane industry—as a possible feedstuff for pig production. Crossbred (Landrace × Desi) piglets (n = 28) were randomly allocated to four similar dietary groups of seven (four females and three males) each. The resulting treatments were: control (T0) diet with no inclusion of sun-dried SPM (SSPM) and diets T1, T2 and T3 contained SSPM at a level of 5, 10 and 15%, respectively, partially replacing maize, de-oiled soya bean meal and wheat bran. Performance traits such as feed intake, nutrient digestibility, immune response and economics of feeding were recorded until attaining marketable body weight (BW) of 80 ± 5 kg. Isonitrogenous and isocaloric diets were formulated for three different stages of pigs based on BW like weaner (10–20 kg; 60–75 days), grower (20–50 kg; 76–135 days) and finisher (50–80 kg; 136–195 days). A 7-day digestion trial was conducted during the grower stage. Results demonstrated that intake and total tract digestibilities of all major nutrients did not differ across treatments, except crude fibre intake, which was greater (P < 0.05) for groups T2 and T3. Intake and absorption of calcium (as % of intake) were higher (P < 0.01) for group T3 than other groups. Cell-mediated immune response did not vary among all dietary groups. Furthermore, mean body measurements (length, weight, heart girth and flank-to-flank length), average daily gain, feed conversion ratio and feed cost/kg BW gain were similar among all the groups with an additional comparative savings of INR 5.25/kg gain noted in group T3 than T0. Lastly, SSPM was found most economical in delivering unit protein and energy among all other conventional ingredients used in the experimental diets. In totality, these novel results suggested that SSPM could be formulated safely in the diets for swine at 15% without any detrimental consequences on performance measures, thereby concluding SSPM to be a prospective feedstuff for profitable pig production.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of Data and Material
All the mean data have been presented in the manuscript, and for the raw data, corresponding author shall be contacted.
References
Anonymous. 2021. Big jump in soybean meal exports on global demand. https://www.financialexpress.com/market/commodities/big-jump-in-soybean-meal-exports-on-global-demand/2213510/. Last accessed on 22 April 2021.
AOAC. 2005. Official methods of analysis. 18 rev. Gaithersburg, MD: AOAC International.
Dotaniya, M.L., S.C. Datta, D.R. Biswas, C.K. Dotaniya, B.L. Meena, S. Rajendiran, K.L. Regar, and M. Lata. 2016. Use of sugarcane industrial by-products for improving sugarcane productivity and soil health. International Journal of Recycling Organic Waste in Agriculture 5: 185–194.
Gunjal, A., and B. Gunjal. 2021. Management of pressmud (agroindustry by-product) by conversion to value-added products: A review. Proceedings of the Indian National Science Academy 87: 11–18.
Gupta, N., S. Tripathi, and C. Balomajumder. 2011. Characterization of press mud: A sugar industry waste. Fuel 90: 389–394.
Kornegay, E.T., P.H.G. Van Heugten, M.D. Lindemann, and D.J. Blodgett. 1989. Effects of biotin and high copper levels on performance and immune response of weanling pigs. Journal of Animal Science 67: 1471–1477.
Kumar, R., S.K. Saha, D. Kumar, M.S. Mahesh, and C.D. Malapure. 2017. Effect of dietary utilisation of sugarcane press mud on production performance of Muzaffarnagari lambs. Tropical Animal Health and Production 49: 1439–1446.
Lassaletta, L., F. Estellés, A.H.W. Beusen, L. Bouwman, S. Calvet, H.J.M. van Grinsven, J.C. Doelman, E. Stehfest, A. Uwizeye, and H. Westhoek. 2019. Future global pig production systems according to the shared socioeconomic pathways. Science of the Total Environment 665: 739–751.
Mahesh, M.S., S.P. Tripathi, and P.M. Puri. 2019. Nutrient composition, glucosinolate and vinyl-oxazolidine-thione profiling of Indian rapeseed (Brassica juncea Coss.) meal. Current Science 116: 838–841.
Mahto, B., N. Prasad, S.K. Singh, D. Mahto, S. Kumar, and U. Kumar. 2007. Effect of tamarind seed on nutrient utilization in pigs. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 24: 147–149.
NRC. 1998. Nutrient requirements of swine. 10 rev. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
NRC. 2012. Nutrient requirements of swine. 11 rev. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Patel, B.H.M., S. Kumar, S.B. Prasanna, and R. Kumar. 2019. Effect of jaggery filter cake supplementation on growth performance of Large White Yorkshire grower pigs. International Journal of Livestock Research 9: 49–56.
Sahu, S., B.H.M. Patel, T. Dutt, and A.K. Verma. 2014. Effect of graded level of sugarcane press mud in ration on carcass characteristics of crossbred (Landrace × Desi) pig. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 84: 1109–1112.
Sahu, S., B.H.M. Patel, C.D. Malapure, M. Ankita, A.K. Singh, G. Singh. Verma, and B. Bhusan. 2016. Screening of sugarcane press mud as a potential alternative feed for livestock. Indian Journal of Animal Research 50: 207–210.
Suresh, B.N., B.S.V. Reddy, P.C. Bolka, and B.C. Umashankar. 2010. Effect of sugarcane press residue on calcium and phosphorus status of layers. Indian Journal of Poultry Science 45: 364–367.
Suresh, B.N., B.S.V. Reddy, T.M. Prabhu, and N.K.S. Gowda. 2012. Growth performance of broilers fed sugarcane press residue incorporated diets. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology 12: 219–227.
Tran, G. 2015. Sugarcane press mud. Feedipedia, a programme by INRA, CIRAD, AFZ and FAO. http://www.feedipedia.org/node/563. Last accessed on 22 April 2021.
Wilkinson, J.M. 2011. Re-defining efficiency of feed use by livestock. Animal 5: 1014–1022.
Acknowledgements
Authors sincerely thank the financial support from the All India Coordinated Research Project on Pigs by Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India, and INSPIRE fellowship from the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India for Ph.D. programme of the first author. J.K. Sugar Mill, UP, India, and the Director, ICAR—Indian Veterinary Research Institute, are gratefully acknowledged for providing sugarcane press mud and providing laboratory facilities for this study, respectively. Authors are indebted to the anonymous reviewers for their constructive criticism on the earlier draft that greatly augmented overall merit of this paper.
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None declared.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
Ethics Approval
The synopsis of the present study was approved by the Academic Council. Handling and management of animals enrolled for the trial were done adhering to the ethical norms laid out by the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee of ICAR—Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, UP, India.
Consent to Participate
Not applicable.
Consent for Publication
All authors have agreed to publish the data presented in the paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sahu, S., Patel, B.H.M., Sarangi, A. et al. Sun-Dried Sugarcane Press Mud Could be a Prospective Feedstuff for Swine Production. Sugar Tech 24, 788–797 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-021-01061-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-021-01061-8