Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Response of Sugarcane Seed Plot to Microbial Inoculation by Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus and Phosphate-Solubilizing Bacteria

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Sugar Tech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted for three consecutive years to study the effect of set treatment of Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus and PSB on seed yield, quality and saving of chemical N and P fertilizers for sugarcane seed plot. The set inoculation of Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus + PSB coupled with 75 % recommended N and 75 % recommended P2O5 significantly improved the growth, two eye bud-set yield and quality. Among fertilizer levels, 75 % recommended N and 75 % recommended P recorded the highest yield of two eye bud-sets (883.63 and 885.44 thousands/ha, respectively). Between the inoculation treatments, fresh planting material inoculated with Acetobacter recorded higher two eye bud-sets (858.96 thousands/ha) than the uninoculated planting material from previous-year Acetobacter inoculated plot (828.47 thousands/ha); however, they were statistically indistinguishable. Moreover, the higher population and activity of G. diazotrophicus were observed at 75 % recommended N and 75 % recommended P. Among various interactions, the interaction of 75 % N and inoculation treatment showed significantly highest Acetobacter count in cuttings (7.38 × 104). The available N and P status of soil at harvest was significantly influenced by different fertilizer levels (N and P levels), inoculation treatments and their interactions as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aneja, K.R. 2003. Experiments in microbiology, plant pathology and biotechnology, 1–607. New Delhi: New Age International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhor, S.V., C.D. Deokar, D.M. Sawant, and R.B. Sonawane. 2006. Studies on effect of Acetobacter diazotrophicus biofertilizer on growth and quality parameters in sugarcane. Journal of Maharashtra Agricultural Universities 31(2): 219–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalcante, V.A., and J. Dobereiner. 1988. A new acid tolerant nitrogen fixing bacterium associated with sugarcane. Plant and Soil 108: 23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chauhan, H., A. Sharma, and S.K. Saini. 2010. Response of sugarcane to endophytic bacterial inoculation. Indian Journal of Sugarcane Technology 25(1&2): 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuentez-Ramirez, L.E., J. Caballero-Mellado, J. Sepul-Veda, and E. Martinez-Romero. 1999. Colonization of sugarcane by Acetobacter diazotrophicus is inhibited by high N fertilization. FEMS Microbial Ecology 29: 117–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuentez-Ramirez, L.E., T. Jiminez-Salgado, I.R. Abarca-Ocampo, and J. Caballero-Mellado. 1993. Acetobacter diazotrophicus, an indoleacetic acid producing bacterium isolated from sugarcane cultivars in Mexico. Plant and Soil 154: 145–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hari, K. 1995. Biofertilizers in sugarcane. Lead paper presented in 10th Sugarcane Research and Development Workers’ Meeting for South Karnataka, Shimoga, Karnataka, India.

  • Jackson, M.L. 1967. Soil chemical analysis. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kathiresan, G. 2008. Influence of organics and biofertilizers with graded levels of major nutrients on sugarcane yield, quality and economics under the soil having low, low and medium status of NPK. Cooperative Sugar 39(10): 45–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, R., and I.C. MacRae. 1991. Specific association of diazotrophic Acetobacter with sugarcane. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 23: 999–1002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muthukumarasamy, R., G. Revathi, and A.R. Solayappan. 1994. Biofertilizer—A supplement or substitute for chemical nitrogen for sugarcane crop. Cooperative Sugar 25: 287–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthukumarasamy, R., G. Revathi, S. Seshadri, and C. Lakshminarasimhan. 2002. Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus (syn. Acetobacter diazotrophicus), a promising diazotrophic endophyte in tropics. Current Science 83(2): 138–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panse, V.S., and P.V. Sukhatme. 1985. Statistical methods for agricultural workers. New Delhi: ICAR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, V.M., F.L. Olivares, and J. Dobereiner. 1994. Improved methodology for isolation of Acetobacter diazotrophicus and confirmation of its habitat. World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology 10: 101–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, T.R., and K.M. Naidu. 1987. Response of sugarcane varieties to biofertilizers under different soil conditions. Sugarcane 3: 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suman, A. 2003. Biological nitrogen fixation in relation to improving sugarcane productivity. In Summer School held at I.I.S.R., Lucknow, vol. 15, 61–64.

  • Tejera, N.A., E. Ortega, J. Ganzalez-Lopez, and C. Lluch. 2003. Effect of some abiotic factors on the biological activity of Gluconacetobacter diazotropics. Journal of Applied Microbiology 95: 528–1002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. R. Murumkar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Murumkar, D.R., Nalawade, S.V., Indi, D.V. et al. Response of Sugarcane Seed Plot to Microbial Inoculation by Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus and Phosphate-Solubilizing Bacteria. Sugar Tech 19, 26–32 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-016-0432-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-016-0432-3

Keywords

Navigation