Abstract
Salinity in sugarcane decreases sucrose contents and reduces the efficiency of sucrose recovery in sugar mills. As growth, development and sucrose accumulation are regulated by phosphorus accumulation and modulation of its inorganic and organic fractions during growth cycle, the present experiment was taken up to evaluate the effect of salinity with seven treatments with induced ECe values in three categories (i) Low: <2 dS m−1 with de-ionised water (T1) sodium chloride I; 34.2 mg eq L−1 (T2), Sodium sulphate I; 53.5 mg eq L−1 (T4), and NaCl I + NaSO4 I; 17.4 + 24.8 mg eq L−1 (T6), (ii) medium : between 3 and 7 dS m−1 with sodium chloride II; 205.1 mg eq L−1 (T3) and sodium sulphate II; 353.5 mg eq L−1 (T5) and (iii) High: >7 dS m−1 with NaCl II + NaSO4 II (105.3 + 176.3 mg eq L−1, (T7), at early growth (160 days) in two sugarcane cultivars CoLk 8102 and Co 1148. T3, T5 and T7 increased the pool size of inorganic phosphorus (P) and decreased organic phosphorus fractions (acid soluble, lipid, nucleotide and nucleoprotein) in leaf laminae of both varieties significantly as compared to control. However inorganic-P pool size was 16, 16 and 13 % higher in CoLk 8102 as compared to Co 1148. On the contrary, organic-P fractions were 26, 23 and 25 % lesser in CoLk 8102 than Co 1148. The inorganic-P fractions were 9, 20 and 14 % higher in CoLk 8102 as compared with Co 1148 while organic-P fractions were lesser by 13, 15 and 11 % in CoLk 8102 as compared with Co 1148 with T2, T4 and T6. Overall, T3, T5 and T7 induced significant reduction in total tissue phosphorus concentration during growth cycle as compared to control in both varieties and showed strong negative correlation with leaf area, cane dry weight and sucrose contents.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- LTM:
-
Last transfer mark
- YL:
-
Young leaf (leaf laminae number 0–2)
- ML:
-
Middle leaf (leaf laminae number 3–6)
- OL:
-
Old leaf (leaf laminae number 7–10)
- EGP:
-
Early growth phase: 160 days after planting
- MP:
-
Maturity phase: 340 days after planting
- EC:
-
Electrical conductivity
- OM:
-
Organic matter
- SP:
-
Saturation percent
- P:
-
Phosphorus
References
Apse, M.P., and E. Blumwald. 2007. Na+ transport in plants. FEBS Letters 581: 2247–2254.
Awad, A.S., D.G. Edwards, and L.C. Campbell. 1990. Phosphorus enhancement of salt tolerance of tomato. Crop Science 30: 123–128.
Barrett-Lennard, E.G. 1986. Effect of water logging on the growth and CaCl2 uptake by vascular plants under saline conditions. Reclamation and Revegetation Research 5: 245–261.
Bernstein, L., R.A. Clark, L.E. Francois, and M.D. Derderian. 1966a. Salt tolerance of N Co varieties of sugarcane. II. Effect of soil salinity and sprinkling on chemical composition. Agronomy Journal 58: 503–507.
Bernstein, L., L.E. Francois, and R.A. Clark. 1966b. Salt tolerance of N Co varieties of sugarcane. I. Sprouting, growth and yield. Agronomy Journal 58: 489–493.
Fiske, C.H., and Y. Subbarow. 1925. The colorimetric determination of phosphorus. Journal of Biological Chemistry 66: 375–400.
Ginoza, H., and P.H. Moore. 1985. Screening sugarcane varieties for tolerance to salinity. Report of the Hawaiian Sugar Technologists 43: FE5–FE6.
Gomez, P.J.F., and A.J.S. Torres. 1993. Effect of salinity in the development of production of two varieties of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.). Serre Tecnica-Centro, de Investigacion de la cana Azucar de Columbia 12: 35–36.
Hall, J.R., and T.K. Hodges. 1966. Phosphorus metabolism of germinating oat seeds. Plant Physiology 41: 1459–1464.
Hunsigi, G. 1993. Production of sugarcane—theory and practice. Advance Series in Agricultural Sciences, vol. 21, 37–40. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
Jackson, M.L. 1973. Soil chemical analysis, 498. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India Ltd.
Kresovich, S., R.E. McGee, H.J. Drawe, and J.L. Rivera. 1986. Variability of agronomic characters in populations of tissue culture derived and vegetatively propagated sugarcane. Proceedings of International Society for Sugarcane Technologists 19: 528–532.
Liu, L.J. 1967. Salinity effect on sugarcane germination, growth and root development. Journal of Agricultural University Puerto Rico 3: 201–209.
Liu, M.C., S.C. Shih. 1986. Salt stress induced increase in nitrate reductase activity and proline contents in sugarcane cultures. Proceedings of International Society for Sugarcane Technologists 19: 263–272.
Maas, E.V. 1990. Crop salt tolerance. In Agricultural salinity assessment and management, ed. K.K Tanji, 262–304. New York: American Society of Civil Engineers.
Maas, E.V., and G.J. Hoffman. 1977. Crop salt tolerance—current assessment. Journal of Irrigation Drainage Division ASCE 103: 115–134.
Manchanda, H.R., S.K. Sharma, and D.K. Bhandari. 1982. Response of barley and wheat to phosphorus in the presence of chloride and sulphate salinity. Plant and Soil 66: 233–241.
Marschner, H. 1995. Mineral nutrition of higher plants, 2nd ed, 489. London: Academic Press.
Martinez, V., and A. Lauchli. 1991. Phosphorus translocation in slat stress cotton. Physiologia Plantarum 83: 627–632.
Martinez, V., and A. Lauchli. 1994. Salt induced inhibition of phosphate uptake in plants of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). New Phytologist 125: 609–614.
Meade, G.P., and J.C.P. Chen. 1977. Cane sugar handbook. New York: Wiley.
Mimura, T., K. Sakano, and T. Shimmen. 1996. Studies on the distribution, re-translocation and homeostasis of inorganic phosphate in barley leaves. Plant, Cell and Environment 19: 311–320.
Moore, P.H. 1987. Breeding for stress resistance. In Sugarcane improvement through breeding, ed. D.J. Heinz, 503–542. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Oertli, J.J. 1968. Extra cellular salt accumulation, a possible mechanism of salt injury in plants. Agrochemica 12: 461–469.
Piper, C.S. 1942. Soil and plant analysis: monograph from Waite agricultural research. Adelaide: The University Institute.
Prothero, G. 1978. The effect of saline irrigation water on sugarcane ripening. Annual Conference of the Hawaiian Sugar Technologists 37: 69–71.
Ravikovitch, S., and D. Yoles. 1971. The influence of phosphorus and nitrogen on millet and clover growing in soils affected by salinity. 1. Plant composition. Plant and Soil 35: 568–588.
Rizk, T.Y., and W.C. Normand. 1969. Effects of salinity on Louisiana sugar cane. International Sugar Journal 71: 227–230.
Rozeff, N. 1995. Sugarcane and salinity–a review paper. Sugarcane 5: 8–19.
Santa-Maria, G., F. Rubio, J. Dubcovski, and A. Rodriguez-Navaro. 1997. The HAK1 gene of barley is member of large gene family and imports a high affinity potassium transporter. The Plant Cell 9: 2281–2289.
Sehgal, J.L., D.R. Mandal, C. Mandal, and S. Vadivelu. 1990. Agro-ecological regions of India. India: NBSS & LUP Nagpur.
Syed, M., S. A. El-Swaify. 1972. Effect of saline water irrigation on N Co 310 and H50 cultivars of sugar-cane: I. Growth parameters. Tropical Agriculture 49: 337–346.
Tang, C., N.E. Longnecker, C.J. Thompson, H. Greenway, and A.D. Robson. 1992. Lupin (Lupinous angustifolius L.) and pea (Pisum sativum, L.) roots differ in their sensitivity to pH above 6.0. Journal of Plant Physiology 140: 715–719.
Tanimoto, T.T. 1969. Differential physiological response of sugarcane varieties to osmotic pressure of saline media. Crop Science 9: 683–688.
Vaildivia, V.S. 1978. Effect of excess sodium on sugarcane yield. Proceedings of International Society for Sugarcane Technologists 16: 861–866.
Wallace, T. 1951. The diagnosis of mineral deficiencies in plants. London: HMSO.
Wiegand, C., G. Anderson, S. Lingle, and D. Escobar. 1996. Soil salinity effects on crop growth and yield—illustration of an analysis and mapping methodology for sugarcane. Journal of Plant Physiology 148: 418–424.
Acknowledgments
We thank the technical staff and Research fellows at the Division of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry for assistance during experimentation, IISR, Lucknow.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rai, R.K., Singh, P. Sodium Salt Induced Utilization of Phosphorus in Sugarcane Leaf Laminae Reduces Sucrose Contents. Sugar Tech 15, 165–176 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-012-0190-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-012-0190-9