Skip to main content
Log in

Response of sugar beet to some mechanical management practices, irrigation and plant densities

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Sugar Tech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to see the effect of four mechanical practices (shallow ploughing, laser deep ploughing and laser leveled soil + deep ploughing), three irrigation intervals (every 4 weeks, every 6 weeks and every 8 weeks) and three plant densities (35 cm (20000), 25 cm (28000) and 15 cm (46000) plants/fed.) on growth of sugar beet plants of Farida cultivar. Sowing of sugar beet at a laser leveled soil + deep ploughing, among lower plant densities 20.000 plants/fed (1 feddan = 0.42 ha) and irrigation intervals every 8 weeks gave a significant increase in root length, root perimeter, crop growth rate(CGR) and relative growth rate(RGR) in comparison to other treatments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Suhaibani NA, Refay AY (2000) Effect of hill spacing on growth and productivity of some sugar beet cultivars Alex. J. Agric. Res. 45(3): 87–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-tahan YM, Hassan HM, Hammadi IA (1992) Effect of ploughing depths using different plough types on some physical properties of soils. Agric. March, in ASTA and Africa and Latin America 23(4): 21–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ankerman D, Large L (1974) Soil and plant analysis,, ASL. Agricultural laboratories. Inc. New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Gindy AAM, El-Said GH, Osman HE (1996) The effect of different precision land leveling systems on some main yield crops. 2nd international conf. on users and applications. Book of abstracts. Il. I. D. E. S. 16–19 Sept, Cairo Univ.

  • El-Sahrigi AF, El-Sayed GH, Badr SE, Yehia I (2001) Effect of some planting and land leveling systems on barley crop productivity. The 9th Conf. of the Misr Soc. of Agric., Eng. 9–11 October, 2001: 133–146.

  • El-Sayed EAB (2006) Effect of organic, biofertilization and plant density on yield and quality of sugar beet. Ph.D. Thesis, Fac. of Agric., Alex. Univ. Egypt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez KA, Gomez AA (1984) Statistical procedures for agricultural research. An international. Rice Research Institute Book. John Willey and Suns, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halvonson AP, Hartman GP (1984) Reduced seed bed tillage effects on irrigated sugar beet yield and quality. Agric. J. 76: 603–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassanin MA, Ramadan BH (1999) Influence of plant densities and distribution on performance of some sugar beet varieties (Beta vulgaris L.) Bull. Fac. Agric. Cairo Univ. 11: 315–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson BS, Erikson AF (1991) Sugar beet response to subsoiling and wheel traffic agric. J. Voc. 83: 386–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamel MS, Abdalla MNF, Mahmoud EA, Obead IK (1981) Growth, yield and quality of two sugar beet cuttivars as affected by now and hill spacings. Bull. Agric.; Cairo Univ. 32: 499–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalifa MR, Balba AA, Mashali SA, Morssi SA (2000) Impact of soil ploughing depth and different rates of NPK fertilizers on some soil properties yield and quality of sugar beet plant grown in salt affected soil. J. Agric. Res., Tanta Univ. 26(1): 108–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khater M. AA (1999) Response of sugar beet to irrigation intervals, sulphur application and nitrogen fertilization. Ph.D. Thesis, Fac. Agric. Saba Basha, Alex. Univ., Egypt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoud EA, Khalil NA, Besheet SY (1990) Effect of nitrogen fertilization and plant density on sugar beet 2-Root weight, root top and sugar yield and sugar quality Proc. 4th Conf. Argon., Cairo, 15–16 Sept, 11: 447–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokadem Sh A (1993) Evaluation of some sugar beet varieties with varying plant population under El-Minia Governorate conditions. Assiut J. Agric. Sci. 24(4): 77–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neana SMM (1994) Effect of sowing date and density on growth and yield of sugar beet. M.S. Thesis. Fac. Agric., Alex. Univ. Egypt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saied MM (2000) Effect of irrigation intervals, Furrow irrigation system and nitrogen fertilizer levels on sugar beet yield and its water relations at north Delta. J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ. 27(6): 4303–4310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorour S GhR (1995) Response of sugar beet to irrigation regims and plant population. Egypt. J. Appl. Sci. 10(8):648–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tayel SA, Wahby MF, Khairy MFA (1988). Effect of soil preparation on the physical and mechanical properties of sugar beet Misn. J Agric. Eng. 5(3): 357–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yousif HYM (2001) Agronomic studies on sugar beet. M. Sc. Thesis, Fac. Agric, Zagazig Univ., Egypt.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Samia El-Maghraby.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

El-Maghraby, S.S., Gomaa, M.A., Rehab, I.F. et al. Response of sugar beet to some mechanical management practices, irrigation and plant densities. Sugar Tech 10, 219–226 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-008-0040-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-008-0040-y

Key words

Navigation