Abstract
Sugarcane is one of the most efficient quantum converters, endowed with vast tillering, ratooning and biomass potential. Vast tillering potential, innumerable root primordia, two types of roots and emergence of leaves constitute a Compensatory Physiologic Continuum which imparts this plant a unique ability to tide over abiotic stress conditions, gaps in the field and agro-physiological disorders arising in its 12–18 months long cycle. Despite this, the recorded yields of sugarcane are about 168 mt ha−1 year−1 that is just 36 % of the theoretical maximum of 470 mt ha−1 year−1 (in Hawaii) and in India it is only 28.6 % of the theoretical maximum. The knowledge of the physiological constraints for improving the productivity by increasing the crop efficiency by use of light, CO2, water and nutrients, has not been of much help as the details of how to manage them and bring them to some practical optimums, is yet unknown. The major difficulty in relating any physiological parameter directly to the crop yield is the complexity of the interactions among the processes and pools of the plant. As the inputs of CO2, water and light can be limiting to the yields, more economical yields can be obtained by increasing the photosynthesis, nutrient use and transpiration efficiency. So despite the fact that each of these processes possess the potential for improvement of yield, the interrelationships between them show great difficulty in identifying an ideal ideotype that can result in yield increases under all the circumstances. The article attempts to elucidate upon the ways of improving the productivity of sugarcane under the Indian subtropics by utilizing knowledge on interactions of various plant processes involving indirect increased utilization of light through increased proportion of light absorbed and increase of efficiency in CO2 reduction by absorbed quanta that turn the plant more efficient with assimilate transport from leaf, phloem translocation and parenchymatous import of sucrose for removal of feedback inhibition to allow maintenance of high photosynthetic efficiency, increasing light absorption by increasing the leaf size, number of leaves per stalk and number of stalks per unit area, increasing the CO2 uptake through increase in stomatal conductance and decrease in boundary layer resistance to CO2 by decreasing leaf width, increasing the efficiency of partitioning of photosynthates and reducing the yields losses.

Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Agnihotri, V.P., and A.K. Shrivastava. 1994. Physio-pathological aspects of seed-piece transmissible diseases of sugarcane. In Current trends in sugarcane pathology, ed. G.P. Rao, A.G. Gillaspie Jr., P.P. Upadhyaya, A. Bergamin, V.P. Agnihotri, and C.T. Chen, 235–258. New Delhi: International Books & Periodical Supply Service.
Alexander, A.G. 1973. Sugarcane physiology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company.
Anderson, D.L., and G.H. Korndorfer. 1994. Historical and recent evidence for phosphorous fertilization for sugarcane production in Florida. Annl. Jt. Meet. ASSCT (Florida and Louisiana Divisions) 24, St Petersburg Beach, Florida, June 22–24 (c.f. Sugar Y Azucar 89(6): 27).
Anonymous, 1954–55. Annl. Rept. Sugarcane Research Station, Padegaon, India, 67–80.
Anonymous, 2011–12. Improving physiological efficiency of sugarcane (1) Germination, Annual Report IISR, Lucknow, 37.
Anonymous, 2010–11. Improving juice quality and stubble buds sprouting under low temperatures, Annual Report IISR, Lucknow, p 14.
Anonymous, 2011–12. Technology for high density cane farming through appropriate agronomy, precision machines and superior varieties, Annual Report IISR, Lucknow, p 14.
Arencibia, A., R.I. Vazquez, D. Prieto, P. Tellez, E.R. Carmona, A. Coego, L. Hernandez, G.A. de la Riva, and G. Selman-Housein. 1997. Transgenic sugarcane plants resistant to stem borer attack. Molecular Breeding 3: 247–255.
Balasundram, N. 2004. Control of flowering in sugarcane. In Physiological and molecular approaches for improving sugarcane productivity, (Shrivastava, et al, eds.), I.I.S.R., Lucknow 65–70.
Bosch, S., C.P.L. Grof, and F.C. Botha. 2004. Expression of neutral invertase in sugarcane. Plant Science 166(5): 1125–1133.
Botha, F.C. 2005. Biotechnology continues to move closer to wide-scale application in the industry: The IV Molecular Biology Workshop, CIRAD, Montpellier, France (c.f. Sugar Cane Iner. 23(3): 28).
Botha, F.C., and K.G. Black 1998. Sucrose phosphate synthase and sucrose synthase activity during maturation of internodal tissue in sugarcane. In Carbohydrate metabolism in plants: The pathways and their control, Cambridge, U.K. 8.
Brown, D.A. 1976. Preface, in Sugarcane Ripener Seminar Proceedings, May 22–4, Orlando, Florida, USA 1.
Buczynski, S.R., M. Thom, P. Chourey, and A. Maretzki. 1993. Tissue distribution and characterization of sucrose synthase isozymes in sugarcane. Journal of Plant Physiology 142: 641–646.
Bugos, R.C., and M. Thom. 1993. Glucose transporter cDNA from sugarcane. Plant Physiology 103: 1469–1470.
Chauhan, R.S., R.S. Verma, and K.C. Pathak. 1984. Effect of CCC application in improving the stubble sprouting and yield of winter harvested rations. Co-operative Sugar 20(5): 315–317.
Clements, H.F. 1984. Sugarcane crop-logging and crop control: Principles and perspectives, 520. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.
Croft, B.J., and A. Magnanini. 2007. Chemical control of sugarcane vertical growth to improve the quality of seed cane. Sugar Cane International 25(3): 8.
Gahrtz., M., Stolz, J., and N. Sauer. 1994. A phloem specific sucrose H+ symporter from Plantago major L. supports the model of apoplastic phloem loading. Plant Journal 6:697–706.
Getz, H.P., M. Thom, and A. Maretzki. 1991. Proton and sucrose transport in isolate tonoplast vesicles from sugarcane stalk tissue. Physiologia Plantarum 83: 404–410.
Gillaspie Jr., A.G., Upadhyaya, P.P., Bergamin, A., Agnihotri, V.P. and C.T. Chen. International Books & Periodical Supply Service, Delhi, 235–258.
Groff, C.P.L., and J.A. Campbell. 2004. Molecular manipulation of sucrose metabolism in sugarcane. In Sugarcane: Production management and agro-industrial imperatives, ed. S. Solomon, S.S. Grewal, Y.R. Li, R.C. Magarey, and G.P. Rao, 507–527. Lucknow, India: International Book Distributing Co.
Grewal, S.S., Li, Y.-R., Magarey, R.C., and G.P. Rao, International Book Distributing Co., Lucknow, India 507–527.
Hatch, M.D., and K.T. Glasziou. 1963. Sugar accumulation cycle in sugarcane. II. Relationship of invertase activity to sugar content and growth rate in storage tissue of plants grown in controlled environments. Plant Physiology 38: 344–348.
Jain, R., S. Solomon, and A.K. Shrivastava. 2006. Sugarcane germination: An overview. Indian Sugar 55(11): 15–30.
Joyce, P., M. Kuwahata, N. Urner, and P. Lakshmanan. 2010. Selection system and co-cultivation medium are important determinants of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of sugarcane. Plant Cell Reports 29: 173–183.
Kalunke, R.M., A.M. Kolge, K.H. Babu, and D.T. Prasad. 2009. Agrobacterium mediated transformation of sugarcane for better resistance using Cry 1Aa3 gene and one step regeneration of transgenic plants. Sugar Tech 11: 335–339.
Kaur, S., S.K. Batta, J.S. Sital, K.P. Sharma, and A.P.S. Mann. 2002. Partial purification and properties of soluble invertase isoforms from sugarcane storage tissues. Indian Sugar 51(2): 851–857.
Lakshmanan, P., and G.R. Smith. 2004. Sugarcane biotechnology: The challenges and opportunities. In Sugar Cane: Production management and agro-industrial imperatives, ed. S. Solomon, S.S. Grewal, Y-rui Li, R.C. Magarey, and G.P. Rao, 529–552. Lucknow, India: International Books Distributing Comp.
Lentini, R.S.I., Anderson, D.L., and J.E. Bowen. 1995. Sugarcane nutritional analysis programme (SNAP): A simple expert system. Sugar Cane 22: 6–30.
Lingle, S.E. 1989. Evidence for the uptake of sucrose intact into sugarcane internodes. Plant Physiology 90: 6–8.
Lingle, S.E. 1995. Growth and sugar accumulation rate in contrasting cultivars. Agr. Abst. Annual meeting ASA, CSSA, SSCA, October 2–Nov., 3, St., Missouri 102. (Abst. Only).
Lingle, S.E., and J.M. Dyer. 2001. Cloning and expression of sucrose synthetase—1 cDNA from sugarcane. Journal of Plant Physiology 158: 129–131.
Manickavasagam, M., A. Ganapati, V.R. Anbazhagan, B. Sudhakar, N. Selvaraj, A. Vasudevan, and S. Kasthurirengan. 2004. Agrobacterium mediated genetic transformation and development of herbicide resistant sugarcane (Ssaccharum species hybrids) using axillary buds. Plant Cell Reports 23: 134–143.
McQualter, R.B., B. Fong-Chong, K. Meyer, D.E. van Dyk, M.G. O’Shea, N.J. Walton, P.V. Viitanen, and S.M. Brumbley. 2005. Production of p-hydroxy benzoic acid in transgenic sugarcane. Plant Biotechnology Journal 3(1): 29–41.
Moore, P.H. 1995. Temporal and spatial regulation of sucrose accumulation in the sugarcane stem. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 22: 661–679.
Narendranath, M. 1992. Cost-effectiveness of transplanting nursery-raised sugarcane bud chip plants on commercial sugar plantations. Proceedings International Society for Sugar cane Technologist 11: 125.
Panje, R.R., and T. Raja Rao. 1964. Studies on germination and moisture relationships of sugarcane setts. New Phyotologists 632: 140–152.
Panje, R.R. 1965. How to Improve Sugar Content of Cane, Technical Bulletin No. 1, Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow, India 19.
Peng, S.Y., and L.T. Twu. 1970. Application of plant growth regulating substances to improve germination and yield of ratoon cane. Taiwan Sugar 25: 8–17.
Quintus, R.A. 1923. The cultivation of sugarcane in Java, 164. London: Norman Rodger.
Rae, A.L., C.P.L. Grof, R.E. Casu, and G.D. Bonnett. 2005. Sucrose accumulation in the sugarcane stem; pathways and control points for transport and compartmentation. Field Crops Research 92(3): 159–168.
Rae, A.L., J.M. Perroux, and C.P.L. Grof. 2004. Sucrose partitioning between vascular bundles and storage parenchyma in the sugarcane stem: a potential role for the shSUT1 sucrose transporter. Planta 220: 817–825.
Rai, R.K., Singh, P., Solomon, S., Shrivastava, A.K. 2014. Augmenting sugar productivity: Physiobiochemical interventions, Tech Bulletin, IISR, Lucknow, p. 107.
Reismeier, J.W., L. Willmitzer, and W.B. Frommer. 1994. Evidence for an essential role of the sucrose transporter in phloem loading and assimilate partitioning. The EMBO Journal 11: 4705–4713.
Roitsch, T., M. Bittner, and D.E. Godt. 1995. Induction of apoplastic invertase of Chenopodium rubrum by d-glucose and a glucose analogue and tissue specific expression suggest a role in sink resource regulation. Plant Physiology 108: 285–294.
Sachdeva, M., A.P.S. Mann, and S.K. Batta. 2003. Sucrose metabolism and expression of key enzyme activities in low and high sucrose storing genotypes. Sugar Tech 5(4): 265–271.
Sharma, H.K., Singh, O., and R.S. Kanwar. 1987. Effects of nitrogen in combination with growth regulators on ratoons of low temperature harvested sugarcane. Proceedings Annual Convention Sugar Technologists Association of India 50: 81–86.
Shrivastava, A.K. 1994. Compensatory mechanisms operating in sugarcane. Sugar Crops Newsletter 4(2): 14–15.
Shrivastava, A.K. 2004. Yield decline and its management in sugarcane. Management and agro-industrial imperatives (eds. Solomon, S., S.S. Grewal, Yang-rui Li, R.C. Magarey and G.P. Rao) International Book Distributing Co., India 321–345.
Shrivastava, A.K. 2006. Sugarcane at a glance, 257. Lucknow, India: International Book Distributing Company.
Shrivastava, A.K., and S. Solomon. 2009. Sugarcane: Physiological basis of recovery, 400. Lucknow, India: International Book Distributing Company.
Shrivastava, A.K., and M.K. Srivastava. 2006. Abiotic stresses affecting sugarcane: Sustaining productivity, 322. Lucknow, India: International Book Distributing Company.
Shrivastava, A.K., Shahi, H.N., and V.P. Agnihotri. 2002. Ripening of sugarcane and its management for improving sugar production, 310. Lucknow: Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research.
Shrivastava, A.K., D.C. Srivastava, S. Solomon, M.K. Srivastava, and I. Singh. 2003. Physiological characters imparting resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses in sugarcane. Sugar Tech 5(3): 105–120.
Singh, P., Arya, N., Tiwari, P., Suman, A, Rai, R.K., Shrivastava, A.K., and S. Solomon. 2008. Use of glutaraldehyde and benzalkonium chloride for minimizing post-harvest physio-chemical and microbial changes responsible for sucrose losses in sugar cane. Journal of Food and Agriculture Chemistry. 56(16): 7176–7183.
Solomon, S. 2009. Post-harvest deterioration of sugarcane. Sugar Tech 11(2): 109–123.
Solomon, S., Shrivastava, A.K., Srivastava, B.L., and V.K. Madan 1997. Pre-milling sugar losses and their management in sugarcane. Technical Bulletin No. 37, Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucklnow 217.
Srinivasan, T.V., and N.C. Jalaja. 1995. Symposium on varietal deterioration in sugarcane (Feb., 15). Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow, India.
Srivastava, K.K., R. Narasimhan, and R.K. Shukla. 1981. A new technique for sugarcane planting. Indian Farming 31(3): 15–17.
Twine, P.H. 2006. The sugarcane biofactory-building blocks for the future. International Sugar Journal 108(1285): 12–17.
Tymowaska-Lalanne, Z., and M. Kries. 1998. The plant invertases: Physiology, biochemistry and molecular biology. In Advances in plant pathology, ed. J.A. Callow, 71–117. San Diego: Academic Press.
van Dillewijn, C. 1952. Botany of sugarcane, 352. Waltham, Mass: The Chronica Botanica Press.
Wang, A.-Q., W.-A. Dong, Y.-W. Wei, C.-M. Huang, L.-F. He, L.-T. Yang, and Y.-R. Li. 2009. Transformation of sugarcane with ACC oxidase antisense gene. Sugar Tech 11: 39–43.
Wang, Z.-Z., S.-Z. Zhang, B.-P. Yang, and Y.-R. Li. 2005. Trehalose synthase gene transfer mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens enhances resistance to osmotic stress in sugarcane. Sugar Tech 7: 49–54.
Wu, L., and R.G. Birch. 2007. Doubled sugar content in sugarcane plants modified to produce a sucrose isomer. Plant Biotechnology Journal 5: 109–117.
Xu A.W.T., Mc Carty D.R., and K.E. Koch. 1996. A similar dichotomy of sugar modulation and development expression affects both paths of sucrose metabolism: Evidence from a maize invertase gene family. Plant cell. 8 : 1209–1220.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shrivastava, A.K., Solomon, S., Rai, R.K. et al. Physiological Interventions for Enhancing Sugarcane and Sugar Productivity. Sugar Tech 17, 215–226 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-014-0321-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-014-0321-6

