Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal reactive power dispatch using water wave optimization algorithm

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Operational Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents water wave optimization (WWO) algorithm to solve the optimal reactive power dispatch (ORPD) problem with the continuous and discrete control variables in power system. The ORPD problem is defined as a complex, discrete, constrained nonlinear combinatorial optimization problem. The WWO algorithm is utilized to find the optimized values of control variables such as generator voltages, tap positions of tap changing transformers and the amount of reactive compensation devices to achieve minimized value of active power losses. The WWO algorithm not only effectively avoids the shortcomings of local search and poor calculation accuracy, but also accelerates the convergence rate to find the global optimal solution. The WWO algorithm is implemented on standard IEEE 30-bus power system that is to verify the effectiveness and feasibility of the WWO algorithm to tackle with the ORPD problem. Compared with other algorithms, the WWO algorithm can find the set of the optimal solutions of control variables. The simulation experiment indicates that the WWO algorithm has better overall performance to reduce the real power losses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alsac O, Stott B (1974) Optimal load flow with steady-state security. IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst PAS-93 3:745–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Askarzadeh A (2016) A novel metaheuristic method for solving constrained engineering optimization problems: crow search algorithm. Comput Struct 169:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attia A-F, Al-Turki YA, Abusorrah AM (2012) Optimal power flow using adapted genetic algorithm with adjusting population size. Electr Power Comp Syst 40(11):1285–1299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjelogrlic M et al (1990) Application of Newton’s optimal power flow in voltage/reactive power control. IEEE Trans Power Syst 5(4):1447–1454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deeb N, Shahidehpur SM (1990) Linear reactive power optimization in a large power network using the decomposition approach. IEEE Trans Power Syst 5(2):428–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duman S et al (2012) Optimal reactive power dispatch using a gravitational search algorithm. Gener Transm Distrib IET6 6:563–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia S, Molina D et al (2008) A study on the use of nonparametric tests for analyzing the evolutionary algorithms’ behaviour: a case study on the CEC’2005 special session on real parameter optimization. J Heuristics 15:617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghasemi M, Ghanbarian MM, Ghavidel S et al (2014) Modified teaching learning algorithm and double differential evolution algorithm for optimal reactive power dispatch problem: a comparative study. Inf Sci 278(278):231–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghasemi M, Taghizadeh M, Ghavidel S et al (2015) Solving optimal reactive power dispatch problem using a novel teaching–learning-based optimization algorithm. Eng Appl Artif Intell 39:100–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghasemi M, Taghizadeh M, Ghavidel S et al (2016) Colonial competitive differential evolution: an experimental study for optimal economic load dispatch. Appl Soft Comput 40:342–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grudinin N (1998) Reactive power optimization using successive quadratic programming method. IEEE Trans Power Syst 13(4):1219–1225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenarangui R, Seifi A (1994) Fuzzy optimal reactive power control. Electr Power Syst Res 30(1):47–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy J, Eberhart R (1995) Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on neural networks, Perth, Australia, vol IV, pp 1942–1948

  • Khazali AH, Kalantar M (2011) Optimal reactive power dispatch based on harmony search algorithm. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 33(3):684–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai LL et al. (2005) Swarm intelligence for optimal reactive power dispatch. In: Transmission and distribution conference and exhibition: Asia and Pacific, 2005 IEEE/PES IEEE pp 1–5

  • Lee KY, Park YM, Ortiz JL (1985a) A united approach to optimal real and reactive power dispatch. IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst PAS-104 5:1147–1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KY, Park YM, Oritz JL (1985b) A united approach to optimal real and reactive power dispatch. IEEE Trans Power Syst 104(5):1147–1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandal B, Roy PK (2013) Optimal reactive power dispatch using quasi-oppositional teaching learning based optimization. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 53(1):123–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirjalili S (2016) SCA: a sine cosine algorithm for solving optimization problems. Knowl-Based Syst 96:120–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Momoh JA, Guo SX, Ogbuobiri EC, Adapa R (1994) The quadratic interior point method solving power system optimization problems. IEEE Trans Power Syst 9(3):1327–1336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouassa S, Bouktir T (2016) Artificial bee colony algorithm for discrete optimal reactive power dispatch. In: International conference on industrial engineering and systems management IEEE

  • Mouassa S, Bouktir T, Salhi A (2017) Ant lion optimizer for solving optimal reactive power dispatch problem in power systems. Eng Sci Technol Int J 20:885–895

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw B, Mukherjee V, Ghoshal SP (2014) Solution of reactive power dispatch of power systems by an opposition-based gravitational search algorithm. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 55(1):29–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sulaiman MH et al (2015) Using the gray wolf optimizer for solving optimal reactive power dispatch problem. Appl Soft Comput 32(C):286–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varadarajan M, Swarupa KS (2008) Differential evolution approach for optimal reactive power dispatch. Appl Soft Comput 8(4):1549–1561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcoxon F (1944) Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biom Bull Biom 1(6):112–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu YC, Debs AS, Marsten RE (1994) A direct nonlinear predictor–corrector primal–dual interior point algorithm for optimal power flows. IEEE Trans Power Syst 9(2):876–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang XS (2012) Flower pollination algorithm for global optimization. In: Proceedings of the unconventional computation and natural computation, lecture notes computer science, vol 7445, pp 240–249

  • Yang XS, He X (2013) Bat algorithm: literature review and applications. Int J Bio-Inspired Comput 5(3):141–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng YJ (2015) Water wave optimization: a new nature-inspired metaheuristic. Comput Oper Res 55:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 61463007 and Project of the Guangxi Natural Science Foundation under Grant No. 2016GXNSFAA380264.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yongquan Zhou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, Y., Zhang, J., Yang, X. et al. Optimal reactive power dispatch using water wave optimization algorithm. Oper Res Int J 20, 2537–2553 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-018-0420-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-018-0420-3

Keywords

Navigation