Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Identification of Appropriate Agri-technologies Minimizing Yield Gaps in Different Sugarcane-Growing States of India

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Sugar Tech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In India, five states, viz., Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and Bihar, contribute about 84.64% sugarcane production of the country and occupy about 82.46% cropped area. The mean productivity of these states is also higher as compared to remaining states. However, the yield gap up to 33.0 t ha−1 prevails among these states. The performance of technologies in different states also varies depending on constrains and potentials of the region. Thus, the objectives of our study were (1) to assess the yield gap between attainable yield and farmers yield in potential sugarcane-growing states of the country and (2) to determine the long-term relationship between improved technologies and sugarcane yields at various levels. Yield gap analysis revealed that Uttar Pradesh recorded the highest positive correlation between period and sugarcane yield (R2 = 0.917/r = 0.96) and showed that technological advancements caused linear increase in sugarcane yield. Out of eight technologies, five technologies, i.e. improved variety, pit method of planting, intercropping, drip irrigation and ratoon management, enhanced sugarcane yield by > 20% and could be placed as top rankers. In Maharashtra, improved variety, ratoon management, intercropping and integrated nutrient management were recorded as top rankers and improved sugarcane yields in the range of 20.44–31.29%, individually. In Karnataka, drip irrigation, intercropping, ratoon management and improved varieties increased > 20% sugarcane yield as compared to state average sugarcane yield. However, wide row spacing and INM could increase yield level in the range of 15.17% and 17.65%, respectively. In Tamil Nadu, the various technologies could increase about 4.35–35.87% higher sugarcane yields as compared to farmers practice. Pit method planting showed the highest improvement in yield (35.87%). Improved varieties, integrated weed management, intercropping and ratoon management showed positive effect in the range of 13.28–19.0% as compared to mean of technologies demonstrated in five states. In Bihar, the improved variety contributed 40.2% yield increase as compared to state average yield (59.25 t ha−1). Ratoon management (35.14%) and intercropping in sugarcane (31.76%) could also be ranked in the top category in increasing sugarcane yields. Thus, it could be recorded that improved variety in Maharashtra and Bihar, pit/trench method of planting in Uttar Pradesh and Tamil Nadu drip irrigation and ratoon management in Karnataka are the major technologies contributing in sugarcane yield. Therefore, these technologies need to be promoted in the potential sugarcane-growing states to improve the national average.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abnave Vikas, B. 2019. Sustainability Concerns on Sugarcane production in Maharashtra, India: A Decomposition and Instability Analysis Working paper 441. ISBN 978-81-7791-297-5 © 2019. http://www.isec.ac.in/WP%20441%20-%20Abnave%20Vikas%20-%20Final.pdf.

  • Agrigoaexpert. 2020. http://agrigoaexpert.res.in/icar/category/agriculture/cashcrop/sugarcane.php.

  • Altieri, M.A., and C.I. Nicholls. 1999. Biodiversity, ecosystem function and insect- pest management in agricultural systems. In Biodiversity in Agroecosystems, ed. W.W. Collins and C.O. Qualset. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellakki, M.A., and V.P. Badanur. 1997. Long-term effect of integrated nutrient management on properties of vertisol under dry land agriculture. Journal of Indian Society of Soil Sciences 45: 438–442.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bogden, A.V. 1977. Tropical Pasture and Fodder Plants (Tropical Agriculture). Longman Group (Far East, Limited). ISBN 978-0582466760.

  • Chand, M., A. Khippal, S. Singh, R. Lal, and R. Singh. 2013. Productivity and profitability of sugarcane as affected by different planting patterns. Agriculture Science Digest 33: 203–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chauhan, R.S., G.B. Singh, and S.N. Srivastava. 1994. Herbicidal control of weeds in spring planted sugarcane. Bharatiya Sugar 20: 11–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • DAC. 2004–2018. Rainfall scenario and management of natural disasters. In: Agricultural Statistics at a glance. Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers Welfare releases, 404–454. Press Information Bureau, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Govt. of India.

  • DAC. 2018. Area, production and average yield of crops: Sugarcane: In: Agricultural Statistics at a glance. Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmers Welfare releases, 125–127. Press Information Bureau, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Govt. of India.

  • Dhawan, V. 2017. Water and agriculture in India. Background paper for the South Asia expert panel during the Global Forum for Food and Agriculture (GFFA). https://www.oav.de/fileadmin/user_upload/5_Publikationen/5_Studien/170118_Study_Water_Agriculture_India.pdf.

  • FAO. 2015. Yield Gap Analysis of Field Crops. Methods and Case studies. FAO Water Reports 41: 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gangwar, K.S., and S.K. Sharma. 1997. Simultaneous Planting of Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) and Wheat (Triticum aestivum) for Higher Productivity and Profitability in Sugarcane–Wheat System. Indian Journal of Agronomy 42: 657–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaon Connection. 2019. https://www.gaonconnection.com/read/meet-the-farmer-who-earns-in-lacs-from-sugarcane-farming-46605; https://www.thebetterindia.com/124175/suresh-kabade-100-tonnes-sugarcane-in-one-acre/.

  • Gopalasundaram, P. and C. Kailasam. 2003. Cane agronomy for wide row spacing. In: Advances in Sugarcane Production Technology, 61–66. Published by ICAR-Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore.

  • Hall, A.J., C. Feoli, J. Ingaramo, and M. Balzarini. 2013. Gaps between farmer and attainable yields across rain fed sunflower growing regions of Argentina. Field Crops Research 143: 119–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, J.W., and R.W. Schneider. 1988. Role of Pythium in sugarcane stubble decline. Effects on plant growth in field soil. Phytopathology 78: 1692–1696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katoch M. 2017. https://www.thebetterindia.com/124175/suresh-kabade-100-tonnes-sugarcane-in-one-acre/.

  • Malik, K.B., and F.G. Ali. 1990. Cane Yield Response to Seed Density and Row Spacing in Spring and Autumn Planting. Proceedings of Pakistan Society of Sugar Technology 25: 239–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manjappa, K. 1999. Sustainable Production of Planted and Ratoon Crop of Hybrid Rice Under Lowlands in Hill Zone of Karnataka. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad.

  • Nagendran, K.R., and P. Palanisamy. 1997. Spaced Row Planting Improves Sugarcane Yield. Kissan World 24: 11–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naidu, P. 2009. IPM in Sugarcane Assignment part of module B.XII—2009 http://tsri.com.vn/uploads/files/ipm_in_sugarcane.pdf.

  • Panwar, B.S., B.V. Singh, and J.C. Sharma. 1990. Feasibility of Intercropping in Autumn Planted Sugarcane. Indian Sugar 39: 755–756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ram, B., G. Hemaprabha, and P. Murali. 2017. Importance of New Varieties of Sugarcane Suitable for Tropical India. Indian Farming 67: 16–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma B.R., A. Gulati, G. Mohan, S. Manchanda, I. Rai, and U. Amarsinghe. 2018. Water Productivity Mapping of Major India Crops, pp 125–129.

  • Shukla, A. and S. Behera. 2018. Micronutrient Research in India: Retrospect and Prospects. All for a Good Harvest: Addressing Micronutrient Deficiencies. https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.20370.76489. https://www.pwc.in/assets/pdfs/research-insights/2019/all-for-a-good-harvest.pdf.

  • Shukla, S.K., S.K. Awasthi, R. Singh, M. Nigam, A. Gaur, and A.K. Singh. 2013a. Integrated Nutrient Management in Sugarcane-Based Production Systems: A Review. Current Advances in Agricultural Sciences 5: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shukla, S.K., K.K. Singh, A.D. Pathak, V.P. Jaiswal, and S. Solomon. 2017a. Crop Diversification Options Involving Pulses and Sugarcane for Improving Crop Productivity, Nutritional Security and Sustainability in India. Sugar Tech 19: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-016-0478-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla, S.K., L. Sharma, S.K. Awasthi, and A. D. Pathak. 2017b. In: Sugarcane in India: Package of Practices for Different Agro-climatic Zones, 1–64. Published by All India Coordinated Research Project on Sugarcane, Lucknow.

  • Shukla, S.K., M. Lal, and S.K. Singh. 2013b. Improving Bud Sprouting, Growth and Yield of Winter Initiated Sugarcane Ratoon. Soil and Tillage Research 126: 50–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla, S.K., P.N. Singh, R.S. Chauhan, and S. Solomon. 2015. Soil Physical, Chemical and Biological Changes and Long Term Sustainability in Subtropical India Through Integration of Organic and Inorganic Nutrient Sources in Sugarcane. Sugar Tech 17: 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-013-0300-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla, S.K., R.L. Yadav, R. Gupta, A.K. Singh, S.K. Awasthi, and A. Gaur. 2018a. Deep Tillage, Soil Moisture Regime, and Optimizing N Nutrition for Sustaining Soil Health and Sugarcane Yield in Subtropical India. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 49: 444–462.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla, S.K., R.L. Yadav, A. Suman, and P.N. Singh. 2008. Improving Rhizospheric Environment and Sugarcane Ratoon Yield Through Bio-agents Amended Farm Yard Manure in udic ustochrept Soil. Soil and Tillage Research 99: 158–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla, S.K., S. Solomon, L. Sharma, V.P. Jaiswal, A.D. Pathak, and P. Singh. 2019. Green Technologies for Improving Cane Sugar Productivity and Sustaining Soil Fertility in Sugarcane Based Cropping System. Sugar Tech 21: 186–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-019-00706-z.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla, S.K., S.K. Yadav, Menhi Lal, and A.D. Pathak. 2018b. Low Cost Technologies in Sugarcane Agriculture, 1–55. Lucknow: ICAR-All India Coordinated Research Project on Sugarcane, IISR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J.P., and S.K. Sharma. 1996. A New Agro-technique for Higher Yields in Wheat–Sugarcane Intercropping. Indian Farming 45: 21–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, P.N., S.K. Shukla, and V.K. Bhatnagar. 2007. Optimizing Soil Moisture Regime to Increase Water Use Efficiency of Sugarcane (Saccharum spp Hybrid Complex) in Subtropical India. Agricultural Water Management 90: 95–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swaminathan, M.S., and R.V. Bhavani. 2013. Food Production & Availability—Essential Prerequisites for sustainable Food Security. Indian Journal of Medical Research 138: 383–391.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, T.M., P.G. Brenchley, and D.E. Conlong. 2009. Progress in the Area-Wide Integrated Pest Management Plan for Eldana saccharina Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in the Midlands North Region of KwaZulu-Natal. Proceeding of the South African Sugar Technologists Association 82: 471–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, R., and R. Kumar. 2005. On-farm Comparison of Ring-Pit and Conventional Flat Planting Methods for Yield and Quality of Sugarcane in Northwest India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 75: 605–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yen, N., C. Thi Phuon, N.T. Xuan, V.T.B. Chi, T.B. Hong, M.T. Dut, H. Nhan, N.T. Nghia, H.N. Huy, and N.T. Loc. 2013. Study on Row Distance and Planting Method on Sugarcane Cultivation in Hau Giang Province. Omonrice 19: 172–179.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The present study was supported by All India Coordinated Research Project on Sugarcane at various centres. Authors acknowledge the support of all the AICRP centres for sharing the information under the scheme. Authors also duly acknowledge the support of Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, and Dept. of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Govt. of India, for providing funds for implementation of the programme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Dr SK Shukla conceived idea, collected desired information across the sugarcane-growing zones of the country and prepared draft of research paper. Dr LS and Dr VPJ analysed the data obtained from various centres. Dr ADP assisted in providing the necessary information required for status paper. Dr SKA, Mr AZ and Dr SKY assisted in Project Coordination Unit and contributed immensely for preparation of paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. K. Shukla.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shukla, S.K., Sharma, L., Jaiswal, V.P. et al. Identification of Appropriate Agri-technologies Minimizing Yield Gaps in Different Sugarcane-Growing States of India. Sugar Tech 23, 580–595 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-020-00907-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-020-00907-x

Keywords

Navigation