Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of Drought Tolerance Potential of Elite Genotypes and Progenies of Sugarcane (Saccharum sp. hybrids)

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Sugar Tech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to identify drought tolerant genotypes and study the pattern of segregation for drought, 28 elite sugarcane hybrids and 165 progenies from a proven commercial cross (Co 740 × Co 775) were evaluated for sugar yield attributes and biochemical parameters under normal and drought conditions. In the genotypes, higher reduction in drought in relation to the normal condition were observed for internode length (45.76 %), single cane weight (25.5 %), NMC (22.8 %), cane length (20.10 %) and sucrose content (18.73 %), while cane diameter (2.92 %), internode number (3.58 %) and Brix (−6.99 %) showed marginal variation. Similar reduction in cane height (35.05 %) and internode length (25.13 %) in the progenies indicated that cane length was more adversely affected by drought and the reduction was through shortening of internodes than reduction in internode number. These two easily scorable parameters in field and showing significant positive correlation under normal and drought conditions could serve as reliable characters in drought screening. Nitrate reductase activity showed reduction in the genotypes (39.11 %) and progenies (44.95 %), while proline accumulation and activities of superoxide dismutase and peroxidase almost doubled in the genotypes and progenies. The tolerant genotypes viz. Co 740, ISH 100, NS 83/247, Co 85019, Co 997 and Co 99008 could be utilized in crop improvement, while Co 419, Co 8021, Co 775 and Co 8368 were susceptible. Higher proportion of drought tolerant genotypes reflected the genetic nature of sugarcane hybrids with genome contribution from the drought tolerant species S. spontaneum.. The population of 165 progenies was categorized into five classes of varying levels of tolerance that followed a normal distribution and hence its value as an immortal mapping population for genetical and molecular studies on drought tolerance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, R.D. 1995. Dissection of oxidative stress tolerance using transgenic plants. Plant Physiology 107: 1049–1054.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aspinal, D., and L.G. Paleg. 1981. Proline accumulation: physiological aspects. In The physiology and biochemistry of drought resistance in plants, ed. L.G. Paleg, and D. Aspinal, 205–240. Australia: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardzik, J.M., H.V. Marsh, and J.R. Havis. 1971. Effects of water stress on the activities of three enzymes in maize seedlings. Plant Physiology 47: 828–831.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, L.S., R.P. Walderren, and I.D. Teare. 1973. Raid determination of free proline for water-studies. Plant and Soil 39: 205–207.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, B.C., and Fedovich. 1971. Superoxide dismutase: Improved assay and an assay applicable to acrylamide gel. Analytical Biochemistry 10: 276–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camila, A., C.A. Morilla, J.S. Boyer, and R.H. Hageman. 1973. Nitrate reductase activity and polyribosomal content of corn (Zea mays L.) having low leaf water potentials. Plant Physiology 51(5): 817–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • da Silva, M., L. John, A. Jifon, and A.G. Jorge. 2007. Use of physiological parameters as fast tools to screen for drought tolerance in sugarcane. Brazilian J Plant Physiology 19(3): 193–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hageman, R.H., and D.P. Hucklesby. 1971. Nitrate reductase from higher plant. Methods in Enzymology 23: 491–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, T.C. 1973. Plant response to water stress. Annual Review of Plant Physiology. 24: 519–570.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huffaker, R.C., T. Radin, G.E. Kleinkoe, and E.L. Cox. 1970. Effects of mild water stress on enzymes of nitrate assimilation and of the carboxylative phase of photosynthesis in barley. Crop Science 10: 471–473.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Irigoyen, J.J., D.W. Emerich, and M. Sanchez-Diaz. 1992. Water stress induced changes in concentrations of proline and total soluble sugars in nodulated alfalfa (Medicago sativa) plants. Physiologia Plantarum 84: 55–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt J. 1980. Responses of plants to environmental stress, Vol II. In Water, radiation, salt and other stresses. New York: Academic Press.

  • Koehler, P.H., P.H. Moore, C.A. Jones, A. Dela Crus, and A. Maretzki. 1982. Response of drip-irrigated sugarcane to drought stress. Agronomy Journal 74: 906–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malik C.P., and M.B. Singh. 1980. In Plant enzymology and histology. 53, New Delhi: Kalyani publishers.

  • Mano, J. 2002. Early events in environmental stresses in plants: Induction mechanisms of oxidative stress. In Oxidative stress in plants, ed. D. Inz’e, and M. Van Montagu, 217–245. New York: Taylor & Francis Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattas, R.E., and A.W. Pauli. 1965. Trends in nitrate reduction and nitrogen fractions in young corn (Zea mays L.) plants during heat and moisture stress. Crop Science 5: 181–184.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McKersie, B.D., S.R. Bowley, E. Harjanto, and O. Leprince. 1996. Water deficit tolerance and field performance of transgenic Alfalfa overexpressing superoxide dismutase. Plant Physiology 111: 1177–1181.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore P.H. 1987. Physiological basis for varietal improvement in sugarcane. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Sugarcane Varietal Improvement, 19–56. Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore.

  • Morilla, C.A., J.S. Boyer, and R.H. Hageman. 1973. Nitrate reductase activity and polyribosomal content of corn (Zea mays L.) having low leaf water potentials. Plant Physiology 51: 817–824.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naidu, K.M., and S. Venkataramana. 1989. Sugar yield and harvest index in water stressed cane varieties. Sugarcane. 6: 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panse V.G., and P.V. Sukhatme. 1954. Statistical methods for agricultural workers. New Delhi: ICAR Publications.

  • Pasternak, T., G. Potters, R. Caubergs, and M.A.K. Jansen. 2005. Complementary interactions between oxidative stress and auxins control plant growth responses at plant, organ, and cell level. Journal of Experimental Botany 56: 1991–2001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramesh, P. 2000. Effect of drought on nutrient utilization, yield and quality of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) varieties. Indian Journal of Agronomy 45(2): 401–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, A.R., K.V. Chaitanya, and M. Vivekanandan. 2004. Drought-induced responses of photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in higher plants. Journal of Plant Physiology 161: 1189–1202.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sairam, R.K., and Aruna. Tyagi. 2004. Physiology and molecular biology of salinity stress tolerance in plants. Current Science 86(3): 407–421.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sajitha B (2009) Drought responsive and osmoregulation in sugarcane: A physiological and biochemical approach towards drought tolerance. PhD Dissertation. Coimbatore: Bharathiar University.

  • Shih S.F., and G.T. Gascho. 1980. Sugarcane stalk distribution in two raw spacing. Proceedings of International Society of Sugarcane Technologists 17: 38–58.

  • Singh, S., and P.N.G. Rao. 1987. Varietal differences in growth characteristics in sugarcane. Journal of Agricultural Science 108: 245–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh S., and M.S. Reddy. 1980. Growth, yield and juice quality performance of sugarcane varieties under different soil moisture regimes in relation to drought resistance. In: Proceedings/International Society of Sugarcane Technologists Congress, 17, 541–555. Manila: ISSCT.

  • Sivakumar, V., K. Ramachandran, V. Ravichandran, and M. Vanangamudi. 1998. Effect of drought hardening on proline content of seedlings. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 12: 82–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smirnoff, N., M.D. Winslow, and G.R. Stewart. 1985. Ni-trate reductase activity in leaves of barley (Hordeum vulgare) and durum wheat (Triticum durum) during field and rapidly applied water deficits. Journal of Experimental Botany 36: 1200–1208.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Teare, I.D., R. Manam, and E.T. Kanemasic. 1974. Diurnal and seasonal trends in nitrate reductase activity in field grown sorghum plants. Agronomy Journal 66: 733–736.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vasantha, S., and P.N.G. Rao. 2004. Influence of moisture stress on the activity of oxidative enzymes in sugarcane. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology 8: 405–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkataramana, S., P.N.G. Rao, and K.M. Naidu. 1986. The effects of water stress during the formative phase on stomatal resistance and leaf water potential and its relationship with yield in ten sugarcane varieties. Field Crops Research 13: 345–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkataramana, S., K.M. Naidu, and S. Singh. 1987. Membrane thermostability and nitrate reductase activity in relation to water stress tolerance of young sugarcane plants. New Phytologist 107: 335–340.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Hemaprabha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hemaprabha, G., Swapna, S., Lavanya, D.L. et al. Evaluation of Drought Tolerance Potential of Elite Genotypes and Progenies of Sugarcane (Saccharum sp. hybrids). Sugar Tech 15, 9–16 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-012-0182-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-012-0182-9

Keywords

Navigation