Sugar Tech

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 286–294 | Cite as

Determination of the Water Requirement and Kc Values of Sugarcane at Different Crop Growth Stages by Lysimetric Method

  • Sanda Kyaw WinEmail author
  • Oscar B. Zamora
  • San Thein
Research Article


The water requirement of sugarcane was studied in a lysimeter set up at the Sugarcane Research and Seed Farm, Pyinmana, Mandalay Division, Myanmar. Sugarcane variety Phil 74/64 and grass (locally called Wun be sa; Echinochloa colona L.) were used. Daily crop water uptakes for both cane and grass were recorded from the lysimeter and the crop coefficient (Kc value) was re-derived. Sugarcane crop evapotranspiration or crop water uptake was also determined using the Penman–Monteith (FAO) method from daily weather data gathered from the nearby agrometerological station. The total sugarcane water consumption in the lysimeter study was 1369.84 mm year−1 and the average sugarcane yield was 173.29 t ha−1. Water use efficiency in the lysimeter study was 12.65 t cane ML−1 (0.13 t mm−1). The locally determined Kc values were 0.53, 0.81, 1.25, and 1.27 for initial, development, mid and late sugarcane growth stages, respectively.


Sugarcane Lysimeter Kc value Evapotranspiration 



I would like to express my sincerest gratitude to the Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organization Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEAMEO–SEARCA) for the scholarship Grant and all those who have helped me in my research at Sugarcane Research and Seed farm, Pyinmana, Mandalay Division, Myanmar.


  1. Allen R.G., Periera L.S., Raes D., and Smith M. (1998) Evapotranspiration–guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
  2. Inman-Bamber, N.G., and M.G. Mc Glinchey. 2003. Crop coefficients and water-use estimates for sugarcane based on long-term Bowen ratio energy balance measurements. Field Crops Research 83: 125–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Inman-Bamber, N.G., and D.M. Smith. 2005. Water relation in sugarcane and response to water deficits. Field Crops Research 92: 185–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Meade, G.P., and J.C.P. Chen. 1977. Cane sugar handbook, 10th ed. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Thein, San, and Salai Tun Than. 1990. Measurement of sugarcane evapotranspiration by compensation lysimeter. Myanmar Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2(1): 31–40.Google Scholar
  6. Sanda Kyaw Win, San Thien, and Khin Lay Swe (2004) Effects of pre-planting treatments on germination, growth and yield of sugarcane. Proceeding of the Annual Research Conference, Myanmar Academy of Agricultural Science, Yangon.Google Scholar
  7. Shih S.S., Gascho G.J., and Mishoe J.W. 1977. A lysimeter system for water table control. Paper Number 77–2575 of University of Florida. Paper contributed to American society of Agricultural Engineers. St. Joseph, Michigan, 49085.Google Scholar
  8. Thompson, G.D. 1976. Water use by sugarcane, 371. Waltham: Chronica Botanics.Google Scholar
  9. Thompson, G.D., and J.P. Boyce. 1967. Daily measurements of potential evapotranspiration from fully canopied sugarcane. Agricultural Meteorology 4: 267–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Watanabe, K., K. Yamamoto, T. Yamada, T. Sakuratani, E. Nawata, C. Noichana, A. Sributta, and H. Higuchi. 2004. Changes in seasonal evapotranspiration, soil water content, and crop coefficients in sugarcane, cassava, and maize fields in Northeast Thailand. Agricultural Water Management 67: 133–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Sugar Research & Promotion 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sugarcane Development DepartmentMinistry of Agriculture and IrrigationNayPyiTawMyanmar
  2. 2.Crop Science ClusterUniversity of the PhilippinesLos BanosPhilippines

Personalised recommendations