Abstract
Phytomass production is a result of physiological processes occurring at plant canopy level, with canopy architecture affecting the availability of solar radiation to photosynthesizing tissues. The aim of this study was to identify a possible association between light availability, canopy photosynthesis and plant growth in three sugarcane varieties under field conditions. As a hypothesis, higher canopy photosynthesis and plant growth are probably found in sugarcane varieties with higher light availability at bottom canopy positions. Measurements of diurnal course of leaf gas exchange were taken in two canopy positions of the sugarcane varieties IACSP93-2060, IACSP95-3028 and IACSP95-5000, maintaining the natural leaf inclination. All sugarcane varieties exhibited similar values of diurnal CO2 uptake at the upper canopy position. On the other hand, the bottom canopy position had an important role on photosynthesis of IACSP95-3028 sugarcane, with slight changes in leaf inclination causing significant variation of photosynthetic active radiation at the bottom canopy positions. High light availability at the bottom canopy position of IACSP95-3028 caused increased photosynthesis and improved plant vegetative growth, given by increases in tillering, leaf area and leaf and stalk phytomass accumulation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amaral LIV, Costa PMF, Aidar MPM, Gaspar M, Buckeridge MS (2007). Novo método enzimático rápido e sensível de extração e dosagem de amido em materiais vegetais. Hoehnea 34: 425–431.
Bezuidenhout CN, O’leary GJ, Singels A, Bajicb VB (2003). A process-based model to simulate changes in tiller density and light interception of sugarcane crops. Agricultural Systems 76: 589–599.
Bielesk RL, Turner A (1966). Separation and estimation of amino-acids in crude plant extracts by thin-layer electrophoresis and chromatography. Analytical Biochemistry 17: 278–293.
Bonnett GD, Salter B, Berding N, Hurney AP (2005). Environmental stimuli promoting sucker initiation in sugarcane. Field Crops Research 92: 219–230.
Bull TA, Glasziou KT (1963). The evolutionary significance of sugar accumulation in Saccharum. Aus J Biol Sci 16: 737–742.
Grantz DA, Moore PH, Zeiger E (1987). Stomatal responses to light and humidity in sugarcane: prediction of daily time course and identification of potential selection criteria. Plant, Cell and Environment 10: 197–204.
Inman-Bamber NG (1994). Temperature and seasonal effects on canopy development and light interception of sugarcane. Field Crops Research 36: 41–51.
Landell MGA, Campana MP, Figueiredo P, Xavier MA, Vasconcelos ACM, Bidoia MAP, Silva DN, Dos Anjos IA, Prado H, Pinto LR, Souza SCD, Scarpari MS, Rosa Junior VE, Dinardo-Miranda LL, Azania CAM, Perecin D, Rosseto R, Silva MA, Martins ALM, Gallo PB, Kanthack RAD, Cavichioli JC, Veiga Filho AA, Mendonça JR, Dias FLF and Garcia JC (2007). Variedades de cana-de-açúcar para o centro-sul do Brasil: 16o liberação do programa cana IAC (1959–2007). São Paulo, Brazil: Instituto Agronômico.
Lawlor DW (1995). Photosynthesis, productivity and environment. Jour. Exp. Bot. 46: 1449–1461.
Long SP, Zhu X, Naidu SL, Ort DR (2006). Can improvement in photosynthesis increase crop yields?. Plant, Cell and Environment 29: 315–330.
Machado RS, Ribeiro RV, Marchiori PER, Machado DFSP, Machado EC, Landell MGA (2009). Biometric and physiological responses to water deficit in sugarcane at different phenological stages. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 44: 1575–1582. [In Portuguese]
McCormick AJ, Cramer MD, Watt DA (2006) Sink strength regulates photosynthesis in sugarcane. New Phytologist 171: 759–770.
McCormick AJ, Cramer MD, Watt DA (2008a) Changes in photosynthetic rates and gene expression of leaves during a source-sink perturbation in sugarcane. Annals of Botany 101: 89–102.
McCormick AJ, Cramer MD, Watt DA (2008b) Regulation of photosynthesis by sugars in sugarcane leaves. Journal Pl Physiol 165: 1817–1829.
McCormick AJ, Cramer MD, Watt DA (2008c) Culm sucrose accumulation promotes physiological decline of mature leaves in ripening sugarcane. Field Crops Research 108: 250–258.
McCormick AJ, Cramer MD, Watt DA (2009) Supply and demand: sink regulation of sugar accumulation in sugarcane. Jour Exp Bot 60: 357–364.
Moore PH and Maretzki A (1996). Sugarcane. In: E. Zamski & A.A. Schaffer (eds.), Photoassimilate distribution in plants and crops. Marcel Dekker. New York, USA. pp. 643–669.
Nobel PS, Forseth IN and Long SP (1993). Canopy structure and light interception. In: D.O. Hall, J.M.O. Scurlock, H.R. Bolhàr-Nordenkampf, R.C. Leegood and S.P. Long (eds.) Photosynthesis and production in a changing environment. Chapman and Hall. London, UK. pp. 79–90.
Singels A, Smit MA, Redshaw KA, Donaldson RA (2005). The effect of crop start date, crop class and cultivar on sugarcane canopy development and radiation interception. Field Crops Research 92: 249–260.
Tejera NA, Rodés R, Ortega E, Campos R, Lluch C (2007). Comparative analysis of physiological characteristics and yield components in sugarcane cultivars. Field Crops Research 102: 64–72.
Van Handel E (1968). Direct microdetermination of sucrose. Analytical Biochemistry 22: 280–283.
Yoshida S, Forno DA, Cock JH and Gomez KA (1972). Laboratory manual for physiological studies of rice. (2.ed). International Rice Research Institute. Tokyo/Japan 70 pp.
Zhu XG, Long SP, Ort DR (2008). What is the maximum efficiency with which photosynthesis can convert solar energy into biomass?. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 19: 153–159.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marchiori, P.E.R., Ribeiro, R.V., da Silva, L. et al. Plant growth, canopy photosynthesis and light availability in three sugarcane varieties. Sugar Tech 12, 160–166 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-010-0031-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-010-0031-7