Abstract
The aim of the present study was to select the suitable sowing date and the proper varieties which perform high yielding ability, juice quality and processing parameters under agro-climatic conditions of El-Giza governorate. Two field trials were carried out at Giza Experimental Station, Agricultural Research Center. Fourteen sweet sorghum varieties were evaluated for their yielding ability, juice quality and processing parameters under two sowing dates i.e. May 5th and 25th. Analysis of variance showed: most yielding traits, juice quality and processing parameters acted better in the early planting date (May 5) than in the late ones (May 25). Great variation in most studied traits has been detected among the fourteen sweet sorghum varieties under investigation. Not all sweet sorghum varieties perform good for stalk, syrup and alcohol production, quality and processing parameters in the first planting date, but some of them were suitable for the second planting date. Varieties viz., Mn3306, Planter, Rex, Rio, SS405 and Tracy were distinguished with high potential ability for producing syrup and ethanol. Therefore, these varieties are recommended for dual purpose.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abd El-Karim HA, TS El-Ammari, Maria G. Beshay (1999) Evaluation of some sweet sorghum cultivars for syrup and biomass production. J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura 24(10): 5285–5595.
Allam SM, Nassar AM, Abo AM, El-Wafa, Ali MK (2001) Quality and processing evaluation of some sweet sorghum varieties and their potentialities for Syrup and ethanol production. J.Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ. 26(1): 1–12.
Almodares A, Sepahi A, Karve AD (1994) Effect of planting date on yield and sugar production of sweet sorghum. Ann of Plant Physiology 8(1): 49–54.
Bapat PR, Jadhav HD, Gaur SL, Salunkhe CB, Ingle UM, Kulkarni DN, Throat SS (1987) Sweet sorghum cultivars for production of quality syrup and jaggery in maharashtra. Technology and applications for alternative uses of sorghum. Proc. of the National Seminar Parbhani Maharashtra India 2–3 Feb. 1987, 203–206.
Besheit SY, Ali MK, Maria G, Beshay, Abou Dooh AM (1996) Stalk and technological characteristics of two sweet sorghum cultivars as influenced by sowing date. Adv. Agric. Res. 1(1): 28–35.
Kresovich S, Henderlog PR (1984). Agronomic potential of sorgum as raw material for ethanol production in central Ohio. Energy Agric. 145–153.
Ma ZH, Li D, Nimg XB (1992). Study on brix degree, total sugar content and their relationship in juice of sweet sorghum stem. J. of Shenyang Agric. Univ. China., 23(3): 187–191.
Meade GP, Chen JCP (1977) Cane sugar handbook (11th Ed.) Jhon Wiley and Sons, Interscifnce, New York.
Parvatikar SR, Manjunath TV (1991) Alternate uses of sorghum sweet sorghums a new prospectus for juicy stalks and grain yields. J. of Maharashtra Agric. Univ. India 6(3): 352–354.
Saleh GG (2004) Growth and yield of biofertilized sweet sorghum under stress ecological conditions. Ph.D. Thesis, Enviro. Sci. Dept. Agric. Sci. (Agron.), Ain-Shams Univ., Egypt.
Smith GA, Bagby MO, Lewellan RT, Doncy DL, Moore PH, Hills FG, Campbell LG, Hogaboam GL, Coe GE, Freeman K (1987) Evaluation of sweet sorgum for fermentable sugar production. Crop Sci. 27: 788–793.
Smith GA, Buxton DR (1993) Temperate zone sweet sorghum ethanol production potential. Bioresource Technology 43(1): 71–75.
Somani RB, Bhasharkar DB, Patil DB, Pandrangi RB (1992) Evaluation and utilization of sweet sorghum cultivars for alcohol production. Ann. of Plant Physiol., 6(1): 60–67
Steel RC, Torrie JH (1980) Principles and procedures of statistics. Mc Graw Hill Book Company Inc. New York.
Taha Nour-El-Hoda MT, El-Koliey MM (1999) Response of sweet sorghum to irrigation intervals and nitrogen fertilization. Assiut J. Agric. Sci. 30(3): 65–80.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abd El-Razek, A.M., Besheit, S.Y. Potential of some sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) varieties for syrup and ethanol production in Egypt. Sugar Tech 11, 239–245 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-009-0041-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-009-0041-5