Abstract
The technical and agricultural planning of sugarcane crops has been crucial to ensure that high-quality millable cane is supplied to the sugar and alcohol industry. This study aimed to evaluate sugarcane development, sucrose accumulation (pol cane), stalk productivity, invertase activity, and ratoon regrowth with the application of plant regulators of the growth inhibitors class [sulfometuron methyl, glyphosate, and compounds from organic carboxylic radicals (C.C.) + glyphosate] for two consecutive years in the middle of the cropping season in Brazil. The treatment with plant regulators made positive influence on the technological quality of millable cane, mainly with regard to increase in the pol content. In weather conditions unfavorable to ripening, the plant regulators sulfometuron methyl and glyphosate were more efficient in increasing the sucrose content than C.C. + glyphosate and control treatments. A positive correlation was also recorded between climate conditions and invertases activity levels, mainly for the neutral invertase (NI). The NI levels under favorable weather conditions to natural ripeness were reported higher than unfavorable conditions to natural ripeness. Sulfometuron methyl increased soluble acid invertase (SAI) and NI activity levels of the sugarcane juice under unfavorable weather condition for ripening while glyphosate applied alone or in association with compounds from organic carboxylic radicals do not change of activity of enzymes. The C.C. + glyphosate and control treatments provided increase in the stalk productivity, while glyphosate reduced the yield. The plant regulators did not affect sugarcane ratoon regrowth.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abo El-Hamd, A.S., M.A. Bekheet, and A.F.I. Gadalla. 2013. Effect of chemical ripeners on juice quality, yield and yield components of some sugarcane varieties under the conditions of sohag governorate. American-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences 13(11): 1458–1464.
Alexander, A.G. 1973. Sugarcane Physiology. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Almeida, J.C.V., R. Sanomya, C.F. Leite, and N.F. Cassinelli. 2003. Eficiência agronômica de sulfometuron methil como maturador na cultura da cana-de-açúcar. STAB 21(3): 36–37.
Ansari, M.I., A. Yadav, and R. Lal. 2013. An-overview on invertase in sugarcane. Bioinformation 9: 464–465.
Banasihan, V.T., V.V. Macalaguim, and T.C. Mendoza. 2007. Glyphosate as a ripener in sugarcane production in Batangas. Philippine Journal of Crop Science 32(3): 31–45.
Caputo, M.M., M.A. Silva, E.G.F. Beauclair, and G.J.C. Gava. 2007. Acúmulo de sacarose, produtividade e florescimento de cana-de-açúcar sob reguladores vegetais. Interciência 32(12): 834–840.
Cardozo, N.P., and P.C. Sentelhas. 2013. Climatic effects on sugarcane ripening under the influence of cultivars and crop age. Scientia Agricola 70(6): 449–456.
Chandra, A., R. Jain, and S. Solomon. 2012. Complexities of invertases controlling sucrose accumulation and retention in sugarcane. Current Science 102: 857–866.
Dillewijn, C.Van. 1952. Botany of sugar cane. Waltham: Chronica Botanica.
Fernandes, A.C. 2003. Cálculos na agroindústria da cana-de-açúcar. Piracicaba: STAB.
Ferreira, D.F.S.I.S.V.A.R. 2008. A program for statistical analysis and teaching. Revista Symposium 6: 36–41.
Gayler, K.R., and K.T. Glasziou. 1972. Physiological functions of acid and neutral invertases in growth and sugar storage in sugar cane. Plant Physiology 27: 25–31.
Grof, C.P.L., P.L. Albertson, J. Bursle, J.M. Perroux, G.D. Bonnett, and J.M. Manners. 2007. Sucrose-phosphate synthase, a biochemical marker of high sucrose accumulation in sugarcane. Crop Science 47: 1530–1539.
Hatch, M.D., J.A. Sacher, and K.T. Glasziou. 1963. Sugar accumulation cycle in sugarcane. I. Studies on enzymes of the cycle. Plant Physiology 38: 338–343.
Kirubakaran, R., S. Venkataramana, and M.S. Mohamed Jaabir. 2013. Effect of ethrel and glyphosate on the ripening of sugar cane. International Journal of ChemTech Research 5(4): 1927–1938.
Lavanholi, M.G.D.P., A.A. Casagrande, L.A.F. Oliveira, G.A. Fernandes, and R.F. Rosa. 2002. Aplicação de Ethephon e Imazapyr em cana-de-açúcar em diferentes épocas e sua influência no florescimento, acidez do caldo e teores de açúcares nos colmos – variedade SP70-1143. STAB 20(5): 42–45.
Legendre, B.L. 1975. Ripening of sugarcane: effects of sunlight, temperature, and rainfall. Crop Science 15: 349–352.
Leite, G.H.P., and C.A.C. Crusciol. 2008. Reguladores vegetais no desenvolvimento e produtividade da cana-de-açúcar. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 43(8): 995–1001.
Lingle, S.E. 1999. Sugar metabolism during growth and development in sugarcane internodes. Crop Science 39: 480–486.
Melo, W.J., L.M.A. Bertipaglia, G.M.P. Melo, and V.P. Melo. 1998. Carboidratos. Jaboticabal: Funep.
Meschede, D.K., E.D. Velini, and C.A. Carbonari. 2010. Efeitos do glyphosate e sulfometuron-methyl no crescimento e na qualidade tecnológica da cana-de-açúcar. Planta Daninha 28(1): 1135–1141.
Millhollon, R.W., and B.L. Legendre. 2000. Growth and yield response of Louisiana sugarcane cultivars to annual preharvest treatments with the ripener glyphosate. Sugar Cane International 18: 5–9.
Morgan, T., P. Jackson, L. McDonald, and J. Holtum. 2007. Chemical ripeners increase early season sugar content in a range of sugarcane varieties. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 58: 233–241.
Pontin, J.C. 1995. Avaliação de maturadores vegetais na cana-de-açúcar. Álcool e Açúcar 77: 16–18.
Ricardo, C.P.P., and T. Rees. 1970. Invertase activity during the development of carrot roots. Phytochemistry 9: 239–247.
Richard Jr, E.P., C.D. Dalley, and R.P. Viator. 2006. Ripener influences on sugarcane yield in Louisiana. Proceedings of American Society of Sugar Cane Technologists 26: 54–55.
Rizzard, M.A., L. Vargas, E.S. Roman, and K. Kissmann. 2004. Aspectos gerais do manejo e controle de plantas daninhas. In Manual de manejo e controle de plantas daninhas, ed. Leandro Vargas and Erivelton Scherer Roman, 105–144. Bento Gonçalves: Embrapa.
Rodrigues, T.J.D., and I.C. Leite. 2004. Fisiologia vegetal – hormônios das plantas. Jaboticabal: Funep.
Rose, S., and F.C. Botha. 2000. Distribution patterns of neutral invertase and sugar content in sugarcane internodal tissues. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 38: 819–824.
Sachdeva, M., S. Bhatia, and S.K. Batta. 2011. Sucrose accumulation in sugarcane: a potential target for crop improvement. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 33: 1571–1583.
Scarpari, M.S., and E.G.F. Beauclair. 2004. Sugarcane maturity estimation through edaphic-climatic parameters. Scientia Agricola 61(5): 486–491.
Silva, M.A., and M.M. Caputo. 2014. Ripening and the use of ripeners for better sugarcane management. In Crop management: Cases and tools for higher yield and sustainability, ed. Fabio R. Marin, 2–24. Rijeka: InTech.
Terauchi, T., M. Matsuoka, M. Kobayashi, and H. Nakano. 2000. Activity of sucrose phosphate synthase in relation to sucrose concentration in sugarcane internodes. Japanese Journal of Tropical Agriculture 44: 141–151.
Viator, R.P., C.D. Dalley, and E.P. Richard Jr. 2011. Late-season glyphosate ripener application coupled with post-harvest residue retention impacts subsequent ratoon yields. International Sugar Journal 113(1349): 374–380.
Viator, R.P., R.M. Johnson, E.P. Richard Jr, H.L. Waguespack, and W. Jackson. 2008. Influence of nonoptimal ripener applications and postharvest residue retention on sugarcane second ratoon yields. Agronomy Journal 100(6): 1769–1773.
Vieira, I.M.S., E.T. Oliveira, L.A. Gallo, T.F.C. Batista, R.C. Rodrigues, and O.J. Crocomo. 1996a. Níveis de açúcares e atividade de invertases em cana-de-açúcar (Saccharumofficinalis spp.). I. Cultivares NA56-79 e CB41-76. Revista de Agricultura 71: 67–92.
Vieira, I.M.S., E.T. Oliveira, L.A. Gallo, T.F.C. Batista, R.C. Rodrigues, and O.J. Crocomo. 1996b. Níveis de açúcares e atividade de invertases em cana-de-açúcar (Saccharum spp.). II. Cultivares SP70-1143 e SP71-799. Revista de Agricultura 71: 197–224.
Zhu, Y.J., E. Komor, and P.H. Moore. 1997. Sucrose accumulation in the sugarcane stem is regulated by the difference between the activities of soluble acid invertase and sucrose phosphate synthase. Plant Physiology 115: 609–616.
Acknowledgments
To the Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) for financial support (2003/11906-9), to the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) for an award for excellence in research to the first author and to Raízen Group for providing the area where the experiments were carried out.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Crusciol, C.A.C., Leite, G.H.P., de Siqueira, G.F. et al. Response of Application of Growth Inhibitors on Sugarcane Productivity and Sucrose Accumulation in the Middle of Cropping Season in Brazil. Sugar Tech 19, 155–164 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-016-0450-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-016-0450-1