Abstract
Transposable elements constitute a large fraction of plant genomes, and changes due to TE mobilization have provided powerful genetic and molecular tools. Somaclonal variation is a common phenomena caused either by various extrinsic and intrinsic factors related to in vitro culture or transposon activity has been detected under cell culture or tissue culture milieu. In this study, variability among direct somatic embryogenesis (DSEM) and indirect somatic embryogenesis (ISEM) regenerants of sugarcane cv. CoC-671 was studied using Ac transposon insertion polymorphism. A total of 254 amplification products were obtained ranging from 0.5 Kb to 2 Kb. The DNA profile revealed genetic polymorphism among the ISEM regenerants compared to DSEM regenerants. There was n uniform insertion pattern of the Ac like transposons among the DSEM regenerants, whereas it was variable in case of ISEM regenerants. The results on the insertion polymorphism of Ac homologous regions among the ISEM regenerants indicate that the transposition occurred during in vitro culture and that this marker system could be useful in profiling of genetic variation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bennetzen JL (2000) Transposable element contributions to plant genome evolution. Plant Mol Boil 42:251–269
Burner D M, Grisham M P (1995) Induction and stability of phenotypic variation in sugarcane as affected by propagation procedure. Crop Sci 35:875–880
Chang R Y, O’Donoughue L S, Bureau TE (2001) Inter-MITE polymorphisms (IMP): a high throughput transposon-based genome mapping and fingerprinting approach. Theor Appl Genet 102:773–781
Chowdhury M K U, Vasil IK (1993) Molecular analysis of plants regenerated from embryogenic cultures of hybrid sugarcane cultivars (Saccharum spp). Theor Appl Genet 86:181–188
Desai NS, Suprasanna P, Bapat VA (2003) Improvements in somatic embryogenesis, analysis of somaclonal variation and genetic transformation in sugarcane In: Proc Int Seminar on “Sugarcane Genomics and Genetic transformation Vasantdada Sugar Institute Pune, India. Pp 28–30
Desai NS, Suprasanna P, Bapat VA (2004) A simple and reproducible method for direct somatic embryogenesis from immature inflorescence segments of sugarcane. Current Science 87(6): 764–768
Edwards D, Coghill J, Batley J, Holdsworth M, Edwards K J (2002) Amplification and detection of transposon insertion flanking sequences using fluorescent Mu AFLP. Biotechniques 32:1090–1097
Ellis THN, Poyser S, J Knox MR, Vershinin AV, Ambrose MJ (1998) Polymorphism of insertion sites of Ty1-copia class retrotransposons and its use for linkage and diversity analysis in pea. Mol Gen Genet 260: 9–19
Frey M, Stettner C, Gierl A (1998) A general method for isolation in tagging approaches: amplification of insertion mutagenized sites (AIMS). Plant J 13:717–721
Fukuchi A, Kikuchi F, Hirochika H (1993) DNA fingerprinting of cultivated rice with rice retrotransposon probes. Japan J Genet 68: 195–204
Grandbastien MA (1998) Activation of plant retrotransposons under stress conditions. Trends in Plant Science 3: 181–187
Grzebelus D (2006) Transposon insertion polymorphism as a new source of molecular markers. J Fruit Ornam Plant Res vol 14(Suppl 1): 21–29
Guiderdoni E, Demarly Y (1988) Histology of somatic embryogenesis in cultured leaf segments of sugarcane plantlets. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 14:71–88
Guiderdoni E, Merot B, Eksomtramage T, Paulet F, Feldmann P, Glaszmann J-C (1995) Somatic embryogenesis in sugarcane (Saccharum species) In: Bajaj Y P S (ed) Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry vol 31 Somatic embryogenesis and synthetic seed II. Springer, Berlin, Pp 92–113
Heinz DJ, Krishnamurthi M, Nickell LG, Maretzki A (1977) Cell tissue and organ culture in sugarcane improvement pp 3–17. In J Reinert and YPS Bajaj (eds) Applied and fundamental aspects of plant cell tissue and organ culture Springer Berlin.
Hirochika H (1997) Retrotransposons of rice: their regulation and use for genome analysis. Plant Mol Biol 35 231–240
Hirochika H, Sugimoto K, Otsuki Y, Tsugawa H, Kanda M (1996) Retrotransposon of rice involved in mutations induced by tissue culture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:7783–7788
Hoy JW, Bischoff KP, Milligan SB, Gravois KA (2003) Effect of tissue culture explant source on sugarcane yield components. Euphytica 129:237–240
Irvine JE, Benda GTA, Legendre BL, Machado GR (1991) The frequency of marker changes in sugarcane plants regenerated from callus culture II Evidence forvegetative and genetic transmission epigenetic effects and chimeral disruption. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 26:115–125
Kumar A, Bennetzen J (1999) Plant retrotransposons. Annu Rev Genet 33:479–532
Lakshmanan P, Geijskes RJ, Aitken KS, Christopher LP, Grof Bonnett GD, Smith GR (2005) Sugarcane Biotechnology: The Challenges And Opportunities. In vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 41:345–363
Lakshmanan P (2006) Somatic embryogenesis in sugarcane- an addendum: sugarcane biotechnology: challenges and opportunities. In vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 42:202–205
Lourens A G, Martin F A (1987) Evaluation of in vitro propagated sugarcane hybrids for somaclonal variation. Crop Sci 27:793–796
Manjunatha BR, Suprasanna P, Desai NS, Bapat VA (2004) Saccharum officinarum Ac like transposon gene partial cds. GenBank (AY644706)
Menossi MM, Silva-Filho C, Vincentz M, Van-Sluys M-A, Souza G M (2008) Sugarcane Functional Genomics: Gene Discovery for Agronomic Trait Development. International Journal of Plant Genomics. doi:101155/2008/458732
Merkle SA, WA Parrott, EG Williams (1990) Applications of somatic embryogenesis and embryo cloning. In: SS Bhojwani (Ed) Plant Tissue Culture: Applications and Limitations. Elsevier, Amsterdam. pp 67–101
Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures Plant Physiol 15: 473–497
Pouteau S, Huttner E, Grandbastien M A, Caboche M (1991) Specific expression of the Tobacco Tnt1 retrotransposon in protoplasts. EMBO J 7:19111–1918
Purugganan M D, Wessler S R (1995) Transposon signatures: speciesspecific molecular markers that utilize a class of multiple copy nuclear DNA. Mol Ecol 4:265–269
Rohlf FJ (1990) NTSYSPc Numerical taxonomy and multi variate analysis system version 202 Applied bio statistics New York.
Rossi Magdalena, Paula Goncalves Araujo, Marie-Anne Van Sluys (2001) Survey of transposable elements in sugarcane expressed sequence tags (ESTs). Genetics and Molecular Biology 24(1–4): 147–154
Schulman AH (2007) Molecular markers to assess genetic diversity Euphytica 158(3): 313–321
Suprasanna P, Desai NS, Sapna G, Bapat VA (2006) Monitoring genetic fidelity in plants derived through direct somatic embryogenesis in sugarcane by RAPD analysis. Jour New Seeds 8(3): 1–9
Taylor PWJ, Geijskes JR, Ko HL, Fraser TA, Henry RJ, Birch RG (1995) Sensitivity of random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis to detect genetic change in sugarcane during tissue culture. Theor Appl Genet 90:1169–1173
Todorovska E (2007) Retrotransposons and their role in plant — genome evolution. Biotechnol & Biotechnol Eq 21(3): 294–305
Vettore A L, da Silva F R, Kemper E L, Arruda P (2001) The libraries that made SUCEST. Genetics and Molecular Biology 24(1–4): 1–7
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Suprasanna, P., Manjunatha, B.R., Patade, V.Y. et al. Profiling of culture-induced variation in sugarcane plants regenerated via direct and indirect somatic embryogenesis by using transposon-insertion polymorphism. Sugar Tech 12, 26–30 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-010-0006-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-010-0006-8