Abstract
Data-driven decisions can be performed based on crop yield values, essential information for precision agriculture practices. Technical solutions for yield mapping have been increasing for the sugarcane crop. However, the adoption of a yield monitor is low among farmers. An alternative is associating the amount of sugarcane harvested with the yield. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the sugarcane mass prediction by a hydraulic oil pressure sensor installed in the chopper of the harvester. A commercial sugarcane field was used for the field trial with four harvesters and an in-field wagon instrumented with the load cells. All equipment at the harvesting front were equipped with ZigBee technology for data transfer to the sugar mill's Remote control center. The redistribution of the total weight of sugarcane harvested within each field was based on the chopper hydraulic pressure variation. The yield monitor had a low prediction error (4.5%) compared to the total measured by the in-field wagon. The results suggest enhancing the frequency of data collection by the harvester improves the spatial variability detection of sugarcane yield at the field level. The distribution of the total mass of sugarcane harvested indicated that neither empirical model nor sensors calibration is required to estimate yield regardless of the harvester. In future, the application of telemetry and distribution of the total harvest within the field should be studied for other crops, e.g., grains, which already use this technology for the management of equipment in the field.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Momin, Md.A., T.E. Grift, D.S. Valente, and A.C. Hansen. 2019. Sugarcane yield mapping based on vehicle tracking. Precision Agriculture 20: 896–910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-018-9621-2.
Aiello, G., I. Giovino, M. Vallone, P. Catania, and A. Argento. 2018. A decision support system based on multisensor data fusion for sustainable greenhouse management. Journal of Cleaner Production 172: 4057–4065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.197.
Amaral, L.R., R.G. Trevisan, and J.P. Molin. 2018. Canopy sensor placement for variable-rate nitrogen application in sugarcane fields. Precision Agriculture 19: 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-017-9505-x.
Amiama, C., J. Bueno, C.J. Álvarez, and J.M. Pereira. 2008. Design and field test of an automatic data acquisition system in a self-propelled forage harvester. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 61: 192–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2007.11.006.
Baio, F.H. 2012. Evaluation of an auto-guidance system operating on a sugar cane harvester. Precision Agriculture 13: 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-011-9241-6.
Blackmore, S., and M. Moore. 1999. Remedial correction of yield map data. Precision Agriculture 1: 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009969601387.
Bramley, R.G.V., and T.A. Jensen. 2014. Sugarcane yield monitoring: A protocol for yield map interpolation and key considerations in the collection of yield data. International Sugar Journal 116: 370–379.
Canata, T.F., M.C.F. Wei, L.F. Maldaner, and J.P. Molin. 2021. Sugarcane yield mapping using high-resolution imagery data and machine learning technique. Remote Sensing 13: 232. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13020232.
Corrêdo, L. de P., T.F. Canata, L.F. Maldaner, J.J.A. Lima, and J.P. Molin. 2020. Sugarcane harvester for in-field data collection: State of the art, its applicability and future perspectives. Sugar Tech 23: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-020-00874-3.
Cox, G., H. Harris, and D. Cox. 1999. Application of Precision Agriculture to Sugar Cane. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Precision Agriculture, 753–765. Madison: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America. https://doi.org/10.2134/1999.precisionagproc4.c72.
Darr, M.J., D.J. Corbett, H. Herman, C. Vallespi-Gonzalez, B.E. Dugas, and H. Badino. 2019. Yield measurement and base cutter height control systems for a harvester. US 10371561 B2.
Fei, Z., J. Shepard, and S.G. Vougioukas. 2020. Estimation of Worker Fruit-Picking Rates with an Instrumented Picking Bag. Transactions of the ASABE 63: 1913–1924. https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.13981.
Jawad, H.M., R. Nordin, S.K. Gharghan, A.M. Jawad, and M. Ismail. 2017. Energy-efficient wireless sensor networks for precision agriculture: A review. Sensors 17: 1–45. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17081781.
Leroux, C., H. Jones, A. Clenet, B. Dreux, M. Becu, and B. Tisseyre. 2018. A general method to filter out defective spatial observations from yield mapping datasets. Precision Agriculture 19: 789–808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-017-9555-0.
Lima, J.J.A. de, L.F. Maldaner, and J.P. Molin. 2021. Sensor fusion with narx neural network to predict the mass flow in a sugarcane harvester. Sensors 21(13): 4530. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21134530.
Magalhães, P.S.G., and D.G.P. Cerri. 2007. Yield monitoring of sugar cane. Biosystems Engineering 96: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2006.10.002.
Maldaner, L.F., and J.P. Molin. 2020. Data processing within rows for sugarcane yield mapping. Scientia Agricola 77: e20180391. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-992x-2018-0391.
Maldaner, L.F., J.P. Molin, and T.F. Canata. 2016. Processing yield data from two or more combines. In 13th International Conference on Precision Agriculture, 1–9. St. Louis, Missouri: International Society of Precision Agriculture.
Maldaner, L.F., L. de P. Corrêdo, T.F. Canata, J.P. Molin. 2021. Predicting the sugarcane yield in real-time by harvester engine parameters and machine learning approaches. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 181: 105945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105945.
Molin, J.P., and L.A.A. Menegatti. 2004. Field-testing of a sugar cane yield monitor in Brazil. In ASAE/CSAE Annual International Meeting, 733–744. St. Joseph, MI. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.16159.
Ojha, T., S. Misra, and N.S. Raghuwanshi. 2015. Wireless sensor networks for agriculture: The state-of-the-art in practice and future challenges. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2015.08.011.
Passalaqua, B.P., and J.P. Molin. 2020. Path errors in sugarcane transshipment trailers. Engenharia Agricola 40: 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-ENG.AGRIC.V40N2P223-231/2020.
Pierce, F.J., and T.V. Elliott. 2008. Regional and on-farm wireless sensor networks for agricultural systems in Eastern Washington. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 61: 32–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2007.05.007.
Popescu, D., F. Stoican, G. Stamatescu, L. Ichim, and C. Dragana. 2020. Advanced UAV–WSN system for intelligent monitoring in precision agriculture. Sensors 20: 18–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20030817.
Price, R.R., R.M. Johnson, and R.P. Viator. 2017. An overhead optical yield monitor for a sugarcane harvester based on two optical distance sensors mounted above the loading elevator. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 33: 687–693. https://doi.org/10.13031/aea.12191.
Quaderer, J.G., and M.F. Cash. 2014. Sugar cane yield mapping. U.S. Patent No. 8,955,402
Sams, B., C. Litchfield, L. Sanchez, and N. Dokoozlian. 2017. Two methods for processing yield maps from multiple sensors in large vineyards in California. Advances in Animal Biosciences 8: 530–533. https://doi.org/10.1017/s2040470017000516.
Sanches, G.M., P.S.G. Magalhães, and H.C.J. Franco. 2019. Site-specific assessment of spatial and temporal variability of sugarcane yield related to soil attributes. Geoderma 334: 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.07.051.
Shendryk, Y., R. Davy, and P. Thorburn. 2021. Integrating satellite imagery and environmental data to predict field-level cane and sugar yields in Australia using machine learning. Field Crops Research 260: 107984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107984.
Silva, C.B., M.A.F.D. de Moraes, and J.P. Molin. 2011. Adoption and use of precision agriculture technologies in the sugarcane industry of São Paulo state, Brazil. Precision Agriculture 12: 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-009-9155-8.
Srbinovska, M., C. Gavrovski, V. Dimcev, A. Krkoleva, and V. Borozan. 2015. Environmental parameters monitoring in precision agriculture using wireless sensor networks. Journal of Cleaner Production 88: 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.036.
Ünal, İ. 2020. Integration of ZigBee based GPS receiver to CAN network for precision farming applications. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications 13: 1394–1405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-020-00897-3.
Xie, L., J. Wang, S. Cheng, B. Zeng, and Z. Yang. 2019. Performance Evaluation of a Chopper System for Sugarcane Harvester. Sugar Tech 21: 825–837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-019-00714-z.
Yu, X., W. Pute, W. Han, and Z. Zhang. 2013. A survey on wireless sensor network infrastructure for agriculture. Computer Standards and Interfaces 35: 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2012.05.001.
Zenglin, Z., W. Pute, H. Wenting, and Y. Xiaoqing. 2017. Remote monitoring system for agricultural information based on wireless sensor network. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers 40: 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/02533839.2016.1273140.
Acknowledgements
Authors thank the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), a Brazilian Federal Agency, (grant number 168643/2017-0), and to Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) (under Finance Code 001). Authors thank Solinftec Incorporated, Araçatuba SP, Brazil, for the partnership in this research. Especially to Thiago Cinelli Quaranta and Guilherme Guiné Pinto Ferreira for all the support offered during the development period of this research. Authors thank Zilor Sugarcane Mill, Quatá, São Paulo, Brazil, for all support in this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maldaner, L.F., Canata, T.F. & Molin, J.P. An Approach to Sugarcane Yield Estimation Using Sensors in the Harvester and ZigBee Technology. Sugar Tech 24, 813–821 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-021-01050-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-021-01050-x